- Joined
- Oct 24, 2004
- Messages
- 160,557
- Reaction score
- 10,122
- Points
- 203
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Looks alright, I might rent it...
Martin Lawrence can't seem to do a good movie when he's the lead star, I think he does perform well when he's the sidekick though. The only movie I can think of though, where he's a co-star, is Bad Boys.
Life, he was second bill to Eddie Murphy.
I liked him in Big Momma's House.
Heck, based on the scores, Fool's Good looks like it'll be worse, but for some reason, Roscoe Jenkins has been a target for criticism for months now. If it turns out to be better than Fool's Gold, then maybe people should re-assess their opinion strategy on unreleased movies, eh?!
Well, personally, if you were asking me, a month ago, I'd say that both films look very interesting and if I was still working at a movie theater (like I am now), I would definitely go see both of them. I didn't have a preference or a projection as to which film would be better or worse or anything, but it's hard to compare the to different comedies. It's just that I've personally seen more trashing of WHRJ online than I have of Fool's Gold.What criticism? I've heard equally bad things about both movies. Both look like unmitigated puddles of cinematic doo doo.
I've seen the trailer at work easily, about 25 times literally. The first time I saw the trailer, it was funny, but now I'm completely desensitized.I honestly laughed at the trailers. The shower scene, his mom getting knocked in the head with the baseball, and Mike Epps Yogi Bear impersonation made me laugh.
this movie looks alright, i wouldnt want to pay to see it in theaters, but id still wanna see it later