Moon Craters Could Be Coldest Place in Solar System

Galactus

Devourer of Worlds
Joined
Sep 1, 2000
Messages
16,277
Reaction score
1
Points
31
By Andrea Thompson
Senior Writer
posted: 18 September 2009
01:12 pm ET

The coldest place in the solar system might be closer to home than we thought.


New data from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) suggests that permanently shadowed craters at the moon's south pole might be colder even than Pluto and the other objects in the solar system's furthest most reaches.


In its first set of measurements, announced Thursday, LRO's Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment, which is conducting the first global survey of the temperature of the lunar surface, found that craters along the lunar south pole that have areas permanently shielded from the sun's light (and suspected to harbor deposits of water ice) have extremely cold temperatures.


"Diviner has recorded minimum daytime brightness temperatures in portions of these craters of less than -397 degrees Fahrenheit," said David Paige, Diviner's principal investigator and a UCLA professor of planetary science. "These super-cold brightness temperatures are, to our knowledge, among the lowest that have been measured anywhere in the solar system, including the surface of Pluto."


While it may seem odd that the moon, which is much closer to the sun, could be colder than Pluto, it's not at all unexpected, one planetary scientist said. In fact, the poles of Mercury may be even colder.


"The key point is not their distance from the sun, but the fact that there are regions at the poles of the Moon and Mercury that never see the sun, and so never get heated by sunlight," said Alan Boss, of the Carnegie Institution in Washington, D.C.


"The only heat they receive is from the underlying rock, but that means only interior heat leftover from their formation or their internal radioactive decays, but in any case the local rocks are still cold because they too are free to radiate out to -263 Celsius space without getting any heat back from the sun," Boss told SPACE.com.


The news of these frigid temperatures bolsters the idea that these craters could harbor water ice, which would be a boon to any future moon bases, which could melt the water and use it for drinking, or extract hydrogen for fuel.


The ultra-low temperatures of these craters are the opposite of those at the lunar equator, which are hotter than the boiling point of water at noontime.


Lunar surface temperatures are expected to change with the seasons, and Diviner will continue to monitor and map them throughout LRO's planned one-year mission.


LRO was launched on June 18, along with its companion, the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS). LCROSS will impact one of these lunar craters, Cabeus A, on Oct. 9 to generate debris that can be analyzed for signs of water
 
So in other words, your dinner is cold.....




I wanna see the equipment they use to determine these things.
 
How is this even possible. The Moon is closer to the Sun than Pluto is.
 
There's a reason they said "might be colder" in reference to Pluto. Because of the lack of light in the part of the solar system, we don't have a clear picture of Pluto yet - we don't know if there are parts of the pygmy planet that are shielded from the sun like these craters on the moon.
 
Well this is either neat or worthless. It's neat if we plan on doing anything with this knowledge but worthless if we don't plan on using it.
 
If we end up going to the moon again, the info is likely to be used.
 
Do we even have equipment that could withstand temperatures that low enough for us to utilize whatever frozen ice might be in those craters?
 
Just hurry up and build a big ass ship so that a group of people could go far out into the universe, have kids and train them to do their job, etc...to find cool stuff. Quit measuring temperature in a crater:cmad: I want damn awesome science!!!
 
Looks like that place is a....*puts on glasses*

Cool place to kick it.

yeah!
 
I don't think Astronauts will be playing in craters anyways.
 
Planning on a moving rover by 2020 is hardly progress. We should be making regular trips to the moon by now, but it's hopeful at least.
 
I'm just glad they still have people interested in funding NASA programs
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"