Girl posts nude pics, is charged with kid porn

SoulManX

The Inspector!
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
11,028
Reaction score
1
Points
58
TRENTON, N.J. - A 14-year-old New Jersey girl has been accused of child pornography after posting nearly 30 explicit nude pictures of herself on MySpace.com — charges that could force her to register as a sex offender if convicted.

The case comes as prosecutors nationwide pursue child pornography cases resulting from kids sending nude photos to one another over cell phones and e-mail. Legal experts, though, could not recall another case of a child porn charge resulting from a teen's posting to a social networking site.

MySpace would not comment on the New Jersey investigation, but the News Corp.-owned company has a team that reviews its network for inappropriate images. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children tipped off a state task force, which alerted the Passaic County Sheriff's Office.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29912729/
 
I actually think I support charging the girl. Make an example of her for others.
 
Why would the girl put nudes up on MySpace? That's just asking to be caught.
 
pattern.jpg
 
I understand that they want to discourage people from posting underage nudity, but charging a girl who posts her own pictures seems like a bit excessive imo.
 
Thats what she gets. 30 pics?! Are you ****ing crazy, girl? One or two are somewhat reasonable, but thirty?! *****, you's just asking to get caught.
 
No, Don't charge her. She's just A stupid kid.
Besides its not fair for her to be forever associated with adults who have sex withn children
 
Ok, she's stupid. I think we can all agree on that. But being registered as a sex offender? Isn't that a bit much?
 
i thought if you post other naked people you get in trouble.

i didnt know if you post from yourself
 
Ok, she's stupid. I think we can all agree on that. But being registered as a sex offender? Isn't that a bit much?

Yeah, that's my feeling also. That girl may not be very bright, and uploaded nude pics of herself, but that doesn't make her a sex offender.
 
Thats what she gets. 30 pics?! Are you ****ing crazy, girl? One or two are somewhat reasonable, but thirty?! *****, you's just asking to get caught.

That's what I was thinking and I bet she has more pics on her pc or phone or something so maybe it's a good thing busting her or better yet ban her from using a PC/cellphone for a few years. I imagine she would rather be in jail then losing her internet privileges and such
 
That's what I was thinking and I bet she has more pics on her pc or phone or something so maybe it's a good thing busting her or better yet ban her from using a PC/cellphone for a few years. I imagine she would rather be in jail then losing her internet privileges and such

Well, once she's in jail she won't get any internet, so I think she'd rather just have the internet taken away instead being in jail. :oldrazz:
 
Yeah, I do sort of agree that charging her as a sex offender is a bit too harsh, but she definitely needs to be punished.
 
Yeah, I do sort of agree that charging her as a sex offender is a bit too harsh, but she definitely needs to be punished.

Take away her computer, phone, and ground her for a month without TV. She'll be begging for mercy afterward. :hehe:
 
Well, once she's in jail she won't get any internet, so I think she'd rather just have the internet taken away instead being in jail. :oldrazz:

Wrong, inmates are allowed to use PC in jail. Hell some of the jails have so much perks it's more like a hotel for them then punishment :whatever:
 
Wrong, inmates are allowed to use PC in jail. Hell some of the jails have so much perks it's more like a hotel for them then punishment :whatever:

That ain't right. :down
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
201,164
Messages
21,908,476
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"