The Dark Knight Rises You Have My Permission To Lounge - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought all the Batman scenes were flashback?
Could be.

If it's true that the events of this film take place after BvS, then we can assume he stopped being a meathead in this flick. Right?
It's possible that he'll stop killing other humans and branding them from now on, but once Darkseid takes over, he'll be killing aliens left and right and probably leading the pack like an arrogant child again.

At least SS takes place after BvS. I didn't initially realize that.

So hopefully we'll have reformed, back to 'normal' Batman here.
But some of the Batman scenes could be from years ago. If it's all post-B v S, then it looks like he's back to being a little more heroic. But i doubt it will last, and i doubt this changes his Bruce Wayne. I don't see his Bruce acting too different. Im getting used to this Bruce being an A-Hole who doesn't take orders. Is it possible that Supermans death changed him? Sure. But it could only be that, not the Martha moment that changed him.
 
Joker is a lucky guy. Avoiding the Dark Knight in his murderous phase.

Wait you really think Batman is trying to save Harley Quinn here?

tumblr_inline_o5he6t3BTR1sypkn8_540.gif


He is dragging her over to his Batmobile to finish the job. It will be up to the Joker to make sure he doesn't get out the flame thrower in time. Murderous Batman know no bounds other than Martha!
 
Wait you really think Batman is trying to save Harley Quinn here?

tumblr_inline_o5he6t3BTR1sypkn8_540.gif


He is dragging her over to his Batmobile to finish the job. It will be up to the Joker to make sure he doesn't get out the flame thrower in time. Murderous Batman know no bounds other than Martha!

What if she reveals her father's name is Thomas as she's staring down the flamethrower? :o
 
A movie where the Joker has to save someone from Batman... I think hell just froze over. :dry:
 
I gotta say, the cape looks so sweet there. I still love the Nolan cloth capes and how they bellowed in the wind, but that image right there looks sexy AF, not gonna lie.
 
In the past I used to give nicknames to versions of certain characters that I didn't like, for comedic purposes. I called Spider-Man 3's Spidey "Raimi-Man" and Rises' Batman "Quitterman".

Wondering what nickname I should give to this version of Bats. Currently Cheneyman and Millerman seem to be my favorite varieties. :o
 
In the past I used to give nicknames to versions of certain characters that I didn't like, for comedic purposes. I called Spider-Man 3's Spidey "Raimi-Man" and Rises' Batman "Quitterman".

Wondering what nickname I should give to this version of Bats. Currently Cheneyman and Millerman seem to be my favorite varieties. :o

Stick with Cheneyman. Millerman implies he has a code against killing.
 
Wait you really think Batman is trying to save Harley Quinn here?

tumblr_inline_o5he6t3BTR1sypkn8_540.gif


He is dragging her over to his Batmobile to finish the job. It will be up to the Joker to make sure he doesn't get out the flame thrower in time. Murderous Batman know no bounds other than Martha!
On a glimpse, it looked like the Burtonmobile.
 
In the past I used to give nicknames to versions of certain characters that I didn't like, for comedic purposes. I called Spider-Man 3's Spidey "Raimi-Man" and Rises' Batman "Quitterman".

Wondering what nickname I should give to this version of Bats. Currently Cheneyman and Millerman seem to be my favorite varieties. :o
Cheneyman wins. Or Bat-Trump as Kevin Smith called him. He hates illegal immigrants!
 
It's amazing how well drawn these characters are. I can only hope one day DC characters can sit around and have talks like this.


[YT]HWxGzxMAGX0[/YT]
 
Could be.

But some of the Batman scenes could be from years ago. If it's all post-B v S, then it looks like he's back to being a little more heroic. But i doubt it will last, and i doubt this changes his Bruce Wayne. I don't see his Bruce acting too different. Im getting used to this Bruce being an A-Hole who doesn't take orders. Is it possible that Supermans death changed him? Sure. But it could only be that, not the Martha moment that changed him.


Why would you doubt that the events of BvS will have changed Bruce? It's not possible that Superman's death changed him because it literally did change him, as is evidenced by the things he says at the end of the film.

The resolution to his fight with Superman (code name: 'Martha') changed and affected him by shaking him out of his misguided rage and mindset, leading him to do the right thing instead of the wrong thing he was hellbent on doing. Superman's death changed and affected him by inspiring him to be better, do better, and to believe again that "men are still good". It also inspires him to seek out and join up with the other metahumans -- something I'm willing to bet the Bruce we saw in the first half of the film would never have considered or agreed to. He also says that he failed Superman in life but won't fail him in death, and I'm sure he means it. (Remember that if Batman had actually been acting like Batman instead of the shell of himself he had become, he would have instead been focused on Lex's nefarious activities and could have potentially stopped Lex from successfully creating Doomsday -- and Superman would have never been killed)

Whether or not you liked how those character moments were portrayed, I don't think there's any sense in doubting that he changed, and all signs point to those changes sticking in future films. I'd be pretty shocked if all of that was somehow undone when we see post-BvS Batman in JL or other films and he just reverts back to the crazed and reckless vigilante he was at the start of BvS.

As far as Bruce/Batman still acting grumpy and being somewhat of an A-hole, I think we can still expect to see that side of him to a certain extent which makes sense. He's not going to all of a sudden turn into a guy who's heart is filled with sunshine and rainbows. This is just kind of how Batman is anyway in terms of how he interacts with other people and other JL members, even in the animated series. He's the "straight" man of the group in a way, with somewhat of a no-nonsense attitude and a gruff manner to him. Plus, he'll be the oldest and most experienced member of the JL, and will be surrounded by a few less-experienced and more bright-eyed individuals like The Flash and maybe Cyborg. I love his dynamic with the other JL members in the comics and animated stories, so I hope that carries over into the JL movie to an extent.
 
Cheneyman wins. Or Bat-Trump as Kevin Smith called him. He hates illegal immigrants!

Eh, I don't know about that. One thing I'll give Trump is that he's not boring. Can't say the same about most of the film. :oldrazz:
 
So regarding WB/DC's films having more creative control, I think there's two things that should be pointed out.

First, studio interference from Marvel Studios is not the same as studio interference from WB. That may sound hypocritical, but it's not when you think about it. Marvel Studios is a relatively small studio composed of Kevin Feige and a few other Marvel fans that run the whole show. Disney for the most part lets them do whatever they want as long as they stay within certain budget constraints. Now it's true that many directors have clashed with Feige's vision in the past, but it's still ultimately a clash between two different creative visions. We can debate which approach is better, but that distinction should at least be made clear. It's not the same thing as someone all the way at the top of WB's food chain interfering in a project based on what they think will generate sales. Marvel has no Cars 2 or Green Lantern equivalent in that sense.

Second, Snyder may have been given free reign, but it's really just a loophole for WB to claim they give their directors free reign. The problem is that Snyder and WB shared very similar attitudes about superhero films from day 1. They both made it clear they dislike Superman and want him to be more like Batman. They both associate moodiness as being "different from Marvel", try to adapt novels like Watchmen that just don't need adapting, and believed audiences will eat up a Batman vs. Superman film on its (poorly executed) premise alone. It's by no means an example of auteur empowerment gone wrong; it's an example of the filtering process that goes on behind closed doors. It's very similar to the way CNN and Fox News select their reporters, if you ask me.
 
Why would you doubt that the events of BvS will have changed Bruce? It's not possible that Superman's death changed him because it literally did change him, as is evidenced by the things he says at the end of the film.
I only doubt it because Snyder has a hard-on for a Batman that acts like an ******* towards everyone, and wants to base his Justice League off of Watchmen. He could change, and see the good in humanity like he says in that final scene, but im not sure if i trust Zack Snyder enough to stick with something. Ill believe it when i see it. For now, you're right, but i have reason to doubt it when i see his murderous behavior in a future Justice League scene (if it is indeed that).

The resolution to his fight with Superman (code name: 'Martha') changed and affected him by shaking him out of his misguided rage and mindset, leading him to do the right thing instead of the wrong thing he was hellbent on doing. Superman's death changed and affected him by inspiring him to be better, do better, and to believe again that "men are still good". It also inspires him to seek out and join up with the other metahumans -- something I'm willing to bet the Bruce we saw in the first half of the film would never have considered or agreed to. He also says that he failed Superman in life but won't fail him in death, and I'm sure he means it. (Remember that if Batman had actually been acting like Batman instead of the shell of himself he had become, he would have instead been focused on Lex's nefarious activities and could have potentially stopped Lex from successfully creating Doomsday -- and Superman would have never been killed)
The Martha bit at the end of that fight changed absolutely nothing. Ill give it to you on the bit where Superman dies. It seems like it changed him, for now. But what does Batman do, immediately after the Martha scene? He flies over an area and blows a bunch of people up. Flying away with an expression on his face that feels like he's either satisfied or it's just another day at the office. "Meh, they were in my way" attitude. Wow, that really changed him!

The death of Supes probably does inspire him to look at the positive side of humanity again. But it didn't inspire him to seek out more metahumans. He did that because of his dream/memory where Flash tells him to find more of them because something is coming. Bruce thinks he was let it on a secret about the future. He's paranoid and getting prepared for something that may happen. It's not because Superman died, and he's all inspired.

Hopefully Superman was the one who helps him get back to the old Batman. But i have a feeling he's still going to act like an ******* towards everybody because Zack probably thinks it's cool as hell.

Whether or not you liked how those character moments were portrayed, I don't think there's any sense in doubting that he changed, and all signs point to those changes sticking in future films. I'd be pretty shocked if all of that was somehow undone when we see post-BvS Batman in JL or other films and he just reverts back to the crazed and reckless vigilante he was at the start of BvS.
All signs point to those changes sticking in the future? Really? How's that? Of course it's logical to think that future Batman won't be killing or branding folks, but since when does Zack Snyder use logic? Anything is possible with that guy. Especially with his Watchmen comments.

As far as Bruce/Batman still acting grumpy and being somewhat of an A-hole, I think we can still expect to see that side of him to a certain extent which makes sense. He's not going to all of a sudden turn into a guy who's heart is filled with sunshine and rainbows. This is just kind of how Batman is anyway in terms of how he interacts with other people and other JL members, even in the animated series. He's the "straight" man of the group in a way, with somewhat of a no-nonsense attitude and a gruff manner to him. Plus, he'll be the oldest and most experienced member of the JL, and will be surrounded by a few less-experienced and more bright-eyed individuals like The Flash and maybe Cyborg. I love his dynamic with the other JL members in the comics and animated stories, so I hope that carries over into the JL movie to an extent.
Yeah. That's fine, but we have Geoff Johns writing a Batman movie where it may be a prequel. You know, when Batman was apparently more traditional Batman. But Johns likes to write Batman like a childish ******* who wants everyone to bow down to him. It could be a prequel or a sequel, we don't know yet. Im willing to bet that Justice League Bats will be the leader but a total pain in the ass to work with in every way imaginable. Im sure Affleck will nail this and look badass, but A-Hole Batman can be exhausting and unlikable after a while. Im kinda looking forward to Flash or Cyborg poking fun at him.

The only glimpse of a compassionate Bruce that i saw in the entire movie was in the first scene where he saves the little girl and hugs her. If they can expand on that, this could be the best Batman ever created for the big screen. But i still have that feeling we will be looking back on this era, years from now, and going "Yeah, he looked badass, there was potential, but it was kinda just a Frank Miller meets Geoff Johns Batman mixed together, with some colder s**t thrown in the mix.."

Suicide Squad could be the beginning of something great for him. But it could also be a ruse. He may save Harley and then do something ridiculous to another character later on in the movie. It's a trailer after all. I bet Joker is not even a character the Squad is after. I have my reasons for doubting all of this, when Batman v Superman gave me a good enough reason to be skeptical about...everything. Especially with characterization.

EDIT: All Batman/Squad scenes could be in a flashback. What bothers me is Bruce could drop the killing b.s, but Joker still won. He still lost, and he can't take it back that he let himself become one of those people. If he stabbed Superman and then found out who he really was, that would make him as bad as Joker. But if it wasn't for MARTHA, he would have stabbed him. If Superman yelled DANA!!!! SAVE DANA!!! I f'n guarantee he would have plunged Supermans chest with a spear 1 second later. It's all chance, and it does bug me.
 
Last edited:
I am dreading a Geoff Johns penned Batman movie.
What the hell has he done with live-action film or in the comics that makes him qualified for writing a Batman movie? That's why i have my doubts because it sounds like he was hired because his version of Batman could mesh extremely well with what Snyder has created. Killing with intention or branding criminals with knowledge of their death in prison..is not the only negative thing about this Bruce Wayne. It's about how cynical and one-dimensional he is. With the exception of that hilarious line/delivery that Ben probably improvised "I like those shoes!!!"..he was one way in public, the same way in private, same way with Alfred. Then when he was Batman, he acted the same way again, only difference was a mask on his face and a voice modulator. Every version of himself or persona was just Bruce being serious, angry and *****ey. Which is great when balanced out. Is Geoff Johns the right guy to stretch out this character a bit? I don't think he is.
 
I think he had a hand in Arkham Knight's story.
And that story is not as well received as people hoped.
 
I think he had a hand in Arkham Knight's story.
And that story is not as well received as people hoped.

Yeah, he made the completely original brand new never before seen we promise character of the Arkham Knight.
 
I dunno, I loved Arkham Knight. After Asylum it's my 2nd favorite game.
 
So David Ayer's Joker is basically a psychotic pimp. It's a refreshing change and im embracing it because Leto is phenomenal. But i have a question..

Is there any truth to Ryan Gosling being offered the role, and he turned it down because it was a 3 picture deal?? I remember reading about Gosling, but i don't remember what site. Im trying to think of Gosling playing a psychotic pimp Joker, and it's interesting. We know he can play mouthy characters who are hilarious when they want to be. I guess you can take his build, face tattoos and dyed hair in The Place Beyond The Pines (great film by the way)...and add some makeup and colorful clothing. But being truly demented, sinister? His laugh? I almost can't see it.

Interesting that Ayer wanted him for the role before Leto. Or was it the studio?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,391
Messages
22,096,412
Members
45,893
Latest member
KCA Masterpiece
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"