Aside from the fantastic cast, why did Sony greenlight this?
Pascal said this on a movie she probably oversaw?The whole movie itself is stale and muddled. I'll just cut and paste my review from a different forum:
"If you're an insomniac, this film is a great alternative to sleeping pills. It meanders, it's too talky, and Alec Baldwin and Bill Murray's characters should've hit the cutting room floor entirely. Those two grind the film to a halt, but that's the least of the film's concerns. Rachel McAdams and Emma Stone are far too good for this movie, while Bradley Cooper's performance is hit-and-miss. At times he has this creepy expression that sent chills down my spine... is he trying to win Stone's character over or gut her like a fish? Then there's this lame thing with John Krasinski's actions and facial expressions are subtitled -- cute idea on paper, but it falls flat in the film."
I disagree with Amy Pascal on many things, but I agree with her on this. Aside from the fantastic cast, why did Sony greenlight this?
The whole movie itself is stale and muddled. I'll just cut and paste my review from a different forum:
"If you're an insomniac, this film is a great alternative to sleeping pills. It meanders, it's too talky, and Alec Baldwin and Bill Murray's characters should've hit the cutting room floor entirely. Those two grind the film to a halt, but that's the least of the film's concerns. Rachel McAdams and Emma Stone are far too good for this movie, while Bradley Cooper's performance is hit-and-miss. At times he has this creepy expression that sent chills down my spine... is he trying to win Stone's character over or gut her like a fish? Then there's this lame thing with John Krasinski's actions and facial expressions are subtitled -- cute idea on paper, but it falls flat in the film."
I disagree with Amy Pascal on many things, but I agree with her on this. Aside from the fantastic cast, why did Sony greenlight this?
Pascal said this on a movie she probably oversaw?
Am I the only one whothinks this of Cooper in general?
I think he's a great actor. I like him and he seems like a decent guy.
But if it was to get out that he was a serial killer I wouldn't be surprised. Maybe it's those icy blue eyes.
In the Sony hacks from last November, in one e-mail Pascal openly disparaged Crowe's script and how the film was turning out.
She was right on the money there.
Wow. I guess it is realistic, but just goes to show studio system for you.
I assume this film got greenlit because it is Cameron Crowe and his name still has some prestige and nostalgia behind it, and he probably got some A-list talent packaged to the project.
This movie and that awful Sandra Bullock one he did back in 2009 were the only ones he did that gave me the creeps.
Well my issue is that Cameron falls into the same trap as his other movie 'Elizabethtown', the movie that helped coined the 'Manic Pixie Dream Girl*'...only to have the same archetype here with Emma's (half-Asian?) character. Was he not aware of that meme? Heck it was totally deconstructed by 500 Days of Summer.
*That quirky fantasy girl who is only there to fix the male lead's life.
Yeah she's half-asian in the movie. Her character's last name is 'Ng', which is Chinese. hah. I think Emma is more of a draw than Oliva Munn, who's actually half Asian. And a bigger star than Kristen Krieuk. Cameron Crowe should've known better or just adjust the script for Emma Stone.
And it sounds like the majority of the cast in the film were White actors, Weird, but not weird.