I say keep it down to the people that have actually used the Flash name. We don't need to complicate things with the Quicks and Max Mercury and all.
M.O.S:
There's no reason Flash should just have one trilogy. Once the first trilogy sets up the premise then bring in the legacy characters for a second trilogy.
He can't support an entire movie let alone a series,
I taped every episode of the 1990 CBS series and it still holds up today. John Wesley Shipp will forever be the speedster byb.
The visiuals even back then were excellent-except for sometimes when he 'dashed' off, the actors were just frozen for a fraction of a second, but hell that'd how he'd be if that's how it went.
You'd have to bring in Capitalist courriers, and kil%ore, and have people accept a Grodd.
He's the first hero I dug so I'm partial, just not to a whole movie.
If your basing your information totally on that tv show your not seeing the whole picture.....Besides the tv show what have you read or know about Allen and the Flash franchise?.....Allen's got amazing potential on his own and he's only a small part of the Flash franchise.
Yea, but your coming from, and I may be mistaked an uber fan of Flash, I know it all, Wally, Barry,Iris, Showcase #4, Impulse.
Outside of his personality he's still Mercury-he can joke w/ the best of them, but the accesory around the man is what makes the story good.
Don't lure me into an argument about what translates best on paper vs. what moves to live action. The Flash T.V. show was one of the best D.C. offerings over the past 20 years, cause there ain't been much.
Can it be done, of course, but I'd hope he'd fall into the team concept of some form of the JL, like when they moved to Detorit, although I don't think he was on the team then.
I loved the T.V. show, and they cancelled it, DESPITE my 15 year old letter to CBS indicated other wise.
His personality is bland but so is Superman. All it takes is a good script and an actor who can deliver a great performance.
I'll take your word on that. I haven't seen the show.
....Yea, that goes for any role in the history of dramatic performace
...You what?!?!? What in hell is your argument then-
There was a whole season of a live action Flash and you haven't even seen it.
Sorry you discovered comics so late, brush up.
That applies to all adaptions, not just The Flash.Considering how well Iron man did this weekend I can see flash doing pretty if they cast, direction and writing is write. But the marketing has to be really good as well.
M.O.S:
There's no reason Flash should just have one trilogy. Once the first trilogy sets up the premise then bring in the legacy characters for a second trilogy.
That was a pretty damn cool montage.I am surprised someone that liked the TV series so much would still think that The Flash couldn't support his own movie. With the recent surge in lesser known superhero movies I can't see how The Flash can not be able to support a movie.
Montage!
That was a pretty damn cool montage.![]()
It was ahead of it's time, w/ all the period cars and stuff, and it was violent too.150-200M is too much for a character that the general public isn't that familiar with. That's more along the lines of Bats, Supes or Spidey. I do think Flash would do well with something a little north of 100M though. Perhaps less depending on how efficient the FX work is done.