WB/DC: It's All Part Of The Plan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wesyeed said:
NOPE TOO LATE. BOY THREW PIANO. HOME = WRECKED.
nope.

so the boy threw a piano... so? what impact it has on his family? does Richard know it?

does even the kid realized that the man is actually dead? there are chances that you don't die from it , you know.. and even if that was the case , even if he knows , he has killed a man who wanted to harm his mother..So yes in a lot of case psychiatrist time :woot: and richard could learn all of it.. so ? that's what i call drama ..and that doesnt' make Superman a home wreker.

Ps: no need to yell that doesn't change anything.
 
superbaby said:
this is the lamest excuse i'd ever heard & you are buying it. c'mon. get a brain. transitional shiit. STM was almost 30 years ago. everybody are ready to move on and celebrate a new superman movie. however this visionless singer gave us a poorly copy version of STM.

WAKE UP WB!!! singer is as awful as Mcg if not worse than him!
Nope,

your opinion .

and i hope that you are not going to continue to insult people.
 
hippie_hunter said:
2. Singer is going to direct the sequel and it is going to be a sequel to Superman Returns. DEAL WITH IT!

years ago, they were a few directors had signed the deals with WB and we thought they were gonna do the movie. you know titanic can be sunk too. :o
 
superbaby said:
WAKE UP WB!!! singer is as awful as Mcg if not worse than him!

Singer: X-Men, X-2: X-Men United, Superman Returns, Usual Suspects, Apt Pupil

McG: Charlies Angels, Charlies Angels: Full Throtle, music videos

Singer: brought a faithful interpretation of Donner's Superman

McG: was going to direct a Superman movie that had a suit in a can, a Kryptonian Lex Luthor who was a CIA agent, a prophecy of Superman going back to Krypton and saving it, Krypton not even exploding, and other lame ass ideas.

Singer: nobody's puppet

McG: Jon Peters' puppet

Singer: was able to restart the Superman project right from scratch and manage to get it out within 2 years

McG: took the reigns from Ratner and still managed to keep it in development hell

Yeah, Singer is just as bad if not worse than McG :whatever:
 
Maze said:
nope.

so the boy threw a piano... so? what impact it has on his family? does Richard know it?

does even the kid realized that the man is actually dead? there are chances that you don't die from it , you know.. and even if that was the case , even if he knows , he has killed a man who wanted to harm his mother..So yes in a lot of case pyschiatrist time :woot: and richard could learn it.. so ? that's what i call drama ..and that doesnt' make Superman a home wreker.

Ps: no need to yell that doesn't change anything.

NOOOOOOOOOOPE. Can't pretzel your way out of this one. :wow:

Even Superboy keeping Dick out of the Loop makes his home wrecked if they can't even trust each other.

SuperHomewrecker will get lois and Dick will get Kitty.

And this isn't drama, it's a custody battle.
 
superbaby said:
years ago, they were a few directors had signed the deals with WB and we thought they were gonna do the movie. you know titanic can be sunk too. :o

But Superman Returns was a success while the other projects never got off the ground!

The sequel is going to happen, stop being in denial.
 
Maze said:
nope.

so the boy threw a piano... so? what impact it has on his family? does Richard know it?

does even the kid realized that the man is actually dead? there are chances that you don't die from it , you know.. and even if that was the case , even if he knows , he has killed a man who wanted to harm his mother..So yes in a lot of case psychiatrist time :woot: and richard could learn all of it.. so ? that's what i call drama ..and that doesnt' make Superman a home wreker.

Ps: no need to yell that doesn't change anything.
the lesson to be learned... kill in your young age. no wonder there are so many gun shooting in the school compus these days.
 
hippie_hunter said:
Dear Superman Returns haters like superbaby,

Stop acting like you represent all of the views of Superman Returns and all of the fans of Superman. There are many people who like the movie and as a matter in fact, a majority of people liked it, they just either
A. Don't post on this board.
B. Don't post on this forum period.
C. The movie has a majority of good reviews, a 76% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes and has a 7.0/10 on IMDB.

There are some things you people have to know:
1. Superman Returns made $391 million from a budget of $204 million. It probally would have done quite a bit better if Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest did not come out the next week. By the way, Batman Begins made $371 million, less than Superman Returns.
2. Singer is going to direct the sequel and it is going to be a sequel to Superman Returns. DEAL WITH IT!

Now that, that has been said, the least we can do on these forums is say what we want for the next Superman movie. And don't say "Fire Singer" or "Singer doesn't get Superman" or "This movie is going to suck." We all know that Warner Bros. reads these boards and those kind of things are just going to phase right through them. "No Zod" or "Please put Brainiac in" or "No campy Lex" or "More action," things that would improve upon the sequel, that is what is going to get through them.

I'm going to nit-pick through the rest of your messsage now:


That's BS and you know that. A sequel to Superman Returns can easily introduce a new villain (which has been confirmed, but who, Zod, Brainiac, who knows). The plot is always developed in a movie (either poorly or awesomely is up in the air). And Superman Returns already went into depth on the characters of Clark Kent, Superman, and Lois Lane.


Unless the sequel to Superman Returns is as bad as Batman and Robin, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, Supergirl, Steel, or Catwoman, it is not going to kill the Superman movie franchise. The movies I mentioned, THOSE are franchise killers.


And what about the people who found Superman Returns rather enjoyable. Are a good chunk of those who watched Superman Returns just simply ignorable? You can't ignore them just like those who hated the movie can't be ignored.

you just perfectly summarised (in in-depth :woot: ) all there is to say :cwink:
 
I can respect anyone who liked the film. I liked plenty of films that were considered mediocre or dissapointments, however, I can't respect anyone's opinion calling the film original or imaginative. The studio was scared by Burton and others by their visions of Superman. They went with the safe play, and we got SR.

What can't be argued is that even if the majority of filmgoers liked the film, there was little passion. That was certainly refelected in the Box office.
 
superbaby said:
the lesson to be learned... kill in your young age. no wonder there are so many gun shooting in the school compus these days.
So, I guess you could say that the Hulk is the cause for this kind of problem too ?

Nope , that's how you intepret things that's all.
 
matthooper said:
however, I can't respect anyone's opinion calling the film original or imaginative. S

But you're going to respect them and learn that maybe your taste doesn't see that this movie was neither mediocre or uncreative.

your opinion , that is all.
 
It was an extremely expensive fan film, that's what.
 
Wesyeed said:
NOOOOOOOOOOPE. Can't pretzel your way out of this one. :wow:

Even Superboy keeping Dick out of the Loop makes his home wrecked if they can't even trust each other.

SuperHomewrecker will get lois and Dick will get Kitty.

And this isn't drama, it's a custody battle.
Nope. superman didn't have the desire and /the will to wreck anything .. so he is not one.

ps: and you can continue , i have still some time :D
 
Wesyeed said:
It was an extremely expensive fan film, that's what.
Your opinion.

imo it was a great movie.

you see , you think that it was an extremely expensive fan film,i think this is a great movie. Voilaa :yay:
 
hippie_hunter said:
Singer: was able to restart the Superman project right from scratch and manage to get it out within 2 years
how? by copying directly from STM but failing capturing the spirit?

the only reason singer got the project was because WB was in desperate and lost.
 
The lesson learned?

When in doubt, plagiarize.
 
Wesyeed said:
The lesson learned?

When in doubt, plagiarize.
Nope, the movie ressemble superficially to the Donner one : plot points ,some dialogue ,and some visuals ( that Singer shot in his own way )

if Singer plagiarised him for that then a lot of great movie plagiarize other ( beginning with the Spiderman movie who have taken a lot from Donner , beginning with the tone , unlike Singer )
 
Maze said:
Nope, the movie ressemble superficially to the Donner one : plot points ,some dialogue ,and some visuals ( that Singer shot in his own way )

if Singer plagiarised him for that then a lot of great movie plagiarize other ( beginning with the Spiderman movie who have taken a lot from Donner , beginning with the tone , unlike Singer )
:yay:

*throws wig at maze*

You can keep that. I'll keep hoping for a director to come along who lives in this day and age.
 
It won't happen anytime soon, maybe the 3rd installment, if not then Batman vs Superman might have a different director.
 
I still have some hope. If Singer can erase the last two movies and random occurances from the first two films, what rule is there that says someone can't erase returns and start nice and fresh?
 
Wesyeed said:
:yay:

*throws wig at maze*

You can keep that. I'll keep hoping for a director to come along who lives in this day and age.
Lol :yay: :cwink: Your opinion :woot: :cwink: :yay:

Or you can say that directo'rs who give timelless look to their movie LIke Burton or Gilliam for example doesn't live in this day or age too..(and they are even more extreme examples)

imo , sometimes with this kind of characters , that is a good thing , if not they look kind of ridiculous and their movie ages ( as much as i like the Donner movies they do feel dated )
 
Maze said:
Nope. superman didn't have the desire and /the will to wreck anything .. so he is not one.

ps: and you can continue , i have still some time :D

The family is wrecked. End of story.
 
Maze said:
Your opinion.

imo it was a great movie.

you see , you think that it was an extremely expensive fan film,i think this is a great movie. Voilaa :yay:

It's my opinion? Hey mom! I gots me an opinion!!!

And i agree. It's a great movie to ruin superman, if that's what you wanted.
 
The film didnt have good "legs." It got a nice bump from the IMAX theaters which saved it from being a complete disaster but in no way did it have legs. It was basically out of regular theaters by Labor Day and was the 8th slowest film ever to $200 million, and as soon as it hit that mark, it dropped from it's remaining dollar theaters before you could blink....

The lack of action, originality, and a charismatic cast really hurt this film, though I blame most of the cast issues on the direction except for Bosworth who was just deplorable in the role of Lois. Dont even get me started on that kid. That thing will be an anchor on this franchise going forward.

As they say in the R&D field, Blow it up and start over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"