Batmannerism
Super-unknown
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
- Messages
- 7,096
- Reaction score
- 4,768
- Points
- 103
Okay, I can hear the teeth gnashing now and the knives coming out, but
I think it's a valid question.
Which film do people think is better, or like more
Star Wars the Force Awakens
or
Guardians of the Galaxy.
Now, no doubt the rabid SW fanboys are all like " You can't be serious"
well, I am. I actually think that while SWTFA was hugely entertaining
GOTG was actually a better film. SWTFA was a very, very good film, but
GOTG was actually a great film.
- Why ? Well, SWTFA was pretty much a rehashing of the first StarWars film
Plot synopsis:
Which film am I talking about ?
Okay, yes there are a bunch of differences, John Boyega's character being the most welcome of those, but pretty much they're the same story.
While I thought SWTFA was a very good movie ( John Boyega and Daisy Ridley were terrific and Harrison Ford gave his best performance in decades. And I actually really enjoyed Adam Driver
) .....it still fell short of greatness due to a lack of originality.
Now JJ had to integrate a lot of familiar elements and story points, but I think he went a bit too far.
But let me say, SWTFA is a billion times better than any of the prequel movies. I would rate it tied for my 3rd favourite SW movie Return of the Jedi.
My only big complaints were that
In comparison, GOTG didn't have much of a story, other than "find the orb"
but was enormous fun. It acutally made me care about a walking tree and a talking raccoon. It was emotional and hilarious and visually breathtaking.
The feeling I got walking out of GOTG was sheer joy and satisfaction (kind of like when I saw the very first star wars as a kid). Somehow GOTG took a bunch of characters I'd heard of, and had no interest in, and made me give a **** about them (which is not easy ! )
Walking out of SWTFA I felt satisfied that Star Wars was in good hands, at last - but if GOTG is a 10/10 then SWTFA for me is an 9/10, close but not quite as great.
Interested to hear what people think. And hey, I should say I saw SW when it first came out in 1977, and it was the greatest movie ever (although Superman came close in 1978) I've seen it so many times I've lost count.
I grew up a huge SW fan, and still love the series.
I just think that GOTG was something fresh and fun and actually captured the feel of SW 1977, even more than perhaps SWTFA did.
Okay.... enough from me. Go !
I think it's a valid question.
Which film do people think is better, or like more
Star Wars the Force Awakens
or
Guardians of the Galaxy.
Now, no doubt the rabid SW fanboys are all like " You can't be serious"
well, I am. I actually think that while SWTFA was hugely entertaining
GOTG was actually a better film. SWTFA was a very, very good film, but
GOTG was actually a great film.
- Why ? Well, SWTFA was pretty much a rehashing of the first StarWars film
Plot synopsis:
" young person eking out an existance on a desert planet finds a droid that contains a secret message of great importance and has to get the message into the right hands. Mystery surrounds our hero's parentage and family connections play a part. The main character finds a connection to the Force, which they later use at a critical moment, and is helped along by a wise older mentor -who is then killed by the main villain, who wears black and fights for a vast, evil imperalistic group of facists.
And in the background a huge planet-sized weapon of mass destruction is used to intimidate the galaxy into submission."
And in the background a huge planet-sized weapon of mass destruction is used to intimidate the galaxy into submission."
Which film am I talking about ?
Okay, yes there are a bunch of differences, John Boyega's character being the most welcome of those, but pretty much they're the same story.
While I thought SWTFA was a very good movie ( John Boyega and Daisy Ridley were terrific and Harrison Ford gave his best performance in decades. And I actually really enjoyed Adam Driver
especially his tantrums, I liked that his character was more conflicted and tormented than just irredeemably evil, which is what Vader appears to be when we first meet him.. Love that bit where he's throwing a fit because Rey escaped and the Stormtroopers turn around and head back the way they came....that was a bit of JJ Abrams' magic !
Now JJ had to integrate a lot of familiar elements and story points, but I think he went a bit too far.
But let me say, SWTFA is a billion times better than any of the prequel movies. I would rate it tied for my 3rd favourite SW movie Return of the Jedi.
My only big complaints were that
the Starkiller base wasn't really built up enough, unlike the Death Star, which sounds damn scary, although I loved the size comparison between SKB and the DS, that was funny, and also I think the final scene needed to be a bit shorter, no need to watch Rey climb all those stairs, although it was almost worth it to see Luke
In comparison, GOTG didn't have much of a story, other than "find the orb"
but was enormous fun. It acutally made me care about a walking tree and a talking raccoon. It was emotional and hilarious and visually breathtaking.
The feeling I got walking out of GOTG was sheer joy and satisfaction (kind of like when I saw the very first star wars as a kid). Somehow GOTG took a bunch of characters I'd heard of, and had no interest in, and made me give a **** about them (which is not easy ! )
Walking out of SWTFA I felt satisfied that Star Wars was in good hands, at last - but if GOTG is a 10/10 then SWTFA for me is an 9/10, close but not quite as great.
Interested to hear what people think. And hey, I should say I saw SW when it first came out in 1977, and it was the greatest movie ever (although Superman came close in 1978) I've seen it so many times I've lost count.
I grew up a huge SW fan, and still love the series.
I just think that GOTG was something fresh and fun and actually captured the feel of SW 1977, even more than perhaps SWTFA did.
Okay.... enough from me. Go !