Primal Slayer
Let the Siren scream
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2005
- Messages
- 27,442
- Reaction score
- 5,722
- Points
- 103
Starfire gets a brand new look that is 10x better along with Raven.
Why would amnesia not make anyone a killer though? Her killer instinct may be the foundation of something in her subconscious that's been triggered because she has amnesia?Yeah, it is too soon to know what is happening, but it is uncharacteristic of her being a cold-blooded killer and the amnesia plot is cheap. A shame they already went with it in the first episode. Not a good omen.
Everyone's going to have their very unique idea of what Starfire should look like, there's ultimately no right or wrong. Not unless she was suddenly green skinned with blue hair.You are right, this show is going to be cgi intensive, but it's a pity that even cosplayers look more like Starfire than Starfire in this show.
Who knows? We've only had one episode. Lets wait and find out! Undercover for who exactly? She was obviously undercover, but in what way would it provide for her to be the usual Starfire? She is completely familiar with Earth and humanity and if she isn't suppose to be, that is a major continuity error on their own part.
No, we cant. Its a pivotal trait of the character and changes him fundamentaly. If you cant understand that or agree with fine. But we are not gonna lay off. Thats like making spiderman a murderer. Peoppe are angry and they have a right to benso let them be angry.Can we lay off the Batman is a killer aspect? I remember (post BvS) all the complaints about Batman not being a killer, which is BS. Batman has been a killer in some comics, whilst in others he hasn't. I guess it all depends on which comic you (as a writer) are taking inspiration from; there's so many of them out there with multiple reboots and reimagining's.
Pretty sure Dick/Robin (considering his reasons for leaving Batman) is just as much a killer at the moment; there's no way all those people in that alley survived his onslaught. Pretty sure some of them would have died, so how is Dick/Robin any better than the man he chose to escape at this point?
It's not an absolute trait though, because he has actually gone through killing phases. Batman killing it's a fundamental shock, as it's happened in the comics.No, we cant. Its a pivotal trait of the character and changes him fundamentaly. If you cant understand that or agree with fine. But we are not gonna lay off. Thats like making spiderman a murderer. Peoppe are angry and they have a right to benso let them be angry.
No, we cant. Its a pivotal trait of the character and changes him fundamentaly. If you cant understand that or agree with fine. But we are not gonna lay off. Thats like making spiderman a murderer. Peoppe are angry and they have a right to benso let them be angry.
A lot of things happen in the comics that don't actually become a part of the characters mythos. Superman and Batman not killing is something that has come to define the characters. To the point that whenever they do the opposite, it gets a giant reaction. Also there is a fundamental difference between Batman killing someone as a last resort, and Batman going out of his way to kill and even murder people.It's not an absolute trait though, because he has actually gone through killing phases. Batman killing it's a fundamental shock, as it's happened in the comics.
Or he could you know, keep on doing what he is doing. Just because you don't like what he has to say, doesn't mean he can't express his opinion on a message board.We dont know the context and what exactly happened in the show that made him kill. All we have is one quick sentence from an interview.
So you could watch and find out, then complain if you have to... Or you could just... Watch something else? And let it be.
A lot of things happen in the comics that don't actually become a part of the characters mythos. Superman and Batman not killing is something that has come to define the characters. To the point that whenever they do the opposite, it gets a giant reaction. Also there is a fundamental difference between Batman killing someone, and Batman going out of his way to kill and even murder people.
The argument "it happened in the comic a few times" ignores exactly how the mythology of these characters are built, and how their general iconic traits leak into pop culture.
I see this every once in a while, and it usually goes with the person just going with whatever the company puts out. It was the classic argument over the characterizations in BvS.For whatever reason there are a few fans who just seem to be all in on this Batman is a killer thing despite all the contrary attempts to prevent deaths. I don't get it but they will harp on how he has killed in the past and it's okay for him to just keep on killing now even though there has been a concerted effort for him not to.
Or he could you know, keep on doing what he is doing. Just because you don't like what he has to say, doesn't mean he can't express his opinion on a message board.
What story am I missing? I was specifically talking about the argument that Batman can be the Punisher because it has happened a few times before. While you know, you ignored the entire context of my post, so you can get angry some more.Again, youre missing the whole story, youre missing context. Have some patience ffs.
DC is famous for alternate versions of their characters and out of continuity stories.
Suggesting someone stop watching the show because you don't like the discussion they are having is exactly what kind of suggestion outside of you not so low key complaining about their views and you wanting to stop expressing them here?Im not commanding anyone, just suggesting. As im free to do... You know, on a message board?
Suggesting someone stop watching the show because you don't like the discussion they are having is exactly what kind of suggestion outside of you not so low key complaining about their views and you wanting to stop expressing them here?
the thing that mostly said of late is how the current day writers wantto do their own thing. and they don't care for anything before them. in the comic's it always fails cause no matter hos they say that they ruin the fact withthe word continuity . in that they are both fallow what was there befor their own stint as writers those character are more human with the fact that they remember those past event instead of for getting they went through certain event's and learn lession from them ins stead of repeating the same mistake that was resolve year ago for them or other thing they went through. I know I saw kryton inc say this thisWhat the bad place good are 'alternate versions' if they can't even get the genuine versions right first? If you're not interested in bringing the characters to life as their act and appear in the comics in the first place then what good is doing the show? The idiotic trend in TV now seems to be to make shows for people who don't actually exist. It's not just Titans, it's a bunch of shows thinking they have to reinvent something that isn't broken under the misguided idea there's an audience who will embrace it. It makes absolutely no sense from a marketing perspective to do the exact opposite of what your fans want to watch. The show doesn't have to be exact like its source material, but it has to capture the spirit of it.
LibidoLoca said: ↑
So I learned Catman is real. Fairly Odd Parents wasn't lying.
It's interesting what was done with him after he appeared in the early run of the post resurrection Green Arrow series. I forget whether it was Kevin Smith or it was Brad Meltzer that used him but he was basically a fat washed up has been and getting rolled over by Ollie and Roy wakes him up to how low he has fallen and he regains his edge which leads to his time in the Secret Six which was mostly Simone handling him in some really cool stories but then again that was all back when the last gasp of continuity mattered and character history was seen as something rich to mine and not an obstacle for current writers to have to overcome or circumvent or maybe worst of all just ignore.
If I may, I can't recommend the Smith, Meltzer and Judd Winnick era of Green Arrow enough. good stuff all around. Well worth the read for the characterization and again, mining the GA mythos for compelling stories while adding to the character. I didn't always agree with additions but I could tell these guys cared about the character.
For whatever reason there are a few fans who just seem to be all in on this Batman is a killer thing despite all the contrary attempts to prevent deaths. I don't get it but they will harp on how he has killed in the past and it's okay for him to just keep on killing now even though there has been a concerted effort for him not to.