SeriousDuke
Sidekick
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
- Messages
- 1,647
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Take off the 2... and what do you have... 007! It'd be more catchy for the public... and would really get the film noticed...
M.E.H.Z.E.B said:I think you've found the world's thinnest argument for releasing Casino Royale a year after it's projected date. Congrats!
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:How rude,
its a fine idea.. simple and it doesn't need to be explained.
SeriousDuke said:Take off the 2... and what do you have... 007! It'd be more catchy for the public... and would really get the film noticed...
Is it really smart to wait for 2007 just because of a silly marketing gimmick that will do nothing to increase turnout? Nah.Furious Styles said:EON....Do something smart? *Begins To Laugh*
SeriousDuke said:Take off the 2... and what do you have... 007! It'd be more catchy for the public... and would really get the film noticed...
Agentsands77 said:Is it really smart to wait for 2007 just because of a silly marketing gimmick that will do nothing to increase turnout? Nah.
If CASINO ROYALE doesn't make as much as DIE ANOTHER DAY, it won't be because some silly 2007 marketing ploy wasn't used.Furious Styles said:I dunno, let's ask them when Casino Royale doesn't turn out as much as DAD did....
marvelisawesome said:wait so it should be realeased in 007 year?? im confused.
Killgore said:How about moving it to June 7, 2007? Then it'd be
007.007.007
MLX said:You mean July 7, 2007
M.E.H.Z.E.B said:I think you've found the world's thinnest argument for releasing Casino Royale a year after it's projected date. Congrats!
There's have to be at least a hundred days in a month to warrant that, and a hundred months in a year.Killgore said:How about moving it to June 7, 2007? Then it'd be
007.007.007