What should the Hulk look like in the sequel?

[blind_fury]

Personally, I'm hoping for a change in the look.


If you need ideas, check out this thread:
http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showthread.php?t=224598

 

[blind_fury]

I like this look with more hair on the sides and back of the head.

 

[Sava]

that Hulk is beyond awesome but any of the Hulk looks from the first movie will be fine by me, if i had to choose, the Hulk in the first Hulk-out would be my choice, he was spot on perfect, height, looks, and his muscles

 

[Ions]

the Hulk in the first Hulk-out would be my choice, he was sopt on perfect, height, looks, and his muscles

I feel the same.
They can justify the change as either something Bruce did to himself as a cure gone wrong. Or just the gamma radiation effect stabilizing. Or whatver plot mechanic to explain it. Doesn't really need to be explained further.

p.s. That Hulk art is awesome.
p.p.s it would be nice to see Hulk with a beard like Bruce had at the end of the first film.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

Keep him the way he was in the first movie mostly, dont mind some slight alterations, as long they're slight.

 

[Amm-arD]

Yeah i thought he looked brill in Hulk 1, and whatever anyone thinks i thought his size was spot on! Love the pic sent in by blind fury but i hate the ones that make him look dumb, totally ruins the Hulk image

 

[BAH HUMBBUG!]

Well the reason the Hulk looked the way he did for his facial features is they used Bana's face to base it on. I think the Hulk looked fine and they don't need to change anything, unless they change actors

 

[rodhulk]

Well the reason the Hulk looked the way he did for his facial features is they used Bana's face to base it on. I think the Hulk looked fine and they don't need to change anything, unless they change actors

Remember this day, HUMBUG, because I agree with you.

 

[Cracker Jack]

The second pix at the below link is what I think the Hulk SHOULD look like.

http://images.google.com/imgres?img...CREDIBLE+hulk+206&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off

 

[Sava]

there was this great pic in HM.com of Hulk's face with his fist infront of it, awesome drawing and IMO the perfect Hulk face. i cant find it

 

[Amm-arD]

SAVA awesomee avatar

 

[Cracker Jack]

there was this great pic in HM.com of Hulk's face with his fist infront of it, awesome drawing and IMO the perfect Hulk face. i cant find it

This?
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...+up&start=20&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N

 

[Sava]

This?
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...+up&start=20&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N

oh hell yes, i love that Hulk, i mean freaking love that face, the way he looks, his hair... perfect

 

[Sava]

SAVA awesomee avatar

thanks

 

[BAH HUMBBUG!]

Remember this day, HUMBUG, because I agree with you.

lol I'll treasure it

 

[Obi-Ron]

Slight changes:

Longer, shaggy Sal Buscema hair

Smaller - 10 feet tall as the absolute max

 

[Morgoth]

[/quote]This would be good.

 

[ironmaidenrules]

This would be good.[/QUOTE]


i agree

more muscle definition.


and make him a darker green

he looked a tad lime in the 1st one

 

[Ahura Mazda]

I think the Hulk in the first Hulk out was spot on as well. I am not sure his muscles should be definned as above as strength in no way equals muscle definition...

 

[Obi-Ron]

The muscles are OK, but those veins are a little over-the-top.

 

[Norm3]

I would still like to see the Hulk created with CGI. But they need to bring him down to comic book size. King Kong Hulk didn't work for me. It's another case of Marvel not supervising the continuity between the comic book and the movie. The fact that they would allow the director the freedom to make any change he wanted is wrong. I hope they can somehow salvage Crusher Creel / Absorbing Man for future use.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

I would still like to see the Hulk created with CGI. But they need to bring him down to comic book size. King Kong Hulk didn't work for me. It's another case of Marvel not supervising the continuity between the comic book and the movie. The fact that they would allow the director the freedom to make any change he wanted is wrong. I hope they can somehow salvage Crusher Creel / Absorbing Man for future use.

I dont see why they couldnt use Crusher Creel in a future movie, David's powers were slightly different. David ability was that he could "partake with the essences of all things", which isnt exactly absorption.

 

[ironmaidenrules]

yea

david is chair

while creel is what the chair was made of

 

[Ions]

yea

david is chair

while creel is what the chair was made of

hahahaahah
Still, theres alot of characters in Marvel universe who share similar powers. Doesn't mean they are the same character.
For definition, Ang said on the commentary that he didn't consider David to be Absorbing Man(if I recall right it was Marvel making that comparison). He was also the one dubbing him Partaking man.
If we can assign similar powers as being the same character, then Wolverine should be renamed miniHulk.
And we can all agree that David and Crusher Creel have totally different personalities?

 

[Hugebear]

If Marvel makes a movie about Thor, Absorbing Man might appear in his movie first.