U.S. to admit 7,000 Iraq refugees into U.S.

Spider-Bite

Superhero
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
7,988
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Iraq refugees knocking: U.S. to let in 7,000
That's up from 800 allowed in since 2003, but fewer than Sweden


WASHINGTON - The United States will soon begin admitting a bigger trickle of the more than 2 million refugees who have fled Iraq, acknowledging for the first time the country may never be safe for some who have helped the U.S. there.
After months of agonizing delays and withering criticism from advocacy groups and lawmakers, the Bush administration has finalized new guidelines to screen Iraqi refugees, including those seeking asylum because helping the Americans has put them at huge risk.
The 2 million-plus people — the fastest growing refugee population in the world — have left Iraq, but Washington has balked at allowing them into the United States for security reasons.


Since the war began in 2003, fewer than 800 Iraqi refugees have been admitted, angering critics who argued the United States is obligated to assist many more, particularly those whose work for American agencies or contractors placed them in danger.
Now, under enhanced screening measures aimed at weeding out potential terrorists — announced this week by the Department of Homeland Security — the administration plans to allow nearly 7,000 Iraqis to resettle in the United States by the end of September.
An initial group of 59, including former U.S. government employees and their families, should arrive in the coming weeks, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said.
Chertoff cites 'unrivaled' legacy of helping refugees
As with incoming refugees from other countries, Iraqis accepted for resettlement in the U.S. will be given assistance from both government and private aid agencies, including language and job training in the communities that will be their new homes, officials said.
"America's tradition of welcoming international refugees and responding to humanitarian emergencies is unrivaled," he said in a statement. "Yet we also must be mindful of the security risks associated with admitting refugees from war-torn countries — especially countries infiltrated by large numbers of terrorists."
Homeland Security officials would not discuss what the enhanced process entails, but several people familiar with the program said it includes additional interviews, biometric screening and cross-checks against employer databases, none of which are necessarily required for non-Iraqi refugees.
The 59 Iraqis who will arrive soon are among a group of more than 700 considered to be the most vulnerable and for whom resettlement interviews have already been conducted, the department said.
They include "persons whose lives may be in jeopardy because they worked for coalition forces," it said, without giving specific numbers of former U.S. employees.
Refugee advocates on Wednesday praised the announcement but lamented that many desperate Iraqis have been languishing in camps in other Mideast countries.
"Obviously, DHS has a responsibility to make sure that everybody who comes into the country is going to be a good citizen ... but they also realize that the country has a responsibility to these Iraqis," said Kenneth Bacon of Refugees International.
"My hope is that with this they will begin a large-scale resettlement program," he said. "We are very disappointed that there are so few now, but I have hope for the future."
Refugees International is one of several groups that have been pushing the administration to accept at least a fraction of the Iraqis and noted that other countries, including some Scandinavian nations, have agreed to accept tens of thousands.

Sweden takes more
"It is embarrassing that Sweden is taking more refugees than we are," Bacon said. "The U.S. should be doing much more."
That complaint has been echoed on Capitol Hill where the Senate and House earlier this month passed legislation allowing a tenfold increase in special immigrant visas for Iraqis and Afghans who worked as translators and interpreters for U.S. forces.
"America has a fundamental obligation to help those brave Iraqis who put their lives on the line by working for our government," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who co-sponsored the Senate bill with Richard Lugar, R-Ind.
As of May 18, the United Nations had identified 4,692 Iraqi refugees at camps in Syria, Jordan, Turkey, Lebanon and Egypt for possible resettlement in the United States.
Officials said they expect that number to rise to about 7,000 by Sept. 30 and the U.S. hopes to admit as many as possible.
"We fully intend and expect to be able to handle 7,000 referrals," deputy State Department spokesman Tom Casey told reporters. "This is very good news that this has now been arranged."
The State Department's Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, which deals with refugee resettlement, said communities around the United States have been identified as destinations for the first batch of Iraqis but would not disclose them pending arrival.
 
Yes. We took on the task of liberating Iraq, so I believe we should be partially be responsible for housing the people whose homes were destroyed by the war.
 
Nah cuase you will let real terrorist as well. YOu have got to have a strong screening process or you are looking at car bombs in the USA as well as another 911.
 
good idea, just make sure you check these people carefully. we may still be the "Great Satan" to some of these people.
 
I voted not sure, because we already meddled enough to make a big mess, and by letting all the civilized intelligent people who want no part of war, to leave a country that needs that mindset more now than ever, is only more of the same failed meddling.

We need to let that country develop on it's own pace by itself, just like the middle east. It's the only way for them to become great.

Yes I feel sorry for them, but helping the smart ones run, were only hurting Iraq more.

If I could I'd change my vote to "no."
 
Well, I guess 7,000 Mexican illegals are going to have to die to make room. :dry:

jag
 
Just keep them in the east coast and ill be fine with it.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Bush unleashes a killer disease in the USA. He is letting to many illegals in this country and I know that doesn't sit well with those good ole boys in texas. :o
 
I voted not sure, but I really mean no.:o
 
nope.. as sad as it sounds.... no way to screen out refugees from terrorists.. we cant do it now.. how can we do it with a mass influx?:huh:
 
nope.. as sad as it sounds.... no way to screen out refugees from terrorists.. we cant do it now.. how can we do it with a mass influx?:huh:
So the US has the right to unilaterally pound a country into the dirt, unleashing a civil war, making the world a far less secure place, and displace millions of innocent people?

And THEN it has the right to abstain from helping to fix the mess IT made? I don't think so.
 
So the US has the right to unilaterally pound a country into the dirt, unleashing a civil war, making the world a far less secure place, and displace millions of innocent people?

And THEN it has the right to abstain from helping to fix the mess IT made? I don't think so.
hey i didnt vote for the guy.. but the old sayin goes.. rather fight the war on THEIR turf than at HOME
 
hey i didnt vote for the guy.. but the old sayin goes.. rather fight the war on THEIR turf than at HOME

What? :huh: Iraq wasn't attacking the U.S. at all, let alone on our own soil. And please don't say they were involved in 9/11 or I'll be forced to laugh at you. :hyper:

jag
 
Didnt U.S allow Vietnamese refugees to the U.S after the vietnam war?
 
What? :huh: Iraq wasn't attacking the U.S. at all, let alone on our own soil. And please don't say they were involved in 9/11 or I'll be forced to laugh at you. :hyper:

jag
no jag what im sayin is .. i feel bad for those folx i do.... but id rather have folx be homeless .. then yours or my family have to worry about car bombings that the thing that scares me most... it sucks for the innocents.. but thats how terrorists work they take advantage of our kindness and they will see it as an oppurtunity to get someone inside.. call it paranoia.. but id rather be scared than SCARRED
 
no jag what im sayin is .. i feel bad for those folx i do.... but id rather have folx be homeless .. then yours or my family have to worry about car bombings that the thing that scares me most... it sucks for the innocents.. but thats how terrorists work they take advantage of our kindness and they will see it as an oppurtunity to get someone inside.. call it paranoia.. but id rather be scared than SCARRED

You miss my point. Iraqi's aren't terrorists. At least...they weren't before we showed up and destroyed their country and put it into chaos thereby giving them a reason to hate us. Prior to the war, Iraqis weren't f**king with us at all, let alone on our own soil. The guys that commit terrorist acts against U.S. soil? We're hardly bothering with them, anymore.

jag
 
You miss my point. Iraqi's aren't terrorists. At least...they weren't before we showed up and destroyed their country and put it into chaos thereby giving them a reason to hate us. Prior to the war, Iraqis weren't f**king with us at all, let alone on our own soil. The guys that commit terrorist acts against U.S. soil? We're hardly bothering with them, anymore.

jag
i get what you're saying.. but now that we are EFFIN with them.. whats to say ... a certain terrorists org pays them or gets in their head to do something to us.. and how can you tell if they are really iraqi refugees or terrorists.. do you KNOW a sure fire way.. if so.. please tell it to our government so they can ensure our safety
 
No because she shouldn't be d***ing around over there in the first place. How about Darfur? There are other places that need our help, not just a country going through a revolution.
 
i get what you're saying.. but now that we are EFFIN with them.. whats to say ... a certain terrorists org pays them or gets in their head to do something to us.. and how can you tell if they are really iraqi refugees or terrorists.. do you KNOW a sure fire way.. if so.. please tell it to our government so they can ensure our safety

Well, an American white boy committed the single biggest act of terrorism on U.S. soil before rogue Arabs flew planes into the the WTC and the Pentagon. I'm more worried about people inside our own country doing something heinous to us, to be honest. There is no way to ensure our safety. Safety is an illusion. I DO know that invading countries that have no beef with us and sending their society into civil war doesn't help breed good intentions, though.

jag
 
Well, an American white boy committed the single biggest act of terrorism on U.S. soil before rogue Arabs flew planes into the the WTC and the Pentagon. I'm more worried about people inside our own country doing something heinous to us, to be honest. There is no way to ensure our safety. Safety is an illusion. I DO know that invading countries that have no beef with us and sending their society into civil war doesn't help breed good intentions, though.

jag


totally agree.. okay then answer me this..


is allowing the refugees to come in making it more succeptable(sp) for terrorists to find their way in or less??


did that even make sense .. sorry


what i mean is

is having sex with a condom safer than abstinance????
 
totally agree.. okay then answer me this..


is allowing the refugees to come in making it more succeptable(sp) for terrorists to find their way in or less??


did that even make sense .. sorry


what i mean is

is having sex with a condom safer than abstinance????

I don't think it really makes a difference, to be honest. If terrorists really want into this country, it's really not that hard for them to get across any of our borders undetected or even through a sea port like Miami via Cuba or the Dominican Republic.

jag
 
You miss my point. Iraqi's aren't terrorists. At least...they weren't before we showed up and destroyed their country and put it into chaos thereby giving them a reason to hate us. Prior to the war, Iraqis weren't f**king with us at all, let alone on our own soil. The guys that commit terrorist acts against U.S. soil? We're hardly bothering with them, anymore.

jag

the administration took a secular state and set its people back by DECADES.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"