Blexit

[Aximili86]

Zero coverage on this isn't exactly surprising.

 

[AResistor]

You mean the log cabin of uncle toms?

That’s because the vast majority of us minorities don’t care what our whacked out peers are up to man, lol. Most of us look at them like the crazy aunt or uncle.

(In case wondering how I knew, googled - what’s funny is how low right-wing approval among minorities is compared to what it was during W. Bush - it’s almost like reich wingers decided to openly go back years and become the Confederate party we all knew they were due to their welcome embrace of Dotard Dump lol)

The only notable break from D is millennials going further left into Democratic Socialism following the strength in waves of awesome leaders like MLK.

Not to mention whatever you wanna call this - numbers don’t reach #NeverTrump republicans lol. All the white supremacy hurt party rep good. Independent right may see some build up against the GOP though.

Have a good night now man. Peace!

 

[Aximili86]

Yeah, gonna report the "Uncle Tom" thing. Gotta be some consistency around here.

Prettttty sure the "all minorities are mandated to vote Democrat" is pretty racist in itself.

 

[AResistor]

Yeah, gonna report the "Uncle Tom" thing. Gotta be some consistency around here.

Prettttty sure the "all minorities are mandated to vote Democrat" is pretty racist in itself.

Not mandated, just the vast majority of us minorities are smart enough to see from first hand experience the side that keeps on attacking us. Heck, they’re currently waving both confederate and nazi flags around at events like “unite the reich” kinda makes it easy to see (not that it was even remotely difficult before, lol).

Republicans as a party had steady minority support with Bush, lost it with their racist attacks on Obama, and then that Titanic just about sunk the second they ushered Trump through the front door - that is going to taint the party for years. It’s when they became the stereotypical image that so many of us have.

 

[Lighthouse]

Candace Owens is a grifter and pathetic joke.

 

[AResistor]

Candace Owens is a grifter and pathetic joke.

I know that as a minority, if I start up a twitter account as a “hispanic bisexual immigrant gun loving Trump supporter godam patriot!” I’d have right wingers spreading my account like rapid fire. Then it’s just getting the self starters up so I can reap the benefits.

Some are genuine, many others just see how easy it is to con right-wingers into giving us money since they’re so desperate to have a minority that they can claim to stand behind so they can continue to do anything they want to their heart’s desire.

So many minorities know the game and it’s easy money too (what’s so funny is how many right-wingers fail to notice that having “help fund me’s” is a huge sign)! Just, most of us would rather not sell our soul.

Ps. those who are genuine don’t try to make a business out of being the “minority-title right-winger or Trump supporter” to reap in profit - that’s like the “now all I need to see is your credit card” line after a pitch.

A recent case:

Did a Twitter User Scam MAGA Fans Out of Thousands of Dollars?

Hint: it’s easier starting up a new profile (no backlog).

The most amusing sign of Republican desperation though was the whole #walkaway movement - many of those turned out to be bots and fake profiles lol.

Russian bots are back: #WalkAway attack on Democrats is a likely Kremlin operation

They are so desperate for people to walk away that all that walks away is their defense to becoming easily gullible lol.

 

[Aximili86]

She was a lefty like a couple of years ago with the whole GamerGate thing.

Just because she's "evolved" (that's the word you guys like to use, right, Harris & Gillibrand trying to defend their nonprogressive records?) in views, doesn't make your "grifter" & "Uncle Tom" stuff okay. I get it's a bummer, and inconvenient, whoa a black person not a Democrat, the absolute horror, but c'mon fellas.

 

[AResistor]

She was a lefty like a couple of years ago with the whole GamerGate thing.

Just because she's "evolved" (that's the word you guys like to use, right, Harris & Gillibrand trying to defend their nonprogressive records?) in views, doesn't make your "grifter" & "Uncle Tom" stuff okay. I get it's a bummer, and inconvenient, whoa a black person not a Democrat, the absolute horror, but c'mon fellas.

Lol. A lefty suddenly becomes a gung ho right-winger with a merchandising line to boot to help rake in dough and is so far right she even gives classical Republicans pause?

Come on man, you really can’t see the obvious?

There are genuine minority republicans- here’s how you’ll see the difference - they don’t try to profit off of being it lol. No minority tokens themselves “I’m the MINORITY-GROUP Trump supporter, now pay me!” unless it’s to make a possible quick buck off of desperate conservatives.

Let me guess this “Blexit” thing, you had to pay for a ticket for what is basically an elaborate meet up group, right? Not to mention if given the race of who attended, I’m pretty sure most would be white looking for someone to say - “but I have black friends!” Yeah, that’s what most people call a con lol.

 

[Lighthouse]

She was a lefty like a couple of years ago with the whole GamerGate thing.

Just because she's "evolved" (that's the word you guys like to use, right, Harris & Gillibrand trying to defend their nonprogressive records?) in views, doesn't make your "grifter" & "Uncle Tom" stuff okay. I get it's a bummer, and inconvenient, whoa a black person not a Democrat, the absolute horror, but c'mon fellas.

I see you're going back to arguing in bad faith because any person whose done a microsecond of research knows about her doxxing website and that she' was never a "lefty" as you say.

 

[AResistor]

Blexit:

White people vastly outnumber the few black people in what's supposed to be an event (!) about blacks leaving the Democratic party to become Republican. Such a small number of people inside.

You sure you want the news to air this Ax?

This is funnier more than anything else.





Enlarge the picture on the left for a real laugh. This is like some weird 'Get Out' ****.



Ax, I agree - this SHOULD be getting covered by the media, but for how funny it is.

I'd say even more so than how often white people are spotted holding "blacks for Trump" signs:





If you really want to go into the Twilight Zone go to the link on the sign.

 

[jolldan]

I dislike her because she doesn't believe it climate change even though she openly admitted that she doesn't know much about it, I've nothing against someone swapping from left to right or vice versa on the political spectrum but you don't need to adopt every dumb thing that party believes.

 

[2kt09]

She's an opportunist. The sentiment is commendable, but Kanye clearly saw something familiar in her.

 

[AResistor]

I dislike her because she doesn't believe it climate change even though she openly admitted that she doesn't know much about it, I've nothing against someone swapping from left to right or vice versa on the political spectrum but you don't need to adopt every dumb thing that party believes.

Nobody does. Just minorities find it weird and amusing how right-wingers always make a big horse and pony show over it lol, it’s part of what tells us about their desperation. When right wingers throw “events” such as Blexit and attendance is 88% white and white people are obviously holding “blacks for Trump” signs, that’s just amusingly weird.

Hilariously it’d be like the left holding WHEXIT (white people) and CHREXIT (Christians). The left would readily be made fun of and would deserve it for making a horse and pony show over it lol. It’d be even funnier if 88% of those in attendance weren’t white nor Christian a - just minorities going hoping there’d be more. It’s like Funny or Die stuff lol.

Or like right-wingers are always playing a game where minorities are the ever elusive pokemon. Gotta catch ‘em all.

 

[moviedoors]

Why should anyone care about an obvious charlatan like Candace Owens? She’s a minority versioning of Tomi Lahren, and just as vapid and greedy.

 

[AResistor]

Why should anyone care about an obvious charlatan like Candace Owens? She’s a minority versioning Tomi Lahren, and just as vapid and greedy.

Because she threw an event celebrating black people exiting the Democratic party to become Trump supporting Republicans! MSM won’t show that because they don’t want to show how many minorities are becoming Trump supporters!!!



That is why the right is whining all over twitter over no coverage for it lol -

While ignoring that coverage would show it’s 88% white people in a crowd of about 100. I think the media should cover it, just to show who actually was in attendance since that’s hilariously weird and it has eerie ‘Get Out’ optics lol.

 

[Aximili86]

They cover all the other rallies. It's that simple.

Also, 88% white is hilarious. You're only looking at the social media stuff from the people mocking it, picking and choosing what you want. There are craploads of interviews & selfies from not just blacks, but latinos & pacific islanders and stuff out there. 88% my ass, it's more like 50/50.

 

[AResistor]

You're only looking at the social media stuff from the people mocking it

Yeah, Charlie Kirk sure does seem like he's aiming to mock it.

People have eyes Axi. Videos taken by someone promoting it (pretty sure Charlie Kirk helped to host it too) as well as a photo of the auditorium from above (a wide crowd photo has no bias lol).

If there's photographic evidence from another wide shot overlooking the crowd, show us Axi.

It's the same reason people didn't buy the hilarious "Biggest inauguration ever! Just look at all these pictures!" run around right-wingers did - it was amusing more than anything else.

 

[Aximili86]

Oh, I'm sorry AResistor. I'm just referring to the close-ups, picking and choosing handfuls of individuals.

Wide-shots are for sissies. Etc.

Apologies, good sir.

88% white isn't hyperbole, not one bit.

 

[AResistor]

(1) I didn’t post close ups, I posted a wide shot and so did you.... thus, your first two paragraphs are - kinda weird lol. Close ups are easy to create an impression- wide shots gives you all you have.

(2) So - just double checking - you’re saying those pictures are from the recent inaugural Blexit rally that just happened which coincides around your first post?

And if yes, can you post a link showing those pictures were for that event?

Also link that shows where that fourth photo took place? It just - oddly - looks like a different photographer from the others, more professional. It’s cool they dressed up too, makes them stand out especially from the orange and blue shirted crowd.

Come to think of it, the second too. Just it’s amazing that the photographer managed to not get a single orange or blue shirted person in that frame.

 

[AResistor]

Actually I’m feeling nice so I’ll be nice to Axi.

The photos you posted were of the Young Black Leadership Conference back in October where those orange and blue shirts were given out.

Source: Update America (a right-wing news site)

#Blexit: Black Americans Flooding into Republican Party is Bad News for Dems Right Before Midterms

The picture I posted which you tried to pretend was “fake” was from the first Blexit event which coincidences with when you posted the thread.

Source: Briefart

One of the last images is of the same crowd I posted just front on instead of from above, still though I maybe going blind but I’m seeing a lot more white lol.

Exclusive -- Inside the Inaugural Blexit Rally: ‘The Black and Latino Community Will Save America’

My question though Axi, why didn’t you show Blexit photos and why did you try to pass off photos of the Young Leadership conference as Blexit? Especially after saying there were hundreds of photos and videos from this event? (For those wondering - it was also the first one).

 

[Aximili86]

They all came up under the keyword "Blexit" in a totally-hard-to-do 30 second google search, so...

They're wearing the Blexit t-shirts in first, third, and the last one, and the second one's got Owens & Kirk front-and-center. Looks like you're right that the second-to-last one is from a previous event ( further google look has it from this article Kanye West backs Blexit movement in US ), and seems the one with Owens & Kirk front-and-center is from an October event, so yeah, conceded there. They're still Blexit rallies though, so your general point is pretty flawed.

If we want to focus on the Los Angeles one specifically over the weekend in a narrow sense...

[/URL]



The video at the bottom here is about 50/50 in the wider sense (I know it's Breitbart, bear with me, got there on a google search - don't bother reading the article, I didn't, the video's the proof in the pudding):


Exclusive -- Inside the Inaugural Blexit Rally: ‘The Black and Latino Community Will Save America’


Likewise from Twitter, about half-and-half
:





*Shrugs* Just going by what's showing on first-page google here, not sure if there's more out there.

Seems it's about halfway between our positions with the LA one. Thing is, top of this post you've got other previous events from late last year, no matter how you slice it that's not nigh-on 90% honkeys. Had a hard time rustling up a lot of wide shots from Los Angeles, and that does seem a little fishy, actually agreed with you there. But if you're trying to paint this thing broadly (they've had multiple events) as some white-run Minstrel Session or whatever, pretty clearly the photo evidence doesn't back that. Certainly not to a laughable 88% white degree.

And what of yours did I claim was "fake"? The point was basing a "this is a 88% white phenomenon!" off one photo being mocked on Twitter miiiiiight not be the whole story. Which upon further investigation seems to be right. The LA one's a higher percentage of white people, but that's hardly the only Blexit gathering that's happened, and overall those are pretty clearly majority-black.

EDIT: Nobody's "trying to pass off" anything. I looked on google, they were wearing the Blexit shirts, I genuinely figured they were from L.A. Conceded they're from previous Brexit stuff upon further investigation. They're still events organized by Owens, attended by a majority-black audience in her goddamn t-shirts. Seems pretty relevant to me.

 

[AResistor]

Lol. Dude this is Blexit’s first event.

Right Wing Daily Wire calls it the first ever conference and there’s more white people than black people there - that’s weird lol.

Inside Report From The First Ever Blexit Conference: Encouraging Black People To Leave The Democratic Party

The Epoch Times praising it calls it the “first rally”

Blexit Rally Emboldens Conservative Minorities in Los Angeles

Yet you’re saying Blexit has had other events lol.

Heck even Briefart is calling it the first.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...-first-blexit-rally-kicks-off-in-los-angeles/

Do you know anything about this Blexit thing?

 

[AResistor]

Axi - you are really calling the

Young Black Leadership Conference

A Blexit rally lol?

The first one just happened as shown above across right wing news articles.

Also you do know I posted a right wing article about the Leadership Conference right?

Advice: stop before digging a further hole.

 

[Aximili86]

Oh, I'm sorry, the fact they're wearing those orange & green shirts with "Blexit" written on them threw me for a minute, before I corrected. Silly me.

They're a majority-black audience in Brexit shirts. If you want to focus on LA, that's not 88% white either, if you want to broaden it out to similar events, they're far-higher-percentage black and wearing Blexit shirts. Clearly they're affiliated movements.

 

[Sithborg]

[looks at elections 3 months ago]

Why is this something anyone should care about.