Go Web Go!
Shhhhhhhh!
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2003
- Messages
- 18,320
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Haha. Within the next decade (or less), people will wonder why Twilight was so popular. I've been wondering why for the last year or so, personally.
Haha. Within the next decade (or less), people will wonder why Twilight was so popular. I've been wondering why for the last year or so, personally.
Anyone who has bad feelings about vampires due to "Twilight" just needs to watch 30 Days of Night to see what vampires are supposed to be.
You always know how to bring me back... and make me feel old at the same time.
****? Crap? Lame?
Apparently we have a difference of opinion as to the quality of 30 days of Night.
Very well then, how about The Hunger, Nosferatu the Vampyre or John Carpenter's Vampires?
It doesn't take much to wipe away the stink of "Twilight".
I perfer that of Bram Strokers original vision... the sexuality of that...
same with Ann Rice.. Lestat was awesome..
If by "Bram Stoker's original version", you mean Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula movie, I'll agree that it's OK, but it is most definitely NOT faithful to the original book, either in events or the depiction of Dracula. And Keanu Reeves, for god's sake.
Both Coppola's Dracula and Rice's sexy foppish vampires are not what the original mythical vampires were supposed to be like. Traditional vampires are evil, stinking, animalistic corpse-spirits that get bloated on blood .
Traditional vampires are evil, stinking, animalistic corpse-spirits that get bloated on blood .