• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

No More Black Holes?

its interesting to propose, however proving it using math...? theres a thing called dark matter that we have no idea what it is and its 99% of the universe. we cant even prove half the things in space what makes them think they can disprove black holes? ill be interested to see how it turns out.
 
Oh, I thought the title read "No More Black Hoes" :( I was getting worried for a minute!
 
i swear that the first time i read the name of this topic i thought it was about black hookers.
 
Hmmm...I thought photons had no time, so now I wonder what happens when light actually does get "trapped" in the black hole

But either way intersting article but it doesn't really explains the phenomena anyway,so its kind of redundant
 
So, to sum the article up, scientists still don't know what a black hole is.

jag
 
For those that don't know the center of a blackhole is labeled a singularity. A singularity is a place where time and space become infinite in all directions. The Big Bang also came from a singularity.

I have often wondered how Hawking Radiation could escape the strong gravitational pull of the black hole.

Something I have often wondered about is what if matter entering a blackhole actually travels backwards in time to the point of the big bang, and that's where all of the matter which came from the big bang, came from.

What if all of those singularities inside of black holes are one and the same. What if they are the same singularity that the Big Bang erupted from, and that's where all the matter came from. What if it came from the Black holes which came into existence after the big bang, causing the Big Bang, and our entire universe to be one big time paradox.
 
i'm so sick of phycisists... they say whatever they want, backed up by "mathematics" and everyone thinks it's the truth.... well, phooey, i say.

mathematics prove that 2+2=4... that's about it, as far as i'm concerned... granted, more is possible: quickest curves of descent, xyz axis, all that. etc... but saying 2+2= time travel is stupid... i don't care how long you've been in a wheelchair, you don't know what's going on in space. you could go through a black hole and come out the other end as a sock, for all we know.

i'm sick of theories... just because someone is generally considered 'smart', we're supposed to believe what they say.... i mean, string thoery? how dumb is that?!
 
please, everyone who is reading this post, please look up the word theory. some people have a serious misconception of the definition. this has not been proven by the way, therefore its not a theory. it is being published in a journal, it is simply a mathematical formula. if it does in fact become a theory, i will be surprised.
 
please, everyone who is reading this post, please look up the word theory. some people have a serious misconception of the definition. this has not been proven by the way, therefore its not a theory. it is being published in a journal, it is simply a mathematical formula. if it does in fact become a theory, i will be surprised.
:up:

Same problem in the discussion of the theory of evolution. Swear to God, some so-called evolutionists make the rest of us look very, very bad.
 
For those that don't know the center of a blackhole is labeled a singularity. A singularity is a place where time and space become infinite in all directions. The Big Bang also came from a singularity.
You're telling me. :whatever: Fall in and you get spaghettified. Been there, done that. I like worm holes. :up:
 
please, everyone who is reading this post, please look up the word theory. some people have a serious misconception of the definition. this has not been proven by the way, therefore its not a theory. it is being published in a journal, it is simply a mathematical formula. if it does in fact become a theory, i will be surprised.

Theory means conjecture, supposition, not fact.
 
Theory means conjecture, supposition, not fact.
He didn't say that it does. A theory, by scientific standards, has been supported several times in separate instances by observation. While it certainly isn't fact, it isn't simply an unsupported idea or thought, as many take it to be.
 
the·o·ry
premium.gif
thinsp.png
/ˈθi
thinsp.png
ə
thinsp.png
ri, ˈθɪər
thinsp.png
i/
Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[thee-uh-ree, theer-ee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -ries. 1.a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity. 2.a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact. 3.Mathematics. a body of principles, theorems, or the like, belonging to one subject: number theory. 4.the branch of a science or art that deals with its principles or methods, as distinguished from its practice: music theory. 5.a particular conception or view of something to be done or of the method of doing it; a system of rules or principles. 6.contemplation or speculation. 7.guess or conjecture.
 
...and we see there that theory, in the scientific sense, is different from the more general definitions. FTW.
 
nobody listens to the first part of the definition, only the last 2. and thank you for looking it up.
 
i'm so sick of phycisists... they say whatever they want, backed up by "mathematics" and everyone thinks it's the truth.... well, phooey, i say.

mathematics prove that 2+2=4... that's about it, as far as i'm concerned... granted, more is possible: quickest curves of descent, xyz axis, all that. etc... but saying 2+2= time travel is stupid... i don't care how long you've been in a wheelchair, you don't know what's going on in space. you could go through a black hole and come out the other end as a sock, for all we know.

i'm sick of theories... just because someone is generally considered 'smart', we're supposed to believe what they say.... i mean, string thoery? how dumb is that?!
And that's why you are not considered 'smart'
this has not been proven by the way, therefore its not a theory.
Isn't that wrong?
 
not in the scientific sense of it, but in the whole throwing ideas around sense then yes, it is wrong. take it as you will.
 
not in the scientific sense of it, but in the whole throwing ideas around sense then yes, it is wrong. take it as you will.
I thought it was scientific theory till it becomes scientific fact.
 
...a theory is never proven. Only supported. Almost nothing in science is ever proven.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"