• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

House approves drilling in AWR

Kritish

Avenger
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
21,604
Reaction score
1
Points
31
WASHINGTON -- Citing the public outcry over $3-a-gallon gasoline and America's heavy reliance on foreign oil, the House on Thursday voted to open an Alaska wildlife refuge to oil drilling, knowing the prospects for Senate approval were slim.

Drilling proponents argued that the refuge on Alaska's North Slope would provide 1 million barrels a day of additional domestic oil at peak production and reduce the need for imports.

But opponents to developing what environmentalists argue is a pristine area where drilling will harm caribou, polar bears and migratory birds, said Congress should pursue conservation and alternative energy sources that would save more oil than would be tapped from the refuge.
The House voted 225-201 to direct the Interior Department to open oil leases on the coastal strip of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - an area of 1.5 million acres that is thought likely to hold about 11 billion barrels of recoverable oil.
 
They are probably using this as a bargaining chip for alternative energy research grants.
 
Don't worry, I saw the other day on T.V. where Earth-One President Bush said he opposed drilling in AWR.

Unfortunately Earth-Two President Bush disagrees with him. :(

Just like how they don't agree on nation-building.
 
Maxwell Smart said:
Don't worry, I saw the other day on T.V. where Earth-One President Bush said he opposed drilling in AWR.

Unfortunately Earth-Two President Bush disagrees with him. :(

Just like how they don't agree on nation-building.

So which one's going to die? Or is Ike Moore going to try to combine them in his quest for a perfect earth?

Or is E2 Bush going to die in a dilling escavation?
 
This is bulls***!! They have the means to produce vehicles that do not run on natural gas but yet they don't institute mking cars that run on other souces readily available to consumers. This planet is all going to go to hell!
 
Godzilla2000 said:
This is bulls***!! They have the means to produce vehicles that do not run on natural gas but yet they don't institute mking cars that run on other souces readily available to consumers. This planet is all going to go to hell!

Most of the world's supply of natural gas comes from Iran.
 
Godzilla2000 said:
This is bulls***!! They have the means to produce vehicles that do not run on natural gas but yet they don't institute making cars that run on other sources readily available to consumers. This planet is all going to go to hell!

At the moment natural gas isn't very practical. They should be working on hydrogen fuel.
 
Lord Siva said:
At the moment natural gas isn't very practical. They should be working on hydrogen fuel.

And they are, but the cost is still too high.
 
Superman4ever said:
So which one's going to die? Or is Ike Moore going to try to combine them in his quest for a perfect earth?

Or is E2 Bush going to die in a dilling escavation?

Theres gonna be a restart at the beginning of '09, with a new President. :o
 
Godzilla2000 said:
This is bulls***!! They have the means to produce vehicles that do not run on natural gas but yet they don't institute mking cars that run on other souces readily available to consumers. This planet is all going to go to hell!

It was prophesized!

We've had the tech for years, for alternative fuels, but when lobbyists play! We went from horses to automobiles in several decades there is NO way that an anti-gravity belt doesn't exist yet. :mad:
 
Lord Siva said:
At the moment natural gas isn't very practical. They should be working on hydrogen fuel.

I just wonder why American Leaders have such interests in keeping oil rich countries in business when we should be plying knowledge into creating fossil fuel free vehicles that don't damage the environment.
 
Superman4ever said:
You clicked the link, didn't you! :)

No. I wasn't asking you about "Earth 1" "Earth 2". I've searched my usual news outlets and have yet to see this report.
 
Iceland has been working on hydrogen engines and are already outfitting ships with them.
 
Godzilla2000 said:
I just wonder why American Leaders have such interests in keeping oil rich countries in business when we should be plying knowledge into creating fossil fuel free vehicles that don't damage the environment.

1. There is no current alternative to fossil fuel vehicles.
2. Research is being done, but until they become viable, there is no alternative.
 
Godzilla2000 said:
I just wonder why American Leaders have such interests in keeping oil rich countries in business when we should be plying knowledge into creating fossil fuel free vehicles that don't damage the environment.

War Lord said:
1. There is no current alternative to fossil fuel vehicles.
2. Research is being done, but until they become viable, there is no alternative.

PLEASE!

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money-savers/article.html?in_article_id=403819&in_page_id=5

Video: http://www.metacafe.com/watch/128967/water_as_fuel/
 
War Lord said:
1. There is no current alternative to fossil fuel vehicles.
2. Research is being done, but until they become viable, there is no alternative.

Oh, there is an alternative to fossil fuels. It's the military hoarding the science behind it.
 
Godzilla2000 said:
Oh, there is an alternative to fossil fuels. It's the military hoarding the science behind it.

I shouldn't have said that there no alternatives, because there are. However, the economics behind the alternatives still make them unviable.

For example, hydrogen still costs about 11 dollars a gallon, retail.

The reason why the military might be "hoarding" is because the costs are still too high, which only the military can afford because of the amount congress gives them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"