Thor 2 Dark World news, speculation and pictures possible Spoilers - Part 5

Discussion in 'Thor: The Dark World' started by Thread Manager, Oct 11, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Caboose

    Caboose Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2011
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    0
    "A shadowy enemy that predates the universe itself"


    [​IMG]
     
    #51
  2. jaqua99

    jaqua99 ....I need a horse!

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    8,300
    Likes Received:
    1
    [​IMG]
     
    #52
  3. jaqua99

    jaqua99 ....I need a horse!

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    8,300
    Likes Received:
    1
    but really though, the whole, shadowy enemy thing, to me suggests that he will be in the darkness most of the movie, maybe set up a third movie. But being a threat to odin and to asgard, to me, that sounds more like Surtur than Thanos
     
    #53
  4. Smashlilman

    Smashlilman Ouch!!!!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    3,133
    Likes Received:
    0
    The only two beings in the Marvel Comic universe that I know of that predate the universe are Galactus and TheOneAboveAll.
     
    #54
  5. Flemm

    Flemm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hmmm, well, it's not surprising that there would be some sort of background enemy in addition to the Dark Elves.

    But... it could be a lot of things, I guess, based on that vague description. It reminds me a bit of something Feige (I think?) said a while ago about the loss of Bifrost throwing the Nine Realms out of balance, or something along those lines.

    Anyway, sounds like this is going to be quite epic.

    Yeeeah, the villains in this movie are Malekith and Kurse, and you need to stop thinking that there might be some bigger threat involved in the...

    Oh, wait :doh:
     
    #55
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2012
  6. Chewy

    Chewy REDACTED

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    13,000
    Likes Received:
    0
    Preeeeetty sure sam was saying that the third act of the movie would be an all out war between Surtur and Asgard, and that's what people were arguing against... :doh:

    No one said he wouldn't have a behind-the-scenes presence.
     
    #56
  7. Flemm

    Flemm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    In part, yeah, but we were discussing, in more general terms, the idea that there would probably be some larger threat involved, in addition to the Dark Elves. And throwing around a few reasonably plausible ideas with regard to that.

    Quite a few posters were jumping all over us for "complaining about the villains," etc. Anyway, now that we are starting to hear about the larger threat, I guess we can talk about it in peace :cwink:

    Surtur has always made a certain amount of sense, but the shadows and darkness aspect would be a little odd as a description of him. If it's an Asgardian-style villain, and not something cosmic, I guess it could be Hela. Maybe re-imagined somewhat from the comics version.

    Edit: Having re-read the description, I still think Surtur is most likely. It's just intentionally vague. Sounds like he threatens earth and asgard, as in the comics, with maybe Asgard taking the big hit in the end.
     
    #57
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2012
  8. Rock Sexton

    Rock Sexton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    Messages:
    9,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would be lame to try to stuff Surtur in his entirety on top of Malekith, Kurse, and the Dark Elves. Somebody would get short-changed in the process. I'm all for Surtur's presence felt, but as the bridge to Thor 3.
     
    #58
  9. Flemm

    Flemm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, this came up before, but Surtur doesn't need to be in it much. He would be in the background, probably be the one who transforms Algrim into Kurse, and then he would emerge for the finale.

    I'd say that's looking increasingly likely. Though there are other possibilities, of course.
     
    #59
  10. Chewy

    Chewy REDACTED

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    13,000
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's no point in including Kurse if him fighting Thor and then turning on Malekith isn't the finale. A third act featuring a full-on appearance from Surtur makes the inclusion of Kurse entirely pointless.
     
    #60
  11. Flemm

    Flemm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think so, necessarily. And my point isn't: they should do this, or they should do that. I'm looking forward to whatever it is, and they've already decided regardless.

    But... all the pieces are there for the Surtur saga to be the basic story here. A looming threat that is too great even for Odin to deal with. The casket of ancient winters, Malekith, Algrim/Kurse.

    It's still definitely possible that this movie will just be the first half of the story, though. And that could be the better choice. The thing is... Surtur is a "last act" sort of character anyway. He's never going to be around for the whole film.
     
    #61
  12. Crimson King

    Crimson King Superhero Novelista

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    5,918
    Likes Received:
    0
    If he's in it for more than a few minutes, it's a waste. Talk about Surtur in TDW and maybe even show him, but the confrontation between him, Odin, and Thor should be held off until Thor 3.

    Malekith and Kurse are plenty to carry this movie.
     
    #62
  13. Rock Sexton

    Rock Sexton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    Messages:
    9,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly ..... Gotta save stuff for future Thor films. Why ram all that stuff home in the first sequel?
     
    #63
  14. cherokeesam

    cherokeesam SHIELD Director Coulson

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    12,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    Except here's the thing: Surtur isn't in shadow. He's *never* in shadow. He's a Fire Giant in Muspellheim, and bathes permanently in molten lava. I don't see how terms like "dark" and "shadowy" could even remotely apply to a creature of pure flame.

    The darkness that the synopsis refers to is not metaphorical; it is literal. This movie is about literal darkness....as it says, plunging the world into darkness. Darkness is not in Surtur's skillset. It *is,* however, within the bailiwick of The Dweller in Darkness. Who predates the universe. (And who is a straight ripoff of Cthulhu, by the way.)
     
    #64
  15. Kane52630

    Kane52630 Just Some Nut

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    94,048
    Likes Received:
    218
    [​IMG]
     
    #65
  16. Crimson King

    Crimson King Superhero Novelista

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    5,918
    Likes Received:
    0
    Didn't Thanos also try to cast the universe in darkness? He extinguished a few stars using one of the Infinity gems, IIRC.
     
    #66
  17. jaqua99

    jaqua99 ....I need a horse!

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    8,300
    Likes Received:
    1
    Exactly. Too much. Having Surtur appear as the final 3rd act defeats to point have having Kurse.

    Nah lol

    yeah, but don't take it so literally. The reason I think it points to Surtur is because, yeah of course shadow, and shade doesn't describe Surtur. But by "shadowy enemy" I actually do think it was metaphorically. I think it just meant, the behind the scenes threat. It is a synopsis, ya know? I think that it shouldn't be read into too deeply
     
    #67
  18. Flemm

    Flemm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,611
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's true. I'm not sure if the synopsis can be taken that literally, though. It would be odd for these characters to be assembled, and then have the looming threat be somebody completely unrelated to them. But... anything's possible.

    It's perhaps worth noting that, in the comics, it's the Beyonder who turns Algrim into Kurse. Not that it's going to be the Beyonder, but... some other-worldly entity along those lines, I guess, maybe.
     
    #68
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2012
  19. Avenger

    Avenger Earth's Mightiest Fanboy

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wait a second, he's not an alien! He just has a condition. :woot:
     
    #69
  20. cherokeesam

    cherokeesam SHIELD Director Coulson

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    12,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry, but that ain't metaphor.
    And the synopsis don't stutter when it says "enemy that predates the universe itself." You can count on the fingers of one six-fingered hand the cosmic entities who might fit that bill (Galactus, The One Above All, Dweller In Darkness, Eternity, The Watcher, The Living Tribunal). Thanos (a Titan) and Surtur (a Fire Giant) and Malekith (a Dark Elf) and Kurse (another Dark Elf in funky armor) don't even remotely come close to "predating the universe itself."
     
    #70
  21. pr0xyt0xin

    pr0xyt0xin Shaper Savant

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2012
    Messages:
    7,162
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah, being that Galactus is a non-option, it seems to accurately describe any number of Doctor Strange villains, but few others.

    Though it perfectly describes Dweller in Darkness, it would be odd for him to be added at this point. With Loki, Malekith/Kurse/Svartalfheim and Thanos already on the table. I'm not saying impossible, just surprising to me.
     
    #71
  22. Smashlilman

    Smashlilman Ouch!!!!

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    3,133
    Likes Received:
    0


    The Beyonder might Predate the universe since he's not from our universe and space and time don't exist for him. It would be nice if marvel introduced the existence of the other gods of the Marvel universe.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    #72
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2012
  23. cherokeesam

    cherokeesam SHIELD Director Coulson

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    12,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, I agree that Cthulhu --- I mean, The Dweller --- would be a left-field addition to the storyline. But Malekith and Kurse sure don't fit the synopsis, and (again) it's pretty clear that the synopsis regards them as a separate threat after this "shadowy enemy that predates the universe itself." And Surtur definitely doesn't fit *that* description. Thanos doesn't either, but he's the most likely to have his backstory revamped to qualify....but I hope to hell not. Thanos has a rich story to draw from; he doesn't need some Kirby-style pre-Big Bang Grand Cosmic Poobah addendum to make him more than he already is.

    Beyonder would certainly fit the bill, and would be a literal reading of Simonson's Kurse story; so you might be on the money there. But Beyonder, classically, is something of a joke in fandom; and if he *is* going to be introduced, the first question that fanboys will ask is "OMG WHAR'S SECRET WARS?!?!?"
     
    #73
  24. marvel_freshman

    marvel_freshman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pics some chicks took in Iceland with Hiddles and Levi

    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
    #74
  25. Quasimod0

    Quasimod0 Bell-Ringer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    13,425
    Likes Received:
    2
    Levi looks awesome!
     
    #75
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"