Gieferg
Civilian
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 122
- Reaction score
- 52
- Points
- 53
that for a moment after he was stabbed, I thought we were in a dream scene. I was more mind*****ed than anything.
Same here.
that for a moment after he was stabbed, I thought we were in a dream scene. I was more mind*****ed than anything.
Now there is something that would've lowered the average grade by a wide margin.Let's just be grateful, that X24 didn't morph back into.. Mystique xD
Let's just be grateful, that X24 didn't morph back into.. Mystique xD
Kelly Hu still looks good and since Lady Deathstrike 's death was retconned by the events of DOFP anyway, her return would we welcomed.
Mangold obviously thought about throwing in characters and fan service but decided not too.
Have the Logan vs X-24 fight a bit longer.
http://collider.com/logan-spoiler-i...=collidersocial&utm_medium=social#scott-frank^ You got links to those interviews? I haven't seen them.
Great movie.
But the more I think of it, the more I feel like they should have shown Eden as a refuge founded by Magneto. We didn't get to see him in the epilogue of DoFP and last we saw of Ian McKellen was his death that was probably righted in the new timeline. After Apocalypse it really seems like Erik was at peace. This would have been an amazing send-off for him as well.
http://collider.com/logan-spoiler-i...=collidersocial&utm_medium=social#scott-frank
I posted it in another thread, but it's a great interview. Jim talks about how X-24's death liberates Logan to feel, and how his last words are what it feels to live and love, vs what it feels like to die which is what some where saying.
Mangold was going to open the movie with the Westchester incident, he even wrote it but ultimately decided against it because it made the movie about the X-Men dying so there you go, the X-Men are dead.
Let's just be grateful, that X24 didn't morph back into.. Mystique xD
I would'e made X-24 a different person. When he first came on screen, for a split second I thought it was Liev Schrieber again.