AndrewBerger said:
No. A typical Brosnan action sequence was something that just seemed like it was thrown in for the "cool" effect and consist of him running around with a machine gun like Rambo.
The action sequences of Connery, Moore, Dalton and Lazenby were much more creative, made Bond rely on his wits instead of a machine gun and served a purpose for the story.
I didn't know they sold Hatorade in the James Bond section. Brosnan's action sequences pretty much reflect the rest of the Bond series. There really is no deviation from the clasic Bond action formula. They may have been modernized for an ever changing movie audience, or popularized for the 90's, however other than DAD's unfavourable CGI, there really is not much of a difference from the other films. For instance;
Boat/Water Sequences: Thunderball, Live And Let Die, Licence To Kill, TWINE
Ski/Snow Sequences: OHMSS, TSWLM, AVTAK, TWINE
Car Sequences: Just About every Bond movie ever made
Airplane/Helicopter Sequences: YOLT, FYEO, Moonraker, Octopussy, LTK, Goldeneye
Of those four common action set pieces, you're telling me that Brosnan's were the most shallow, worthless scenes of them all? I find that very hard to believe. There are many instances in which each respective Bond uses wit and also throws caution to the wind and goes gung-ho.