DA_Champion
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 12,106
- Reaction score
- 929
- Points
- 73
NM. I find snark boring but i should accept that other people like it.
Last edited:
Happy Halloween, Guest!
NM. I find snark boring but i should accept that other people like it.
Look we all wanted Luke to have a smoking hot redhead as his wife instead of being a celibate hermit with penguin aliens.Never read the old EU, have you. Because let me tell you, TROS wasn't AI, that was Keven J Anderson as hell.
I'm thrilled to see that there's a new smurfs movie.
I hope it's good.
That part isn't true. That sea creature thing he milked in The Last Jedi was his island wife.Look we all wanted Luke to have a smoking hot redhead as his wife instead of being a celibate hermit with penguin aliens.
There is a major difference between Avatar and Rebel Moon. Everyone I know saw Avatar. It was a cultural milestone and I never doubted Avatar 2 was going to be anything other than a monster. This movie, outside of here on the hype and social media, I haven't met a single person who has watched these movies. Most don't even know what a Rebel Moon is. These are not going to leave any impact at all.
Yes I know, maybe my analogy didn't land, to be clear I know that Avatar is clearly king. Numbers there are objective.
The point of the analogy is that Avatar was anything but king among critics and people who discuss movies online. We by and large had fifteen years of snark about how nobody cares about Avatar, it made no impact, etc. And yet it was a spectacular success as I and a minority of others predicted -- because of viewership among the mainstream public, a group not represented by film nerds (us).
But the fact they're ignored also shows you how little impact they have had on the cultural zeitgeist. Nobody cares about any of this stuff. Rebel Moon is going to be another movie on 10 years absolutely no one talks aboutYes I know, maybe my analogy didn't land, to be clear I know that Avatar is clearly king. Numbers there are objective.
The point of the analogy is that Avatar was anything but king among critics and people who discuss movies online. We by and large had fifteen years of snark about how nobody cares about Avatar, it made no impact, etc. And yet it was a spectacular success as I and a minority of others predicted -- because of viewership among the mainstream public, a group not represented by film nerds (us).
And I think if you look at a lot of movies on Netflix, there's a huge gulf (not as huge) between what film nerds care about and what movie watchers care about. These are apparently their ten most watched movies:
View attachment 89111
Those are some incredibly good numbers, and most of those are either ignored or derided by film nerds. And I wouldn't be surprised if many of the people you know outside the Hype are unfamiliar with them.
Separately, the Super Mario Bros movie has spent 22 weeks (!!!) in the top ten, and it's widely derided among film nerds.
10 years? That's the most generous thing I've heard someone say. It's going to be completely forgotten in a year or even months after the director's cut hit. Barely anyone talks about it now.But the fact they're ignored also shows you how little impact they have had on the cultural zeitgeist. Nobody cares about any of this stuff. Rebel Moon is going to be another movie on 10 years absolutely no one talks about
Until the next attempt at creating their own Star Wars...10 years? That's the most generous thing I've heard someone say. It's going to be completely forgotten in a year or even months after the director's cut hit. Barely anyone talks about it now.
What the **** is the Chalice? If Scargiver and Child of Fire refer to Kora, is it talking about her vagina?Rebel Moon - Part One Director's Cut Seemingly Gets a New Title Along With Its R-Rating - IGN
The director's cut of Part I is being retitled "Chalice of Blood".
Such pathetic over the top juvenile edgelord garbage is so embarrassing from a 60 year old man.
Rebel Moon - Part One Director's Cut Seemingly Gets a New Title Along With Its R-Rating - IGN
The director's cut of Part I is being retitled "Chalice of Blood".
Such pathetic over the top juvenile edgelord garbage is so embarrassing from a 60 year old man.
The entire reason for the title change is so people are fooled into thinking it is a different movie entirely and the click on it for the required amount of time for Netflix to count that as a view before turning it off. It's very blatant
What the **** is the Chalice? If Scargiver and Child of Fire refer to Kora, is it talking about her vagina?
So now Issa is the MC.
Edit: It's still an unnecessarily edgy title but it's not completely random.
I think ol' Hopkins says the word chalice in the opening voiceover of Part 1.
The director's cut of Part I is being retitled "Chalice of Blood".
Such pathetic over the top juvenile edgelord garbage is so embarrassing from a 60 year old man.