Wonder Woman's New Costume!

I like the polarizing idea JMS has for Diana, but i think the Biker jacket makes her too much into Black Canary. I personally love the fact she leaves her mark on the victims, even tho it stretches to Zorro and hence you might have some Batman connection.... Ah JMS ship some Batman + Diana please! :awesome:
 
I like the polarizing idea JMS has for Diana, but i think the Biker jacket makes her too much into Black Canary. I personally love the fact she leaves her mark on the victims, even tho it stretches to Zorro and hence you might have some Batman connection.... Ah JMS ship some Batman + Diana please! :awesome:

I can't help but think of that episode of Mythbusters where they tested comicbook myths, like leaving a mark on evildoers. I know it's fiction but, now that I know it isn't possible, I can't help but laugh a little with I see that WW preview.
 
The leaving of a mark from a ring is more Phantom than Zorro....but I think this is just one of those things that DC does now and then (like when Superman split into blue and red) that will make publicity for the character and then eventualy go back to the old suit.
 
The jacket looks too much like the 90's where every hero had a leather jacket and why is she wearing what look like cowboy boots?
 
Ah the 90s. Remember when Conner had shaved sides and a leather jacket? Hey, could be worse, they could be giving her a hoody like Scarlet Spider (though I did like that costume). Anyways, it doesn't look bad per say, though it does have aesthetic similarities to Dinah's outfit of choice. It will pass though. They always do. From Superman Blue to Iron Spider-Man, all of these changes pass and restore the status quo. On a side note though, it looks like they are abandoning some of the American flag oriented influence. I always felt that is what ultimately kept Diana's costume relevant.
 
Don't like Wonder Woman's new costume, and JMS' comments seemed to indict that he did it out of political-correctness as a response to his female friends' complains. WW's costume has been around for over 7 decades and I don't see why it needs to change now, especially since I doubt this change would've prompted new female readers to buy WW comics. But like the electric blue & red Superman, eventually WW will go back to the old star-spangled banner costume with the hot pants.
 
I posted this on Comic Book Resources after I found out about this:

Lame. From the interview I read, JMS was inspired by Trinity from The Matrix. So when "updating" the most iconic female superhero in the world, he decided to mold her after a generic badass chick from an 11 year old movie that was the first part of a trilogy that nobody even talks about anymore since the third part bombed in 2003. A movie that based its aesthetics on outdated late-90s "goth" style.

I'll admit that I'm a "traditionalist" when it comes to superheroes; I like the iconic looks and I'm opposed to changing things around. But if they do change a look, I'm OK with it if they retain the core features of the costume and just tweak things around a bit. For example, that Xena skirt and uparmored breastplate look that they've gone with occasionally is something that I don't have a problem with.

This costume is just plain and generic. Without closely examining the details, it could easily pass for the jacket, pants, and tank top that any random woman on the street could be wearing. And I don't buy into the "it's more practical" argument either. Practical wardrobes goes out the door for a character like Wonder Woman, who can block bullets, get slammed through concrete, and take Superman punches. She's basically the female Superman. Does anyone talk about how impractical Superman's colorful cape and underwear-on-the-outside is?

JMS also argues that WW hasn't really changed her look in nearly 70 years. First of all, neither has Batman and Superman. Second of all, WW, like the other those other two icons, HAS updated her look. The Eagle was replaced with a "W" emblem, the laced-up red shoes have been replaced with sleeker boots, and the knee-length skirt has changed into a much shorter bottom. All nice little aesthetic tweaks, while retaining the color and visual identity of the character.

I only speak for myself, but I think part of the appeal of superheroes is that they wear colorful, visually striking costumes that make them unique. It's somewhat "cool" that a character can be so confident and independent that they can pull off such a gaudy costume. The bright colors also make them symbols, instead of mixing them in like this plain black leather outfit. Once again, WW is the female Superman. She's not some street-level vigilante.

This change has actually made it into the mainstream news, like CNN and Fox News. From a brief look at the comments posted there, it seems like most people don't like this change. I think it's a safe bet that this will be another failed revamp, and that within a year or two WW will be back in her iconic outfit. If you have such a well-recognized symbol, then the last thing you should be doing is to go away from it.

Since posting that, I've read that it's supposed to be a "temporary" alteration just for the current (alternate universe?) story that they're doing. Intentionally made just to draw attention and get people talking. Is that true? If it is, then that's both relieving (because this costume and reboot won't be around for long) and lame (because it's just another "shocking" cry for attention).
 
DC screwed it up big time, but as you guys say, it may not last long!
 
Well, this may not even be a change for the main book. Apparently, it is part of a retelling of Diana's origin story (which I am not sure I like the idea of her being the child of a murdered family on Themyscira...seems sketchy, but we shall see). I guess we will have to see how things pan out.
 
I'm probably one of Jim Lee's biggest fans but that costume looks horrible to me. I can't really think of one redesign of his that I've liked. Hopefully this is just one of those fads that will last for awhile and then fade away.
 
I really don't like that. She's Wonder Woman, she doesn't need to look so.... bum-ish.
 
Wow. It's rare that something in comics is so wrong that it renders me speechless. I mean, really, that? On Wonder Woman? And people with the power to influence this sort of thing think it's actually a good idea? Just... wow. :dry:

I didn't know about the Matrix connection until I read this thread, either. Apparently Dr. Strange is no longer the only character to fall victim to JMS' Matrix fanboyism. Let's hope Wonder Woman can at least bounce back from it as well as Strange did someday... :csad:
 
Forget the new costume, that can and will be undone. I'm more skeptical about her new origins. I thought DC was done with these origin-history changing s*&^! This will be her 3rd retcon!
 
Forget the new costume, that can and will be undone. I'm more skeptical about her new origins. I thought DC was done with these origin-history changing s*&^! This will be her 3rd retcon!

Did you know Morrison changed Batman's origin aswell? Tho for JMS' it's just the Gods messing her up for the story arc, ye know. :)
 
In what way did Morrison change Bats' origin.
 
Batman created the Black Glove, so Black Glove created Batman.

It's all in Return of Bruce Wayne.
 
That's not even slightly the same thing.

It's not even changing his origin it's an addendum to events, not completely new set of events.
 
It's not even changing his origin it's an addendum to events, not completely new set of events.

It's a redefinition of Bruce Wayne's origin where nolonger Joe Chill was a mere random thug. He was send by The Black Glove to murder Martha and Thomas Wayne, thus giving birth to Batman. Who in his time travels created the "Bat god force" religion with the Miagani Tribe which the Black Glove took the "dark side of the bat force".

Wonder Woman will get her reality fixed, she will defeat the gods! We all know this as much as we knew Bruce was coming back since his "death".
 
Jesus, Morrison did all of that and people didn't think it was ******ed? That must've been some mighty good writing...
 
It will pass in due time, just like the I-Ching/Diana Prince era (which was somewhat resurrected during Donna's tenure as Wonder Woman). They just shake up the status quo to attract attention. Also, WompUM, that is a nice manip.
 
Yeah, I'm not worried about Wonder Woman in general. She's a big enough character that she'll spring back to her more common status quo eventually. I was just taken aback at how utterly wrong the costume was at first. Now that I know JMS is changing Diana's whole backstory to go along with it, it makes more sense. It's still not good, but I have some context for it. Unfortunately, JMS' take doesn't make me the least bit interested in Wonder Woman again, so I'll be passing on his run.

Granted, if DC is starting to subscribe to Joe Q's "no press is bad press" mentality, this kind of media splash was just what they were going for. I wouldn't be surprised if DiDio and/or JMS went to Jim Lee and basically said, "Give me whatever you think is least sensible for Wonder Woman."
 
Jesus, Morrison did all of that and people didn't think it was ******ed? That must've been some mighty good writing...

It's very subtle so far. Maybe RoBW #4, #5 and #6 makes it simple, so you can see the outrage happen. :oldrazz:
 
Well, I mean, JMS inserted some mystical totem hoo-doo into Spider-Man's origin--in such a way that you could easily choose to believe it didn't actually mean a damned thing--and people went apes***. Morrison's changes sound much more pronounced than that, yet I haven't heard a peep about them. Just a bit surprising.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,430
Messages
22,103,580
Members
45,897
Latest member
jhsnnn
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"