Logan creates new timeline since 1973, Scott will be still alive in this one.
totally agree with that.
Cyclops and Angel should be pivotal roles in a possible Age of Apocalypse addaptation. With the rest of the team involved too and Cable being there too, in case Fox wants to make a big X-Men & XForce crossover
Isn't there a temple in DOFP?
Possible connection to Apocalypse?
^ Totally agree that Sinister could hold his own as a main villain. Especially if they go back in time to show Nathaniel Essex's origin. That would be pretty cool!
Apocalypse needs to be an X-Men villain. Yes some of the X-Force cast could be in the story, but he needs to be the villain of the X-Men. But the great thing with Apocalypse is that in Age of Apocalypse anything is possible. Any dead character could be back. Just cause Cyclops is dead doesn't mean they couldn't bring him back.
But let's analyze each of the main characters in AOA:
Legion: Do we HAVE to have Legion be the one to kill Xavier? No, but it would be cool. I've seen it done (I believe in a cartoon) where Wolverine (or was it Bishop) comes back from the past and it is now the Age of Apocalypse. Could be done either way, though having Legion (or someone else) go back to the past again would enable the First Class cast (some of them) to be used again.
Bishop: He's the only one that knows that the timeline was changed. We will have Bishop in DOFP, so he's good to go.
Magneto: Could possibly use Fassbender as the Magneto in the AOA. Once the past changes, does what year it is really matter? Guess it does a bit since these X-Men movie timelines are so messed up. Either way Mags leads the X-Men against Apocalypse.
Astonishing X-Men (Rogue, Sabertooth, Blink, Wild Child, Morph and Sunfore). This group could be changed up some, but effectively Mags sends a team to stop the cullings.
Amazing X-Men (Quicksilver, Storm, Dazzler, Banshee, Iceman and Exodus). Same thing, these characters can be changed up to be just part of Mags' X-Men.
Weapon X and Jean: Very important characters (and popular to the GA). The relationship between Wolvie and Jean are important.
Factor X: Cyclops is important. I would normally say his brother is as well, but in our X-Men movies Havok won't work. What is important is that Cyclops is a "bad guy", but he is really helping people escape Beast's pens and he is then helped by Jean.
Dark Beast is important as a minor villain.
X-Man is probably not necessary.
I know many of you think that Angel is important, but why?
He could still be made into Archangel by Sinister in a future movie. I know, he's supposed to be the Horseman Death, and I guess this could be worked into the movie...
So really, who do we need?
Apocalypse
Magneto
Wolverine
Jean
Cyclops
Dark Beast
Bishop
And then some others (Blink, Storm, Etc.)
So why is Cable so important for AOA?????
I know that in a different story it was Apocalypse that infects Nathan, but did that happen in AOA? Couldn't that happen by Sinister? Guess it could happen in AOA. Still don't see why Cable is needed.
^ A story about a dystopian future ruled by a being of imense power that believes in survival of the fittest, caused by the accidental death of Prefessor X in the past, seems like a great story to me. And AOA, just like DOFP, resets at the end. Once Apocalypse is defeated and the past is fixed, you're back in the normal timeline with Xavier alive and everything fine.
And there are many cool places to go from there, including:
- Days of Future Present (An X-Men and F4 crossover)
- The Mutant Massacre (Could lead to Angel becoming Archangel)
- Asteroid M (with Fabien Cortez, etc.)
- X-Cutioner's Song (Crossover movie after Cable is ontroduced)
- The Phalanx Covenant
- The Shiar Empire (Hey, if we can have a Guardians of the Galaxy movie, than why not the Shiar? Deathbird and the Starjammers could be cool)
- X-Tinction Agenda
- Fatal Attractions
- Onslaught
- The Dark Phoenix (Once Jean's brought back)
- The Brood
- Inferno
So I'd say there are many good stories to tell after they do Age of Apocalypse!
I think this all comes down to the actors that we have. Once the current actors for Xavier and Magneto, and especially Jean and Wolvie are no longer going to be used, it will be time to reboot or go in a different direction. Knowing that these movies come out say every three years that would mean that the next X-Men movie is likely for 2017...
I think all of us would agree with you that Apocalypse is the biggest threat possible in the X-Men stories. So this begs the question:
- With the current actors and the current X-Men movie universe, is X5, which will likely be in 2017, the last one? If so then doesn't AOA make sense?
If not then I can see what you're saying. I've always thought that a Mutant Massacre movie would be great, with the Reavers as the main bad guys and Sinister as the force behind them. And then that would lead to a Sinister movie.
So yes, if they want to have movies in between DOFP and AOA then have Wolvie come back, everything is "fixed" and Jean and Scott are back. great. Then have a movie or two inbetween. And then have someone (Legion or someone else) go back in time again, accidentally kil Xavier, which causes the AOA.
My thought is that too many go back in time movies will come off as "been there, done that". But by having one "go back in time movie" cause the second, "have to go back and fix the past movie", then it seems like one big movie spilt into two...