• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Days of Future Past Time Travel films equals CASH!

WC Avengers

Sidekick
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
1,156
Reaction score
0
Points
31
The time travel element in XMEN - Day's of Future Past is the biggest reason why I think it will be a Blockbuster unlike any other XMEN film. Take a good luck at this list of time travel films I have compiled and how much gross they made.

Keep in mind that most of this list not adjusted for inflation but at the time of release they were VERY high grossing films. There is something about the fascination with TIME TRAVEL with people that seems to draw them to these types of films. Most recently was Men In Black 3 which sits just outside of this list. We also have a few lower budget films that went on to be cult classics such as "Hot Tub Time Machine, Twelve Monkey's, Strange Day's and TimeCop to name a few. The possibility of meeting ourselves, of gazing on ourselves from the outside is the paradoxical event that perhaps fascinates most of us in all the narratives on time travel, both in literature and at the movies. The difference between literature and film in this respect is that, thanks to the point-of-view, we the spectators can be perceptively, almost physically part of this unattainable gaze. We look at ourselves while we see and we make ourselves seen at the same time. Most people wonder what will happen if they changed just one thing in there life, what direction would it have gone. What if Steve Jobs would have never met Bill Gates?

10. Back to the Future Part III ($164.25 million)
9. Star Trek: First Contact ($164.27 million)
8. Terminator III: Rise of the Machines ($197 million)
7. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home ($228 million)
6. Back to the Future Part II ($232 million)
5. Star Trek ($273 million)
4. Austin Powers in Goldmember ($290 million)
3. Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me ($321 million)
2. Terminator 2: Judgment Day ($385 million)
1. Back to the Future ($467 million)



This aspect of the film is something I am looking forward to.



list complied from http://www.pajiba.com/
 
Last edited:
If it's done well, why not? But time travel is a tricky thing and can easily muddle storytelling, lets hope they execute.

I really liked Looper and Hot Tub Time Machine, thought they handled time travel interestingly. Good recent ones :)
 
If it's done well, why not? But time travel is a tricky thing and can easily muddle storytelling, lets hope they execute.

I really liked Looper and Hot Tub Time Machine, thought they handled time travel interestingly. Good recent ones :)
I thought Looper was a nice film, but the time travel was handled very poorly and things didn't add up at all. ;)
 
How was the time travel handled poorly in Looper? There wasn't really any obvious leaps in logic or plot holes.
 
How was the time travel handled poorly in Looper? There wasn't really any obvious leaps in logic or plot holes.
There were quite a few actually, have you watched the "everything wrong with" video? It shows and explains most of my problems. ;)
 
How was the time travel handled poorly in Looper? There wasn't really any obvious leaps in logic or plot holes.

It has some problems. The film goes out of it's way to tell us that nobody is murdered in the future because they'd get caught for sure which is the whole reason they send people back. Then they show us Bruce Willis's wife getting murdered in the future.
 
There were quite a few actually, have you watched the "everything wrong with" video? It shows and explains most of my problems. ;)

There couldn't have been, because i didn't notice them. If you go looking for problems, like those youtube videos, you'll find them.

Although i haven't watched it in a while.

It has some problems. The film goes out of it's way to tell us that nobody is murdered in the future because they'd get caught for sure which is the whole reason they send people back. Then they show us Bruce Willis's wife getting murdered in the future.

Thought that was only gangsters who got sent back? And wasn't her murderers implied to be working for higher powers anyway?

Have to watch it again soon.
 
Hopefully this will end up as the most successful time-travel film of all time!
 
"LOGAN! We have to go back! Back to the future! There's something about Xavier's kids"
 
There couldn't have been, because i didn't notice them. If you go looking for problems, like those youtube videos, you'll find them.

Although i haven't watched it in a while.
I spend 7 weeks analysing the film for a portfolio, trying to create timelines and trying to tie it all together. Some of the problems:

- Future Joe is delaying his departure from the future, that doesn't mean his arrival to a specific time in the past would be altered one bit. Yet they show that he is "late".

- People being suprised about seeing scars etc. from things that happen to their younger selves (and thus to them). You could say that it is because they are both alive at the same time alongside eachother, but this goes again the statement from Old Joe: "I can remember what you do after you do it."

- Then there is Joe's wife being killed like kedrell said. This was adressed in an interview, but it is very very sloppy indeed.

- The scene where Old Joe is about to shoot Cid/Sara is both the reason the Rainmaker was created as well as the attempt to assassinate the Rainmaker. Therefore there is no reason in the original timeline for the kid to become the Rainmaker, because we were shown that the Joe that is send back in time is killed in that timeline. So there would not be a Rainmaker in the first place.

- And speaking of assasination: if it's so hard to close your own loop, why don't the mob guys just have one of the other loopers kill the future you, and then give you the nice retirement with none of the guilt?

- Even more importantly: when Young Joe shoots himself, Old Joe disappears. Yet the truck, body etc are still there and Sara remembers all of it. How can that be if the only reason Joe ever came to the farm was to find Old Joe? Which will not happen anymore, because he cannot grow up to become "Old Joe".
So yeah, still an enjoyable movie... but SO many problems. :woot:
 
Last edited:
I have the first Back to the Future film.

And caught the next 2 on HBO. But that line isn't really familiar to me.
 
No argument, you're really on to something there, and so are the studios.

In general, Star Trek films and tv shows seem to play the Time Travel card as one of their safest ways to make a buck ( also Star Trek TNG finale and Voyager finale featured time travel - which was Voyager playing its two big cards, the Borg and Time travel....kind of like First Contact). What did JJ Abrams go with to reboot the series ? Time travel.


Time travel, when it's done even half-decently is great. I mean, I hate Harry Potter, but the predestination paradox in the Prisoner of Azkaban makes the movie (and the book) enjoyable. I didn't really enjoy the BTTF films, but I was still suckered into going to see them, just to see how the paradox would be resolved.
Hell, why is Doctor Who so popular ?

****, even Bill and Ted's excellent adventure is fun, and that's a terrible time travel film. Looper kind of bypasses the problems with time travel, but hey it's still fun -and I liked the ending (although if JGL killed himself then his future self would never have existed, and none of the people he killed would have died...ugh ! Sorry guys, but there are some problems with it after all. Although they don't really detract from how much fun it is.


However, time travel in Superhero films, not been done all often or all that well (especially that awful bit in Superman the Movie).

I'm not really a marvel fan today, but I used to be into the Xmen back in the 1980's and read DOFP back in 1982, and I have to say that I'm really looking forward to this film (notice that it draws from Byrne and Claremont's work, kind of like Last Stand did, but not very effectively).

Having seen the trailers, DOFP looks simply awesome, let's hope Singer gets it right.
It certainly has the potential to be one of the great super-hero films of all time ( I'm waayyyyyy more excited about it than Avengers ), maybe the best Super hero team film.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"