TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,593
- Reaction score
- 14,925
- Points
- 103
I say, the less it feels like a Bond film the better.
exactly......TheVileOne said:I say, the less it feels like a Bond film the better.
Kevin Roegele said:However, these things go in cycles, and scaling Bond down in 1974 with The Man with the Golden Gun almost ended the series, so The Spy Who Loved Me was a return to the You Only Love Twice style epic Bond extravaganza. Don't for a minute believe we won't see that style again.
Kevin Roegele said:The more and see and hear of Casino Royale, the more I'm convinced it's a return to the classy, restrained style of the 60's movies (sans the sci-fi elements like lasers and secret bases full of technology).
Which is wonderful.
However, these things go in cycles, and scaling Bond down in 1974 with The Man with the Golden Gun almost ended the series, so The Spy Who Loved Me was a return to the You Only Love Twice style epic Bond extravaganza. Don't for a minute believe we won't see that style again.
Well, wasn't the goal to do something different? We've had 20 films of nearly the same-old cardboard Bond, so why not actually do something a little more unique?Thot said:This ain't no Bond film. Certainly not in the classic sense anyway.
Ever read Ian Fleming's Bond - the one that started it all? That was the precedent for this version of 007, and thus has all the credibility in the world as being a legitimate interpretation of the character.If this is what EON wishes to morph "James Bond" into, then that's their business.
Agentsands77 said:Well, wasn't the goal to do something different? We've had 20 films of nearly the same-old cardboard Bond, so why not actually do something a little more unique?
And what makes it "not Bondian" (aside from Craig's casting, as you would undoubtedly cite as reason #1)?
Ever read Ian Fleming's Bond - the one that started it all? That was the precedent for this version of 007, and thus has all the credibility in the world as being a legitimate interpretation of the character.
Of course it's the ticket sales that determine whether the venture was a success, but that doesn't determine whether CASINO ROYALE is a legitimate interpretation of James Bond as a character.Thot said:Well, we'll see how Craig-faced Bond compares box-office wise with "cardboard Bond". It all boils down to the dollars. That alone will determine whether DC succeeds or fails as JB.
Thot said:After reading this "review" and the other one of the rough cut over at Ain't it Cool, I'm afraid the anti-Craig crowd (myself included) is right. This ain't no Bond film. Certainly not in the classic sense anyway. If this is what EON wishes to morph "James Bond" into, then that's their business. However, for those of us who like him just the way he is, this is the death knell. It'll be interesting to see if Joe-movie-goer embraces it. I doubt it'll fly.
Jack Napier said:Other than the "Bond, James Bond" line, what's the other line involving "*****" that everyone's looking forward to?