That's one sliver of the story, and only benefits Americans, and I'm skeptical about even that part.
The paradox here is that the oil companies need to keep going strong in order for money to keep being plowed back into the financial system and to keep cash circulation strongish (among numerous other industries). But with the plethora of factors affecting oil production and price, not least of which is the decreasing supply, you have an increased price (lately) which benefits the companies but completely shafts the consumers. It's very much in the consumer's best interest for the price to be low, because the higher the price goes the more they're paying not only for fuel but also for other products because distributors pass their increased transportation costs (i.e the rising fuel) onto the consumers as well.
Combine the complex economics, which I did a very bad and simplistic job of explaining, with the various political motivations that exist for oil-using countries to stay on good terms with oil-producing countries and you have a volatile melting pot of economic and political variables that need to not be disturbed lest the already delicate economy be turned into an even more comprehensive cluster****. Cheap petrochemical products are bad. Expensive petrochemical products are bad. Petrochemical products are bad.