Homecoming Who should reboot villain be? (Poll Version)

Reboot villain?

  • Green Goblin

  • Doctor Octopus

  • Kraven the Hunter

  • Mysterio

  • Vulture

  • Electro

  • Sandman

  • Lizard

  • Rhino

  • Shocker

  • Venom

  • Carnage

  • Scorpion

  • Morbius

  • Morlun

  • Other

  • Green Goblin

  • Doctor Octopus

  • Kraven the Hunter

  • Mysterio

  • Vulture

  • Electro

  • Sandman

  • Lizard

  • Rhino

  • Shocker

  • Venom

  • Carnage

  • Scorpion

  • Morbius

  • Morlun

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
As much as I love Spectacular Spider-Man, the treatment of Eddie Brock in that series more or less turned Brock into the comicbook version of Harry Osborn. And that highlights exactly the problem, because making Brock into ersatz Harry then led to turning Harry into a simp. That cartoon had to alter a second character, just to make a lame character all that more accessible.

Harry was already the cool friend that had Peter's back during school, that eventually became a rival/villain that tormented Peter both in and out of costume. In other words, Venom wound up being a complete waste since they already had Harry. I would not be surprised if Greg Weisman realized that when the decision was made to include Brock, thus leading to radically altering Harry's character to accommodate someone else fulfilling his traditional role. That last part is conjecture, but I'm just saying, I wouldn't be surprised.

I think altering Eddie`s character is unnecessary. Have him be straight-up unlikable until he gets the suit, then have him be a straight-up villain.

I don`t think Harry was ever the cool friend in College. He was very weird even back in the day, with his somewhat creepy features and bizarre bow-ties. It`s part of the reason Norman looked down on him so much. Weisman did alter the character a bit to fit HS status quo, but not nearly as much as Raimi did with his movies, o Bendis did with his Ultimate version.
 
I think altering Eddie`s character is unnecessary. Have him be straight-up unlikable until he gets the suit, then have him be a straight-up villain.

I don`t think Harry was ever the cool friend in College. He was very weird even back in the day, with his somewhat creepy features and bizarre bow-ties. It`s part of the reason Norman looked down on him so much. Weisman did alter the character a bit to fit HS status quo, but not nearly as much as Raimi did with his movies, o Bendis did with his Ultimate version.

Harry was totally the cool kid in college. He was wealthy, was best friends with the all-star jock, and the beautiful ladies. He certainly wasn't a wimpy guy who cowered all the time, as depicted in SSM. However, one trait that was accurate was Harry constantly seeking Norman's approval. That much never changed.
 
Here's my take on what makes Brock tick: He's an arrogant jerk who by his own standards has the "perfect life". He's at the peak of physical fitness, has all the right friends, all the ladies love him. But his attempts at advancement at the Bugle are constantly passed up in favor of Peter Parker, this "wimpy nerd" who in Brock's eyes doesn't deserve any of the attention he gets. Thisis what fuels his jealousy and hatred toward Peter, as well as his character as a whole.
 
I'll never understand why some fans think he's the opposite of Spider-Man. Just because he has similar powers? How being a guy who obtains powers is being just like Peter is beyond me. Nearly every villain in Spidey's rogues gallery was just a guy who got powers somehow, usually accidentally like Peter did, too.

There's only one villain in Spidey's villains I'd call Spidey's evil opposite and that's Doc Ock. Because they actually share a lot in common and not just something superficial like similar powers. They were both born and raised in middle class New York. Both were shy repressed nerdy Science geek kids who wore big round glass, had no friends, unpopular with girls, got bullied in school.


GeekPeter1.jpg


OttoGeek1.jpg



Both lost their parents at a young age, both acquired their powers through their love of Science. Even the love of Otto's life before he became Doc Ock was a woman called Mary Alice an obvious similarity name to Mary Jane.

Even Otto recognizes similarities of himself in Spider-Man;

WOD4-1.jpg



That's why he was Spider-Man for 2 years in the Superior Spider-Man saga. He was the perfect candidate to inhabit Peter's body and life because they are two sides of the same coin. Only one is the geek turned hero and the other is the geek turned villain.

I don't think that the idea behind Venom is anymore stupid than the idea of a guy falling into a boiling pot of chemicals and ending up with a big grin on his face. Some of the origins of these characters are a little ridiculous, but the end result can make up for it. To me Spidey and Venom are the perfect counterparts, and the fact that the symbiote takes control of Brock after being dumped by Parker only helps to reinforce this. This is why Venom is such a great villain.

Anyways Joker, how do you feel about Harley Quinn, being a huge Joker fan? Do you like her character or does she annoy you?
 
Harry was totally the cool kid in college. He was wealthy, was best friends with the all-star jock, and the beautiful ladies. He certainly wasn't a wimpy guy who cowered all the time, as depicted in SSM. However, one trait that was accurate was Harry constantly seeking Norman's approval. That much never changed.

There`s quite a difference between being friends with the cool kids and being cool yourself. Harry`s wealth, while getting him close to the popular guys and beautiful girls, never made him one of them. His portrayal in the 90`s Animated Series is pretty spot on in this case: he was constantly walking around supporting Flash, but Flash himself got annoyed at him pretty quickly and usually sent him on his way as soon as he could. They resembled more this

lefou_gaston.jpg


than an actual equal-footing friendship. Flash was the popular one, while Harry, despite being his friend, never got much recognition. TSSM, while I agree changed the character into being part of the "unpopular" crowd, does have a scenario that resembles comics-Harry a little: when he starts drinking Globulin Green, and starts hanging around Flash`s crowd. They obviously like having him pay for everything and drive them to expensive places, but they also obviously feel Harry is out of place among them.

I always thought it was important for Harry`s character to never actually succeed greatly in anything, which is the reason for Norman`s disappointment. Norman thinks he has given his child every opportunity in the world, having an incalculable amount of money, but yet Harry can`t be the smartest nor the most athletic nor the most popular kid in school. He assumes that if Harry couldn`t succeed with all this money, than he couldn`t possibly ever succeed at all.
 
Last edited:
The problem with Venom is simple.

Eddie Brock isn't interesting at all.

The symbiote is.

The only time the host has ever been more interesting then the symbiote is Agent Venom with Flash.
 
Here's my take on what makes Brock tick: He's an arrogant jerk who by his own standards has the "perfect life". He's at the peak of physical fitness, has all the right friends, all the ladies love him. But his attempts at advancement at the Bugle are constantly passed up in favor of Peter Parker, this "wimpy nerd" who in Brock's eyes doesn't deserve any of the attention he gets. Thisis what fuels his jealousy and hatred toward Peter, as well as his character as a whole.

I think that most important Spider-Man foes are the antithesis to Peter, and Brock is no different: he represents what Spider-Man would be like without Uncle Ben`s "With great power, comes great responsability". Venom and Brock serve the purpose of reminding us that if it wasn`t Peter under that Spider suit, those powers could be used to terrible effect. Brock, unlike Peter, is unable to live with the letdowns of his life, and feels entitled to having everything the way he envisioned it. His hatred for Parker is purely incidental: he would hate anyone that surpassed him at the Bugle, because he is simply that petty. Which is actually pretty tragic, since he only realizes he had it good when he gets an incurable disease.
 
Voted "Other". Because KINGPIN.

Daredevil-Vincent-DOnofrio-as-Kingpin-680x1024.jpg
 
Voted "Other". Because KINGPIN.

Daredevil-Vincent-DOnofrio-as-Kingpin-680x1024.jpg
I was thinking for a second."This is awesome but couldn't they cast someone a bit heavier and wider?"
But then I thought to myself. If they casted someone superfat like the Kingpin is in the comics then he wouldn't be able to run around and do stunts without passing out on the set.
 
The problem with Venom is simple.

Eddie Brock isn't interesting at all.

The symbiote is.

The only time the host has ever been more interesting then the symbiote is Agent Venom with Flash.

Bingo. You just hit the nail on the head.
 
I was thinking for a second."This is awesome but couldn't they cast someone a bit heavier and wider?"
But then I thought to myself. If they casted someone superfat like the Kingpin is in the comics then he wouldn't be able to run around and do stunts without passing out on the set.

Donofrio is brilliant casting. I want to see both him and Matt Murdock showing up in Civil War. I'd LOVE to see Spider-Man going against Kingpin, would be completely different than the "mad scientists" scenario we have been getting for almost fifteen years now.
 
I actually brought up the fact that I thought Flash/Agent Venom was more interesting than Eddie Brock Venom.

Infact I wouldn't mind if they did the Black Suit Arc, then at then end where Spidey fines the will to remove the suit they have Flash take up the mantle as Venom instead and at first he's fighting Peter. But then Flash's respect for Spider-Man overpowers Venom and allows him to become the hero Agent Venom.
 
The problem with Venom is simple.

Eddie Brock isn't interesting at all.

The symbiote is.

The only time the host has ever been more interesting then the symbiote is Agent Venom with Flash.

Brock is a character who I feel was burnt out due to over usage which was the same thing that happened to Green Goblin two decades before. Over usage kills interest. I think you could agree to that.
 
I know this isn't the topic. But where do I go to add my avatar and my signature?
 
Mysterio is an easy clean up because both he and Spider-Man worked in show business around the same time. Modifying Quentin to be a primary antagonist would only require a slight shift in narrative. Quentin hated doing stunt work and special effects and wanted to get in front of the camera. His initiative to do so failed, which led him to turn to crime. That's the comicbook narrative. For the film? Simply connect Quentin's show business aspirations to Spider-Man.

Imagine if Beck had been trying for two years to get in front of the camera as an actor. He fails again and again. Then he comes up with a brilliant idea; a gimmick. So he invents the Mysterio persona and attempts to pitch that gimmick in a last ditch effort to gain stardom. When Spider-Man shows up, he gets the business contract that Beck was going to be signed to. Feeling humiliated, Beck uses his special set of skills to frame Spider-Man and destroy his celebrity/public image (part of this is already comicbook accurate as Beck did indeed try to frame Spider-Man in their initial encounter). At the same time, Spider-Man will suffer the tragedy of uncle Ben's death, leading Spider-Man to reject fame and fortune. This only further pisses off Beck, who would have been happy to have had the contract. The now purpose driven Spider-Man seeks out Beck, not only to clear his name, but to fulfill his uncle's philosophy.

I haven't fleshed out that concept, because I am literally making it up as I type this post, but I think that could work. Plus, you'd get an interesting psychological dichotomy as you see two people with similar motivation and opportunities that wind up taking divergent paths and then clashing as a result. The showman turned hero vs the showman turned villain.

That's a good plot I'll give you that. But you didn't exactly play by my rules, you came up with a motivation for the villain that wasn't in the comics. It's a slight shift indeed, but isn't switching Eddie Brocks motivation to something much more solid a slight shift too? That and fleshed out character writing is all you need to turn it into a brilliant villain, just like with Mysterio. What if in addition of a job Eddie truly loses something? A loved one? An arm ? Or his legs get paralyzed? Because Spider-man influensed by the symbiote indirectly caused something. And then the symbiote grants the use of his legs again

I don't want Venom any time soon but eventually yes. Any Spider-man villain needs as much changing for a movie adaptation as Venom does
 
I don't think that the idea behind Venom is anymore stupid than the idea of a guy falling into a boiling pot of chemicals and ending up with a big grin on his face. Some of the origins of these characters are a little ridiculous, but the end result can make up for it. To me Spidey and Venom are the perfect counterparts, and the fact that the symbiote takes control of Brock after being dumped by Parker only helps to reinforce this. This is why Venom is such a great villain.

I'm not talking about the idea behind Venom, I'm talking about the idea that some fans, for reasons that are beyond me, think of him as the evil Spider-Man or the anti Spider-Man, when there's only one villain in Spidey's rogues gallery who credibly fits that title and that's Ock for the reasons I mentioned.

Having similar powers is such a shallow superficial reason to call them the perfect counterparts, as is Brock inheriting Peter's hand me down symbiote. That doesn't make him Peter's perfect counterpart wearing his rejected suit.

Anyways Joker, how do you feel about Harley Quinn, being a huge Joker fan? Do you like her character or does she annoy you?

Random question, but I love Harley. She's a great character.

The problem with Venom is simple.

Eddie Brock isn't interesting at all.

The symbiote is.

The only time the host has ever been more interesting then the symbiote is Agent Venom with Flash.

Exactly :up:

Harry was totally the cool kid in college. He was wealthy, was best friends with the all-star jock, and the beautiful ladies. He certainly wasn't a wimpy guy who cowered all the time, as depicted in SSM. However, one trait that was accurate was Harry constantly seeking Norman's approval. That much never changed.

Also true. Harry was part of the 'in' crowd, who like Gwen, initially looked down his nose at Peter when they first met him in college.

2mhevkm.jpg
 
Last edited:
They could make Eddie Brock interesting though. It's all in the writing.
 
I'd love to see a version of Eddie like in Adi Shankar's "Truth in Journalism" short. A bit like Jake Gyllanhaal in Nightcrawler (but handsomer), and he's trying to get the scoop on Spider-Man until things go wrong.
[YT]7YDYL6oECjU[/YT]
 
As much as people love to criticize the Venom/Eddie of SM3, I feel like Raimi did a lot of things right. A lot of details that would work well if they decided to re-tell the story.

If you start with the backstory of how Peter and Eddie knows each other, you can either go the rival photographer way, or them being friends since they were young way. Both of these could work, but I think I prefer it the first way. There's only so many times you can pull the "best friends since youth" card, and IMO it's much better suited for Harry Osborn. I also feel like in order to create a conflict between them, it's easier if they are rivals.

With the conflict, I think Raimi did, or at least try to do the logical option. Eddie starts getting the upper hand on Peter for the job, but crosses the line, Peter exposes him, Brock gets fired and once he gets the symbiote they both have a common goal, to destroy Peter/Spider-Man. If this wasn't one of 6 stories in the movie, and had been given more screen time, I feel like this could have been great. I don't think something like a love triangle between Peter, Eddie and a girl would be enough for Eddie to have so much hate over Peter.

As for the portrayal of Eddie, I like Truth in Journalism, because as Jordacar said in his post, he feels a bit like Gyllenhaal in Nightcrawler, and a little bit of Bale in American Psycho. He has that creepy vibe of being ready to do just anything for the scoop. And this could play really well with his story arc. He starts off by winning Jameson over, because he is willing to do just anything to get the best pictures, and Peter isn't. But eventually he crosses a line and he gets his career destroyed.
 
I'm not talking about the idea behind Venom, I'm talking about the idea that some fans, for reasons that are beyond me, think of him as the evil Spider-Man or the anti Spider-Man, when there's only one villain in Spidey's rogues gallery who credibly fits that title and that's Ock for the reasons I mentioned.

Having similar powers is such a shallow superficial reason to call them the perfect counterparts, as is Brock inheriting Peter's hand me down symbiote. That doesn't make him Peter's perfect counterpart wearing his rejected suit.

Someone doesn't like Venom, I take it?
 
I'm reposting my post on the last page because I felt some didn't see it.

Yes, indeed, but the images and the Scarecrow references led me to believe you wanted a more baddass, cunning, even truly frightening Mysterio. I wouldn`t like that.

But as I said in the last phrase of my post, I could still see most of your storyline ideas working (they are great), I just would not want a totally serious Mysterio. He could still be vengeful/playing off Peter`s memories while being same-old Mysterio, and working with a Bigger Bad.

I wouldn't consider my Mysterio frightening. He's more Freddy/Scarecrow influence in terms of he causes these illusions and you can't beat him by punching him. You sort of have to play his game to beat him.

In my first Mysterio story, he's really trying to entertain people in a way and trying to create news stories and buzz. In the third act with Spidey going to his place and the whole Circus thing, it does get a bit darker but Circuses are at times dark you know with the clowns and stuff.

In my second story, he decides if he can't get people to love him, he will make them love him and creates this world where he's the highest being so to speak. He's like Comstock in Bioshock Infinite. I can't say with the state of Rapture, he's like Ryan due to how depressing Rapture is. On the basis it does sound darker but this is a man who wants fame back who wants his name back and nobody will give him a chance so he's gonna make everyone suffer.

With the third story, he decides to put Spider-Man on the ride of his life by making him experience his worst nightmare with then his greatest dream in the hopes that Spidey never wakes up from that dream and won't be able to meddle in Mysterio's plans.

That is an excellent idea. I wouldn't mind seeing this at all. Not sure how I feel about Mysterio being a mutant/inhuman with illusion powers. There is already Mastermind and Lady Mastermind: mutants that have the power to create illusions. If Mysterio also has such an origin/power set, I would wonder why the story would not simply use Mastermind or Lady Mastermind.

Because I didn't know who Mastermind and Lady Mastermind is....

Also I think it's fair to share, there's bound to be mutants who share similar powers you know? It's not like everyone is different.

I don't know, I just feel that Mysterio having powers and using them to cash in really connects with Spidey and also helps in making his illusions seem possible.

Where do you see such an idea fitting into the Spider-Man atmosphere? The character has never really dealt with anything that is too cerebral.

While not hating my Mysterio, I wouldn't say I'm making him Doc Ock levels of smart. In the first story, he's primarily using his powers. The second story, he figures out a way to spread his powers and effect the entire island all at once. He would have done it on a small level in the audience of his shows being amazed his acts but now he's trying it on a larger scale. Third he just focuses on Spidey.

Also when you think of Spider-Man's rogues, besides Green Goblin, Kraven, Chameleon, and Doc Ock, there aren't that many cerebral beings. I consider why Connors is Lizard that Lizard is mindless you know? It always worked best for him to become a beast. Then you got guys like Shocker, Sandman, Electro, and Rhino who have never been known for their brains. Venom well you know how bad he is.

I don't see him as a true intelligent foe for Spidey. I see him as more of a rogue where Spidey does have to think a little more for then others simply because Mysterio in my take is a master of deceptive and illusion. How do you know if something is real or fake? When it hits Spidey and hurts him it sure feels real even though it makes not sense how.

I also got a brilliant and very, very different take on Chameleon that still respects the lore and what Chameleon is all about but it raises him above the B or C list of Spidey foes and makes him an A list. I would love to post it. Maybe tomorrow if you're interested.

Now with the post I want to reply to.

Brock is a character who I feel was burnt out due to over usage which was the same thing that happened to Green Goblin two decades before. Over usage kills interest. I think you could agree to that.

There's a difference. Green Goblin died and was dead for years. Norman was dead. Harry took over out of respect to his father.

With Eddie Brock, the problem is that he seems like a loser in a badass costume. You don't want to see Eddie, you want to see Venom.

And the amount of Venom usage isn't what has killed Venom. It's the fact we have Venom, Anti-Venom, Carnage, Toxin, Scorpion as Venom, female Venom. We have some many symbiotes it's too much and takes away from whatever makes Venom special. Honestly the only one I like is Carnage because Carnage is ****ing evil. Carnage is a serial killer. There are times where Venom is a hero and times he's a villain. With Carnage, he's 100% villain (except that recent comic arc).

When we look at Bane and Doomsday who came out around Venom and similar to Venom when compared to the heroes they are villains for, the reason Doomsday is a better character (and that's being nice to Doomsday saying he is a character) is because Doomsday is 100% monster. All he wants to do is kill and destroy everything. Writers use him more as a weapon because we know he isn't a mastermind and we always like seeing Doomsday fight Superman. With Bane, Bane is just as smart as Batman and a better fighter then Batman. Bane's only negative is his addiction to the Venom drug but even without it, he can still go toe to toe and beat Batman without it.

With Venom, there is nothing that makes him interesting other then the fact he's got Spider-Man's powers. Venom isn't a criminal mastermind like Bane. He's really Spider-Man's Doomsday but the problem is nobody knows it on the surface.

I only like Venom when he's with Flash. Agent Venom was the best thing ever to Venom. I love Agent Venom like I love Guy Gardner as a Red Lantern.
 
There's a difference. Green Goblin died and was dead for years. Norman was dead. Harry took over out of respect to his father.

With Eddie Brock, the problem is that he seems like a loser in a badass costume. You don't want to see Eddie, you want to see Venom.

And the amount of Venom usage isn't what has killed Venom. It's the fact we have Venom, Anti-Venom, Carnage, Toxin, Scorpion as Venom, female Venom. We have some many symbiotes it's too much and takes away from whatever makes Venom special. Honestly the only one I like is Carnage because Carnage is ****ing evil. Carnage is a serial killer. There are times where Venom is a hero and times he's a villain. With Carnage, he's 100% villain (except that recent comic arc).

When we look at Bane and Doomsday who came out around Venom and similar to Venom when compared to the heroes they are villains for, the reason Doomsday is a better character (and that's being nice to Doomsday saying he is a character) is because Doomsday is 100% monster. All he wants to do is kill and destroy everything. Writers use him more as a weapon because we know he isn't a mastermind and we always like seeing Doomsday fight Superman. With Bane, Bane is just as smart as Batman and a better fighter then Batman. Bane's only negative is his addiction to the Venom drug but even without it, he can still go toe to toe and beat Batman without it.

With Venom, there is nothing that makes him interesting other then the fact he's got Spider-Man's powers. Venom isn't a criminal mastermind like Bane. He's really Spider-Man's Doomsday but the problem is nobody knows it on the surface.

I only like Venom when he's with Flash. Agent Venom was the best thing ever to Venom. I love Agent Venom like I love Guy Gardner as a Red Lantern.

To be brutally honest when you look at his character as presented in his debut appearance his motives do make sense when you understand he’s a hypocrite. What some people saw as Micheline retconning the Sin Eater story to provide Brock with an origin, I just saw as a deluded man twisting the facts to convince himself he’s a victim. This isn’t a guy whose motives make sense to us, because frankly we’re all sane. But from his POV, it makes sense. It’s just him scapegoating Spider-Man for his own failings and using him as an outlet for his frustrations, because he's incapable of facing those failings himself.
 
Last edited:
I'm not talking about the idea behind Venom, I'm talking about the idea that some fans, for reasons that are beyond me, think of him as the evil Spider-Man or the anti Spider-Man, when there's only one villain in Spidey's rogues gallery who credibly fits that title and that's Ock for the reasons I mentioned.

Having similar powers is such a shallow superficial reason to call them the perfect counterparts, as is Brock inheriting Peter's hand me down symbiote. That doesn't make him Peter's perfect counterpart wearing his rejected suit.

I disagree that Ock is the only villain that represents the flipside to Peter. He is one of them for sure, but Brock`s attitude also embodies something that Peter could have become if he hadn`t been raised as he was. They both also shared the some of the same issues and experiences, to which each reacted in completely different ways. I have already tackled this, though, so I`ll copy it and leave it here in a Spoiler tag:

I think that most important Spider-Man foes are the antithesis to Peter, and Brock is no different: he represents what Spider-Man would be like without Uncle Ben`s "With great power, comes great responsability". Venom and Brock serve the purpose of reminding us that if it wasn`t Peter under that Spider suit, those powers could be used to terrible effect. Brock, unlike Peter, is unable to live with the letdowns of his life, and feels entitled to having everything the way he envisioned it. His hatred for Parker is purely incidental: he would hate anyone that surpassed him at the Bugle, because he is simply that petty. Which is actually pretty tragic, since he only realizes he had it good when he gets an incurable disease.

Also true. Harry was part of the 'in' crowd, who like Gwen, initially looked down his nose at Peter when they first met him in college.

People can be friends with popular people and not be popular themselves. Harry was part of the "in" crowd, I concur. What I disagree on is that he was truly beloved and admired by his college mates. I`ve also already said my opinion on this matter, so I`ll repeat what I did with Venom:


There`s quite a difference between being friends with the cool kids and being cool yourself. Harry`s wealth, while getting him close to the popular guys and beautiful girls, never made him one of them. His portrayal in the 90`s Animated Series is pretty spot on in this case: he was constantly walking around supporting Flash, but Flash himself got annoyed at him pretty quickly and usually sent him on his way as soon as he could. They resembled more this

lefou_gaston.jpg


than an actual equal-footing friendship. Flash was the popular one, while Harry, despite being his friend, never got much recognition. TSSM, while I agree changed the character into being part of the "unpopular" crowd, does have a scenario that resembles comics-Harry a little: when he starts drinking Globulin Green, and starts hanging around Flash`s crowd. They obviously like having him pay for everything and drive them to expensive places, but they also obviously feel Harry is out of place among them.

I always thought it was important for Harry`s character to never actually succeed greatly in anything, which is the reason for Norman`s disappointment. Norman thinks he has given his child every opportunity in the world, having an incalculable amount of money, but yet Harry can`t be the smartest nor the most athletic nor the most popular kid in school. He assumes that if Harry couldn`t succeed with all this money, than he couldn`t possibly ever succeed at all.

It’s just him scapegoating Spider-Man for his own failings and using him as an outlet for his frustrations, because he's incapable of facing those failings himself.

Exactly.
 
Someone doesn't like Venom, I take it?

Understatement.

I disagree that Ock is the only villain that represents the flipside to Peter. He is one of them for sure, but Brock`s attitude also embodies something that Peter could have become if he hadn`t been raised as he was. They both also shared the some of the same issues and experiences, to which each reacted in completely different ways. I have already tackled this, though, so I`ll copy it and leave it here in a Spoiler tag:


Nothing you've said there makes Brock an anti Peter Parker. You are saying the same false logic the other poster I was addressing was saying. What issues and experiences in life did Brock face that are the same as Peter's? Was he a lonely nerdy kid? Did he lose parents at a young age? Was he bullied constantly because he was the Science geek? Did Brock even love Science and acquire his powers through that? Was he unpopular with girls? Your claim is so vague and devoid of any details. As for him not being able to live with his let downs in life, name me a Spidey villain who can. They are all products of their let downs and backgrounds. Every single one of them. Why you think Brock is one of the few contenders to that I don't know.

Name me as many personal traits he has in common with Peter that Octavius does. Then you can say he's a candidate to be the anti Spider-Man.

People can be friends with popular people and not be popular themselves. Harry was part of the "in" crowd, I concur. What I disagree on is that he was truly beloved and admired by his college mates. I`ve also already said my opinion on this matter, so I`ll repeat what I did with Venom

But Harry was popular. Harry was admired because he was the rich kid of the school. He was the popular money bags with clout. You concede Harry was part of the in crowd, and that's why he was.

Arach Knight is dead right when he said they had to rewrite Harry in SSM to make Brock what Harry was. That's the problem with Venom. His fans claim he can be better if he's rewritten, you ask them what should he be rewritten as, and you basically describe as him as another character, a better character, that we already have in Spidey's universe. So why do we need Venom? Answer is we don't. He provides nothing of value to Spidey's world.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,359
Messages
22,091,835
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"