hippie_hunter
The King is Back!
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2003
- Messages
- 53,322
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I mean, if Warner Bros. wants to have Nolan's interpretation of Batman be a part of a grander DC Universe, then he will. DC owns Nolan's interpretation, not Nolan.I didn't mean that Batman isn't from the DC Universe I mean that the way they are doing the movie it seems like this Batman as a character couldn't possibly exist in the same world as Flash, Superman, Green Lantern, or Wonder Woman. also we've all seen many interviews where Bale has said he probably won't do any batman movies without Nolan.
Also, while Bale was opposed to the Justice League movie, he was only opposed to it because he wants Nolan to finish up what he started. He's also open to the idea of Batman teaming up with Superman. His opposition is nowhere near as extreme as Nolan's who was so opposed to the Justice League movie even though it has a different Batman.
Also, it doesn't matter if it isn't with Nolan, Bale is contractually obligated to play as Batman one more time.
But again, it wouldn't make sense since the only DC movies that might make up a DC Movie Universe are Superman the Movie, Superman II, and Superman Returns. Green Lantern, Wonder Woman, and Flash haven't even gotten movies yet.You all missed the point of what I was saying and yet a small like like that could be in place especially when in the story part of the plot is bringing the Batman to justice. I didn't say I thought it was something that should be mandatory I just meant it could have been worked in. One little line acknowledging other super heroes exist in a movie about a super hero isn't that far fetched.
How can you say how there are other superheroes out there when there's only one?