For the past 10+ years almost every Superhero movie I watched has the same ending plot.
Point is, I don't watch comic book movies for the ending plots anymore. You know what the final plot is going to be 9 out of 10 times. I noticed it is even a more popular plotline for the more popular superheroes.
(I cannot speak for anyone else, but maybe some of you can agree with me)
Batman Begins - Batman has to save his city from the toxic gas.
The Dark Knight Rises - Batman has to save the city from the nuclear bomb.
The Dark Knight - It wasn't as bad, which is why it was pretty awesome in the theaters. It was more of a personal storyline ending.
I'll cut this trilogy slack because the trilogy after all does mainly involve Bruce Wayne/Batman and his love for Gotham City and his oath to protect it.
Spider-Man 1: I don't remember it having a "save the city from X" kind of plot, which is why I liked it.
Spider-Man 2: Spider-Man has to save the city of Dr. Octopus' bomb.
Spider-Man 3: Can't really remember it.
X-Men 1: Sort of, if I remember correctly, Magneto's radiation would only affect those UN people.
X-Men 2: This one was more personal, which was awesome.
X-Men 3: Even though the movie was bad, they didn't have the X-Men save the world or city from a bomb.
Wolverine: Not the cliché plot ending.
Lot of people give the Wolverine movie and the X-Men movie a lot of hate, including me (not 1 and 2
though), but it was nice to have a superhero movie without the cliché plotline.
The Avengers: They had to save the city/world from that portal.
The Dark Knight Rises - Batman has to save the city from the nuclear bomb.
The Dark Knight - It wasn't as bad, which is why it was pretty awesome in the theaters. It was more of a personal storyline ending.
I'll cut this trilogy slack because the trilogy after all does mainly involve Bruce Wayne/Batman and his love for Gotham City and his oath to protect it.
Spider-Man 1: I don't remember it having a "save the city from X" kind of plot, which is why I liked it.
Spider-Man 2: Spider-Man has to save the city of Dr. Octopus' bomb.
Spider-Man 3: Can't really remember it.
X-Men 1: Sort of, if I remember correctly, Magneto's radiation would only affect those UN people.
X-Men 2: This one was more personal, which was awesome.
X-Men 3: Even though the movie was bad, they didn't have the X-Men save the world or city from a bomb.
Wolverine: Not the cliché plot ending.
Lot of people give the Wolverine movie and the X-Men movie a lot of hate, including me (not 1 and 2

The Avengers: They had to save the city/world from that portal.
STOP READING IF YOU HAVE NOT WATCHED MAN OF STEEL YET!!!!!!!
Then I just watched Man of Steel and they went with that plotline. Superman have to save the entire planet from X (the beam that turns Earth into Krypton.
Then I just watched Man of Steel and they went with that plotline. Superman have to save the entire planet from X (the beam that turns Earth into Krypton.
Point is, I don't watch comic book movies for the ending plots anymore. You know what the final plot is going to be 9 out of 10 times. I noticed it is even a more popular plotline for the more popular superheroes.
I think it is a easy route for the writers to have a dangerous variable (usually a bomb or portal) that will decide life and death for millions of citizens and the good guys. And it is up to the heroes to stop it.
(I cannot speak for anyone else, but maybe some of you can agree with me)