Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]509785[/split]
Perhaps weaker than the others, but I think the horsemen are all a bit over-powered. In the comics, Dark Beast's function was based more on his intellect. This would have been a great way to develop Hoult's Beast because so far he's been such a sinkhole of boring-ness.He'd make for a pretty weak horseman though.
That would be better but it seems Mystique is the one taking on the leadership role not Beast. I'm hoping at least his battle with himself comes to a conclusion in some way in this movie.I'd feel a stronger way to push Beast in the narrative would be that Hank has to set up to the plate and show more leadership with Xavier captured. Hank's always been in his shell, it would need a more natural feel to get him out of it than simply Apocalypse forcing him out to be his henchmen and when all is said and done, Hank just has to settle for changes made
To be fair, this movie, going by what has been said so far, seems to be an improvement on the use of mutants. Out of an ensemble of 16, only two roles seem to be for power display only (Angel and Psylocke)... whereas in DOFP you had what? Almost the whole group of future mutants (although I hear the Rogue Cut gave them some character), plus the mutants Mystique saved in Saigon.
EDIT: I'm not justifying Angel and Psylocke being power display mutants, though.
They wanted to spread the progression over 3 movies presumably, like a 3 movie journey
Well it's taken 30 years now dealing with the same issues that others have moved on to different things. It's no excuse he should still be having that issue except the writers didn't know what to do with him or as I said they dropped the ball simply.
Well in all fairness if we used sexuality as a comparison then there are probably people out there that never accept who they are and gone through life hiding in the closet from themselves and others, so I ain't sure there really is a deadline for this stuff
Plus the premise of mutants feeling like freaks or outcasts is very much an X-men thing, some suffer by their powers and some don't
I think what it comes down to is whether you are just bored of that arc aand since it was spread out over 3 films it's a fair enough criticism but I wouldn't say they dropped the ball since the premise is very much an x-men thing
Well in all fairness if we used sexuality as a comparison then there are probably people out there that never accept who they are and gone through life hiding in the closet from themselves and others, so I ain't sure there really is a deadline for this stuff
Plus the premise of mutants feeling like freaks or outcasts is very much an X-men thing, some suffer by their powers and some don't
I think what it comes down to is whether you are just bored of that arc aand since it was spread out over 3 films it's a fair enough criticism but I wouldn't say they dropped the ball since the premise is very much an x-men thing
Do you guys think anything of Shipp name-dropping the Phoenix in her interview? She's either very well versed in X-Men lore (possible), or she knows because the Phoenix has indeed a sizeable part in the movie.
Singer has made it sound like there are teases to the phoenix in the movie but i doubt he will totally unleashing her in this movie when there are things he will likely want to save for sequel.
Shipp is probably goin by comic lore and X3 which she most likely had watched in preparing for role
Singer has made it sound like there are teases to the phoenix in the movie but i doubt he will totally unleashing her in this movie when there are things he will likely want to save for sequel.
Shipp is probably goin by comic lore and X3 which she most likely had watched in preparing for role