chintai80
oh hi.
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2004
- Messages
- 8,032
- Reaction score
- 9,075
- Points
- 103
He didnt? I dont know, Superman killing Zod looks like the easy way out a bit to me.
Maybe its just the way it was done but i never got the feeling that it was really the only way to stop Zod.
I get it was framed that way but over the course of the movie we have seen so much, but im supposed to believe Superman couldnt have stopped Zod any other way?
Why not cover the guys eyes with his hands or using all his strength to fly away?
Im not an expert but snapping someones neck doesnt strike me as easy as folding a paper.
But im looking at that way too hard probably, with that mindset i could question every scene in any movie.
The scene just never worked for me.
i do think the scene probably could have been done better - maybe even with some of the alternative actions you've listed here.
but what i meant bout zack not providing an easy way out - was how lot of times in the comics, they always write it in a way for the hero to save the day and still maintain his moral code.
superman is able to save everyone. batman is able to stop and capture a bad guy. all without having to compromise their codes.
could it have it been written and directed better to show how superman is truly tested?
sure it can. and we'd probably have less debates about it if it were. lol.
but the scene worked enough for me and i appreciate that zack actually went there with the character.
see, i'm not saying zack's some untouchable director. his stuff is flawed and largely an acquired taste.
but i respect that he's willing to go to places with these superheroes that other directors usually won't.
and how much someone prefers that depends on their own personal mileage.