Venom 1988
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2004
- Messages
- 11,794
- Reaction score
- 8,068
- Points
- 103
It won't be but it should be.Maybe the 5th trailer is for Shang-Chi! I miss that dude.
It won't be but it should be.Maybe the 5th trailer is for Shang-Chi! I miss that dude.
It's bad because it's cheap bait not that it wouldn't be successful.Aw rats. Look at those bad views when people online say that you're running a horrible marketing campaign. Gee, Marvel and Disney, you sure do suck tonight!
![]()
But really, it shows to go that no matter how good or bad fans think the MCU has been or the marketing for Doomsday is or isn't, they're going to watch the teasers in greater numbers than most of the other MCU films and be in theaters opening weekend.
I find the two clips boring but this strategy of small clips/small trailers is building the hype for the movie. These are basically teasers for a teaser trailer.I’m sorry to say that these teasers have just come off as lame to me. I guess if we had no MCU since Endgame, these would come across a bit more powerful. But it just feels desperate with all the new characters they’ve already built up.
And the Russo’s post-Endgame inspire no hope in me that they’ll be able to pull this off.
I hope for the best, but maybe this is where I feel like the people who go, “does anyone care about Avatar anymore?” and it goes on to make 2 billion.
Thor's dialogue already trumps anything Waititi had him saying in Ragnarok and Love & Thunder.
Then again, the Russos already had a handle on Thor just based on Infinity War.
People probably felt the same about Batman v Superman and Justice League which happened during peak comic book movie cinema.I just can't see this underperforming. It's No Way Home and Deadpool & Wolverine on steroids.
Wtf, really???I just don't like that they seem to be reverting Thor to his IW version.
I would be surprised by a Shang-Chi trailer. But I would like to see it.Im really hoping this is either a Shang Chi or Loki trailer considering both characters haven't been present in any of the trailers yet and unless you watched the chair announcement I doubt most people who don't follow this stuff online would even know they are coming back in the first place. Loki makes the most sense considering he's supposed to have a pretty big role in this but who knows at this point.
I know. My point is that it always was.Except Logan happens in Deadpool's timeline.
Deadpool & Wolverine’s Box Office numbers suggest otherwise.Expected reaction: "Daaaamn, the X-Men in the MCU!!! OMG"
Actual reaction: “... they're still making those?
![]()
19 hours5 hours of the Thor teaser on Marvel’s YT channel.
3.7M views and 370.000 likes
![]()
![]()
They didn’t.People probably felt the same about Batman v Superman and Justice League which happened during peak comic book movie cinema.
Fat Thor didn't annoy me to the level of Waititi-written Thor, honestly.Just going to ignore what they did with Endgame Thor, then....
People probably felt the same about Batman v Superman and Justice League which happened during peak comic book movie cinema.
Also, in the case of Justice League, Doomsday doesn't have the problem of a director leaving midway through due to a personal tragedy and the studio hiring a replacement to basically make a truncated version of said film with a Frankenstein of a tone.This is false equivalence. Those movies came off of a polarizing, underperforming film to begin with. This is a big budget nostalgia fest, which is the main thing that's worked for post-endgame Marvel.
This may underperform, but comparing it to the DCEU doesn't make sense.
This is false equivalence. Those movies came off of a polarizing, underperforming film to begin with. This is a big budget nostalgia fest, which is the main thing that's worked for post-endgame Marvel.
This may underperform, but comparing it to the DCEU doesn't make sense.
Also, in the case of Justice League, Doomsday doesn't have the problem of a director leaving midway through due to a personal tragedy and the studio hiring a replacement to basically make a truncated version of said film with a Frankenstein of a tone.
Expected reaction: "Daaaamn, the X-Men in the MCU!!! OMG"
Actual reaction: “... they're still making those?
![]()
Those were bad movies though, and I highly doubt Doomsday is going to be anything like BvS or Justice League. I don't see Doomsday landing in that same space.People probably felt the same about Batman v Superman and Justice League which happened during peak comic book movie cinema.
It does have a problem of multiple delays and multiple creative pivots. This movie was originally supposed to be called THE KANG DYNASTY
2 days19 hours
YT - 7.8M views / 512.000 likes
Marvel Studios - 20M views / 357.000 likes
Marvel Entertainment - 3.8M / 96.000 likes
Chris Hemsworth - 3.1M / 184.000 likes
![]()
Its going to be a big hit.Highly doubtful
Those were bad movies though, and I highly doubt Doomsday is going to be anything like BvS or Justice League. I don't see Doomsday landing in that same space.
And how many people outside the comic book bubble even knew it was ever called Kang Dynasty?
The overwhelming majority of casual moviegoers, the ones who don’t watch everything Marvel but will always show up for an Avengers movie/event films, (the same kind of crowd that helped Deadpool & Wolverine hit $1.3B), the people who actually move box office, probably have no idea about the whole internal “Kang Dynasty” pivot history.
And even the ones who do know? They’re almost certainly not the majority.
They just see “Avengers Doomsday” and go, “Oh, the next Avengers movie. Yeah, I’m checking that out.”
It's that simple, and the box office will prove this once again.