EA faces class action lawsuit over Spore's DRM

Timstuff

Avenger
Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Messages
19,914
Reaction score
2
Points
31
EA sued over Spore DRM

* By Tor Thorsen, GameSpot
* Posted Sep 24, 2008 11:16 am PT

Class action filed in US District Court contends that publisher hides fact game installs irremovable SecuROM, violating two California laws.

Ever since Spore was released on September 7, an uproar has been growing. Many gamers have taken great exception to the fact the PC game comes bundled with SecuROM digital rights management software. One criticism is that SecuROM only allows the game to be installed on three computers before locking. As a result of the outcry, EA expanded the number of Spore installs to five PCs last week.

Still, a more persistent complaint is that, once installed, SecuROM cannot be removed. Accusations have also been leveled that the program amounts to malware or spyware, since it monitors computer use to prevent duplication.

Spore's use of SecuROM has sparked a major backlash, with pirates using the DRM as justification to download illegal copies of the title. A recent Forbes article pointed out that the game was widely pirated in the days after its release, with the blog TorrentFreak claiming 500,000 illegal downloads of the game were made in just one week.

Now, two weeks after the illegal response to Spore began, EA faces a new, legal challenge to its DRM policy. This week, a class action suit was filed in the North District of California Court by the law firm KamberEdelson on behalf of one Melissa Thomas and all other Spore purchasers. According to the filing, which was made available by Courthousenews.com, the suit contends that EA violated the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act and Unfair Competition Law by not informing consumers installing Spore will also install SecurROM.

"Although consumers are told the game uses access control and copy protection technology, consumers are not told that this technology is actually an entirely separate, stand-alone program which will download, install, and operate on their computer," read the complaint. "Once installed, it becomes a permanent part of the consumer's software portfolio. Even if the consumer uninstalls Spore, and entirely deletes it from their computer, SecurROM remains a fixture on their computer unless and until the consumer completely wipes their hard drive through reformatting or replacement of the drive."

The suit accuses EA of "intentionally" hiding the fact Spore uses SecurROM, which it alleges is "secretly installed to the command and control center of the computer (Ring 0, or the Kernel) and [is] surreptitiously operated, overseeing function and operation of the computer, and preventing the computer from operating under certain circumstances and/or disrupting hardware operations." The suit also claims the SecurROM takes over a portion of the PC's processing resources "to transmit information back to EA."

The filing asks the judge to certify the action as a class action, and award anyone in it damages equal to the purchase price of Spore and "actual damages, statutory damages, or treble damages." Given Spore's success, paying back thrice its $49.99 price tag could prove costly for EA, which had not responded to requests for comment as of press time.

EA had this coming, and they deserve it! The DRM in Spore is more anti-consumer than it is anti piracy, and I'm glad that it's coming back to bite EA in the butt. Two of my brothers have already bought the game, so if EA loses this lawsuit (which they most certainly should), they could be expecting a nice chunk of change in the near future. Hopefully this lawsuit marks the end of the horrid SecuROM program for good!
 
Gotta love the irony there. Their malware SecureROM install was designed to fight piracy but after people learned of what it did to their computers there were over a 1/2 million illegal downloads PLUS they are getting hit with the lawsuit from people that actually paid for the game.
 
Last edited:
Sweeeeeeet. Once EA fixes Spore that means I can actually buy it.
 
I'm thinking the same thing. I refused to buy the game as long as that POS SecuROM is on there. I'm not going to download it illegally, but it sure is a temptation when that's the only way that you can get it without the SecuROM system.

Maybe if we're lucky the court's ruling will roll over to the PC version of Mass Effect too, but I'm not counting on it. That game is still a pretty big temptation for me to obtain illegitimately...
 
Luckily when I looked into it... there is SO much I had to do to get it illegally. I'd rather just wait until EA eats its humble pie and just puts only the game on the cd.

I mean, it's already illegally out there. They just need to stop being idiots.
 
LOL! Go to google and type in "sign spore lawsuit," and you'll see this! I am not kidding!

spore_spyware.jpg
 
For the record their DRM for Spore didn't even work. The game was leaked with a crack almost a week before it was out. When will game companies realize that DRM is a waste of time. You can't stop people from pirating games (you can have a game cracked in less then a minute) all you'll accomplish is pissing off the people who purchased the game from you who will probably go and pirate it in defiance. If you make a good game people will buy it (Halo 3 and Half-Life 2 were leaked way early and those games did damn fine).
 
It's amusing that DRM actully encouraging piracy but at the same time it seems understandible why they are using this kind of crap, pc games are pirated to hell and back and it's hurting the platform, more devs are making the jump to console.
 
It's amusing that DRM actully encouraging piracy but at the same time it seems understandible why they are using this kind of crap, pc games are pirated to hell and back and it's hurting the platform, more devs are making the jump to console.

You can pirate console games too...

A high end PC can easily outperform a console. That's why PC gaming won't go away anytime soon. If it does go away it'll be their fault. People don't like being screwed over and Spore's DRM was very much screwing them over (You could only install Spore three times) when someone buys a game they should have the right to use that disk until it disinigrates. DRM DOES NOT WORK. Protecting games is just a waste of time and cracking only serves as a hobby for hackers. You have to earn the respect of your customers, make great games and stop treating them like criminals and they will buy from you.
 
You can pirate console games too...

Obviously. It's no were near as difficult to pirate pc games.

People don't like being screwed over and Spore's DRM

Dev's who have been working on a game for 4 years don't like getting screwed over by college student Jimmy Jones downloading it off piratebay the day of release or even pre-release.

. You have to earn the respect of your customers, make great games and stop treating them like criminals and they will buy from you.

The poor/good games argument is rubbish. Demo's\ reviews\word of mouth. If it's a poor game don't buy it, easy. It doesn't justify piracy and it's obviously not poor enough for you to take the time to download it for hours and install a cracked version on your computer.
 
Last edited:
Piracy is illegal. However, so are EA's DRM practices, which this lawsuit will undoubtedly prove. How can EA expect its customers to follow the law when they refuse to themselves? I say blame EA for setting a bad example.
 
I agree that developers don't like getting screwed. However, that doesn't justify including a program with the game that 1) isn't mentioned anywhere on the packaging or in the manual, 2) limits the amount of times the paid user can install the game on their computer, 3) installs itself into the kernel, and 4) can only be removed by reformatting the hard drive.
 
I was intrigued by Spore, but I would never buy the game as long they have this DRM in the game. EA screwed up big time with this.
 
The poor/good games argument is rubbish. Demo's\ reviews\word of mouth. If it's a poor game don't buy it, easy. It doesn't justify piracy and it's obviously not poor enough for you to take the time to download it for hours and install a cracked version on your computer.

It doesn't have to justify piracy. Game developers can't stop piracy and therefore have to learn to co-exist with it. They may lose a couple thousand customers but in the end their anti-piracy measures will end up hurting them more. The majority of people will always purchase their games legally. That should be good enough for them.
 
I agree that developers don't like getting screwed. However, that doesn't justify including a program with the game that 1) isn't mentioned anywhere on the packaging or in the manual, 2) limits the amount of times the paid user can install the game on their computer, 3) installs itself into the kernel, and 4) can only be removed by reformatting the hard drive.

Oh, I'm not supporting DRM. But I can understand why they would take such extream measures.

They may lose a couple thousand customers but in the end their anti-piracy measures will end up hurting them more. T.

Or we may just loose dev's. As consoles aren't as intensely or as easily pirated as pc's. Hurting pc gaming as platform.
 
Last edited:
Oh, I'm not supporting DRM. But I can understand why they would take such extream measures.



Or we may just loose dev's. As consoles aren't as intensely or as easily pirated as pc's. Hurting pc gaming as platform.

If PC gaming died console piracy would become more popular.
 
The Cylons get it. Why can't publishers?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"