• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

am i the only one sick of angelina's baby adoption biased?

yellow_card.jpg


Flagrant grammatical misuse of the word "tried". Opposing team receives free kick on goalie from the top of the goal.

jag

I tired to work out the question being asked, but I think we're missing a few crucial words...

heh. like what?
 
heh. like what?

You mean that the phrase 'am i the only one sick of angelina's baby adoption biased?'

doesn't look a bit wrong to you? I'm not even sure what the missing stuff should be.


And leave my i/e typos out of this. I'm a pro. We make mistakes.
 
You mean that the phrase 'am i the only one sick of angelina's baby adoption biased?'

doesn't look a bit wrong to you? I'm not even sure what the missing stuff should be.


And leave my i/e typos out of this. I'm a pro. We make mistakes.

so stop your yapping.:woot:
 
im not even sure what the hell you even want from me:huh: unless your trying to get at why im urked by someone whose doing a good thing, then yeah i see where your coming from.......

I'm asking if you can see the massive gramatical flaw in your thread title that makes it hard to work out what the hell the thread is abou, let alone which side you're on. If you can't see it... damn.
 
Honest to God, I think Angelina is legit with what she's trying to do. She's one of the few celebrities who is a true activist for helping third-world countries, which, I believe, is predominantly why she adopts third-world children.

My guess is that she's doing this because they're coming from horrible conditions. Not that American orphans aren't, but like someone stated earlier in this thread, U.S. citizens are more likely to adopt U.S. citizens- therefore leaving that gap of the foreigners. Angelina has money, and that money gives her a bit of power... She uses it in a good way, instead of the way people like Paris Hilton do.
 
I'm asking if you can see the massive gramatical flaw in your thread title that makes it hard to work out what the hell the thread is abou, let alone which side you're on. If you can't see it... damn.

0o0o0 yeah i catched it, you should stop nitpicking. i'm obviously not a pro like you.:woot:

i can't correct it anyways.
 
0o0o0 yeah i catched it, you should stop nitpicking. i'm obviously not a pro like you.:woot:

i can't correct it anyways.

It took you this long to work it out? Yikes. What happened to reading before posting...
 
It took you this long to work it out? Yikes. What happened to reading before posting...

well to be honest, it did sound a little weird at first when i read it to myself. but i always tend to second guess myself anyways.
 
I wish she'd adopt me. :(

But yeah, I wish Hollywood *****e bags would start caring about American kids. It doesn't matter, she's still hot. :up:
 
Dog Lips needs to ditch that avatar of his. Disgusting :cmad: :woot:
 
so she's adopting a new a baby from Vietnam to add to her collection of third world countries litter. theres nothing wrong with adopting, but im pretty darn sure we have children in the states that needs adopting too. it really urks me when celebrities go to other countires to adopt when we already have kids in the US that needs a loving home. sure its costly, but they can afford it anyways(madonna,brangelina). do you think shes biased towards those other third world kids or is it just me nitpicking.
You are definitely nitpicking, imo. And this thread doesn't make sense. She's doing a good thing and you're calling her bias?

If rich celebrities from this country do not adopt children from third world countries who will? Most of the people from those countries can't even feed themselves and you expect them to adopt their own? Those children deserve as much as a chance as children from the US to have a better life. It is not their fault they were born into such a poor country.

As for children in the US, sure, they deserve to be adopted as well but their chances of getting adopted from their fellow countrymen are better. So what is your problem again?
 
You are definitely nitpicking, imo. And this thread doesn't make sense. She's doing a good thing and you're calling her bias?

If rich celebrities from this country do not adopt children from third world countries who will? Most of the people from those countries can't even feed themselves and you expect them to adopt their own? Those children deserve as much as a chance as children from the US to have a better life. It is not their fault they were born into such a poor country.

As for children in the US, sure, they deserve to be adopted as well but their chances of getting adopted from their fellow countrymen are better. So what is your problem again?


Agreed. Many children from 3rd world countries barley make it past being a toodler while here in the US they have a better chance of living to adulthood.
 
I'm ok with her getting a whole sale deal for adoptions if she wants to take care of them all.

What does piss me off though is that she actually said she's more inclined to care about her adopted children because they had a rough start, rather than that "blob looking" Shiloh (her own words concerning her biological kid) because she was born into a privileged family.

Love them all equally you *****! :mad:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"