• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

The Amazing Spider-Man Rank all of the Spider-man movies (including ASM)

ASM is...

  • better than all 3 previous SM movies

  • better than only 2 previous SM movies

  • better than only 1 previous SM movie

  • the worst SM movie yet


Results are only viewable after voting.
Hm...

SM2
TASM/SM1
SM3

I rate TASM and SM1 because they both got aspects of the origin right and wrong. Had this been to SM3 what Batman Forever was to Batman Returns, it would've been a clear winner over SM1.

Oh, and I was a fan of the reboot idea.
 
1. The Amazing Spider-Man
2. Spider-Man 2
3. Spider-Man 1
4. Spider-Man 3
 
As a 'movie' SM2 is better than ASM but there are elements in ASM that blow SM2 out of the water, the characterization of Spidey is WAY better in ASM.
 
As a 'movie' SM2 is better than ASM but there are elements in ASM that blow SM2 out of the water, the characterization of Spidey is WAY better in ASM.

For me, that's why SM2 still tops ASM on my list. As a film, ASM was not as cohesive or thematically sound as SM2 was.
 
The Amazing Spider-Man : 8
Spider-Man 2 : 8
Spider-Man : 7
Spider-Man 3 : 5
 
For me, that's why SM2 still tops ASM on my list. As a film, ASM was not as cohesive or thematically sound as SM2 was.

Plus, Peter stopping the train, that's probably the best scene of all the movies. It's going to be hard to top that.
 
Spider-Man 1 - 3/4
Spider-Man 2 - 4/4
Spider-Man 3 - 2/4

1. Spider-Man 2 - 4/4
The best comic book movie made to date. It is just glorious. I literally have only a couple of minor nit picks. If TDKR tops TDK, SM2 may finally be dethroned.

2. Spider-Man 1 - 3/4
A good movie and a good start. Hasn't aged as well as SM2.

3. Amazing Spider-Man - 2.5/4
Wow what a let down. It just barely squeaks by SM3 due to Andrew and Emma.

4. Spider-Man 3 - 2/4
Just a terrible entry in the amazing series....a massive let down. However, I have seen some fan edits that make it better than ASM. But as it stands...big ball of bleh.
 
1. Spider-Man - 10/10
2. Spider-Man - 9/10
3. The Amazing Spider-Man - 6.5/10
4. Spider-Man 3 - 6.0/10
 
The Amazing Spider-Man - 8.5
Spider-Man 2 - 8
Spider-Man - 7
Spider-Man 3 - 3.5
 
Better than only 2 movies. SM2 is still king.

SM2: 9.5
TASM: 9
SM1: 7
SM3: 3
 
Gave it another watch, story feels pretty organic even with what I didn't see because some scenes were removed, and I mean removed because 2 hours out of the 2:20 were shown here, so I don't mean directors cut

Better than all 3 of the Raimi films, and that's great to be honest, even better since I love all three films
 
I went back and rewatched Spider-man 1 and then TASM again, just to do a comparison and here is what I would say is the breakdown.

SM1 is a more faithful rendition of the Lee/Ditko/Romita books, with the exception of the organic webshooters. This is classic Spider-man, but I'm wondering if some prefer TASM simply because with Ultimate SM, the character has changed quite a bit.

Both Maguire and Garfield had very different takes on the Peter Parker character. There's a line right at the beginning of Amazing Fantasy 15, that Peter Parker is the "wallflower of Midtown High", and I think Maguire really based his performance based on that. Just an akward kid who doesn't know how to act or what to say around others. Garfield's performance is much more based off the Ultimate books where Peter is more brash and outspoken, but still gets picked on. Again this goes back to the difference that TASM is really a mix of 616 and Ultimate SM, where as the Raimi films were pure 616.

As far as the Spider-man character, I think Raimi's version gets far too much flack for Spider-man not being the brash character he was in the comics. There are some good lines that are classic to Spider-man, like "hey kiddo why don't you let mom and dad talk for a while." But I think people feel there should have been alot more of this, so in TASM they went completely in the opposite direction. I will say this is one area where I did prefer TASM, especially the school fight where peter says "don't make me hurt you" while getting tossed about and smashed into walls, that was classic Spider-man.

The big problem to me is how Peter gets his powers. In TASM when he wakes up on the train and ends up on the roof, he goes through several scenes where it seems like he's not even aware he has spider-powers. When he goes to track down Uncle Ben's killer, he's fighting guys and then all of a sudden discovers he can climb walls, even though twice before he had stuck to surfaces on the train and when he was practicing skateboarding.

This was all handled far superior in the Raimi films where the transformation takes place while he sleeps and wakes up and slowly through the day notices strange things. Despite what anyone says the scene where Peter looks at his hands and sees the tiny barbs sticking out, that was absolutely brilliant. Sorry folks thats how spiders climb surfaces not ionic bonding which is what static charages, and polar attraction does which has nothing to do with Spiders.

Now as for the webshooters, I do prefer what was done in TASM. I thought it was handled well it's too bad they screwed up the rest of him discovering his powers.

As far as villians, Willem Dafoe takes the cake here. Despite what you think of the suit, Dafoe was one of the all time great baddies in Marvel's films. It was very much in line with what Hugo Weaving did for Red Skull. Just a guy who is freaking nuts and has an ego to match. This is not a character who is a good guy and goes in sane. Look at the part where he berrates Harry in the car for flunking out of public school and Dr. Strom for wanting to take the performance enhancers back to formula. Dafoe's physicality just makes the roll perfect.

Not to mention the fact that when the Goblin first makes his appearance at the World Unity Festival, and he's riding in on his glider with the large smoke plume behind him, it was like that scene was literally lifted off the comic book pages.

While I love Rhys Ifans as an actor, the script writers screwed up his character royally, and leaving his wife and son out is just plain unforgivable. So much lost opportunity just to retell an origin story.

The problem with TASM is it has more in common with Batman Begins than it does with Spider-man. The only thing that saves the movie is a fantastic performance by Andrew Garfield, and that is literally the only reason to watch this movie.

Bottom line Raimi's Spider-man is just a more complete film, where TASM has a good performance of Spider-man from Garfield, but everything else feels stale and rehashed.
 
To be fair I think this should've only been compared to the first Spider-Man since they both deal with the same storyline. But here goes

1) Spider-Man 2
2) Spider-Man 1
3) Amazing Spider-Man
4) SM3

If SM3 hadn't turned into a trainwreck of a film I would've rated it higher. I really didn't enjoy ASM all that much.
 
Tony Stark pretty much nailed my perception of ASM, the good and the bad, and how it relates to the Raimi movies ...
 
1. Spider-Man 2 (9/10) -- Great story based on the comics (Spidey: No More, Doc Ock's origin) that had both the goofy fun of 1960s comics and some restraint that Raimi would lose on his third outing. It also was character driven, focused on its main cast like they were the neurotic New Yorkers of a Woody Allen movie and improved on the action, pacing and villain characterization of the first film. Still has hands down, inarguably the best fight scenes in any Spidey, or even superhero, film to date (bank/building scene and especially the train/bell-tower sequence).

2. Spider-Man (8/10) -- A near-perfectly told origin film. It got almost every single detail of Spidey's origin right and told it in a snappy, time-efficent way that was always fun and engrossing. The second half suffers from the villain being underdeveloped, as well as having a crappy costume, but his personal relationship with Peter/Spidey makes it work and it flows well with some great iconic moments still in the film like the upside down kiss, the death of GG, and the final swing.

3. The Amazing Spider-Man (7.5/10) -- Essentially a remake of the 2002 Spidey film, it does some things much better (Peter/Spidey's characterization, development of the love interest, high school life, etc.) and some things much worse (death of Uncle Ben, thrust of the origin, overall pacing). While I love the Lizard, he's even more underdeveloped than the GG and the second half of the film is so poorly edited/strung-together it makes SM1's pace look like a masterpiece of editing. If you want to focus just on faithfulness of Peter/Spidey's character, I can see why you'd prefer this film. But as an overall movie, it is less iconic, well-put-together and as fun as the original.

4. Spider-Man 3 (6.5/10) -- Not as bad as the Internet makes it out to be. Critics had it mostly right in 2007, it is a very flawed and awkwardly told film. But it has enough heart and humanity that it works, because you like the characters and care what happens to them and it has enough sequences that do work (Harry's arc, Venom's birth, all the CGI-scenes with Sandman) that it somewhat makes up for its awful screenplay. Is it mediocre? Probably. But it's still fun and entertaining and not nearly the Batman & Robin/Wolverine/X3 POS fanboys make it out to be.

My rankings.

I agree 100% with the ranking scores and explanations for them. :yay:
 
Perfect origin, with Spider-Man allowing a man to fall to his death. Isn't that something The Punisher would do? Sadly, Raimi's origin includes Sandman as Uncle Ben's killer, oh, Spidey letting him go scott-free. Spidey's ok with killers and letting people die, kewl. :dry:
 
©KAW;23845641 said:
Perfect origin, with Spider-Man allowing a man to fall to his death. Isn't that something The Punisher would do? Sadly, Raimi's origin includes Sandman as Uncle Ben's killer, oh, Spidey letting him go scott-free. Spidey's ok with killers and letting people die, kewl. :dry:
Yea, the Sandman thing in the final chapter essentially ruins the entire meaning of the first film and Spider-Man's origin.

In my mind it is as lazy, overly convenient and stupid as Tim Burton insisting on making a major villain the catalyst for the creation of Batman by making the Joker the killer of the Waynes.
 
better then all 3 of raimi's films

TASM might have some flaws but i felt andrew made a good peter parker and spiderman, while with raimi's films i really couldnt see toby as peter parker
 
Even though I know most don't give much credence to it, here's how all of the Spider-Man movies rank according to IMDB...

7.7 - The Amazing Spider-Man
7.5 - Spider-Man 2
7.4 - Spider-Man
6.3 - Spider-Man 3

And for those who are wondering, TASM probably won't drop much as it gets more votes. At worst it'll probably end up at 7.5.
 
Even though I know most don't give much credence to it, here's how all of the Spider-Man movies rank according to IMDB...

7.7 - The Amazing Spider-Man
7.5 - Spider-Man 2
7.4 - Spider-Man
6.3 - Spider-Man 3

And for those who are wondering, TASM probably won't drop much as it gets more votes. At worst it'll probably end up at 7.5.

Spider-Man 2 used to be at 7.6 on there until recently.
 
It did? I thought it was tied with SM1 at 7.4 for the longest time.
 
Yea, the Sandman thing in the final chapter essentially ruins the entire meaning of the first film and Spider-Man's origin.

In my mind it is as lazy, overly convenient and stupid as Tim Burton insisting on making a major villain the catalyst for the creation of Batman by making the Joker the killer of the Waynes.

Not even close.

Bruce Wayne's story didn't change at all like Peter's did. By making Sandman the killer, Peter basically was all wrong by feeling guilty and by chasing that mugger.

But having a man called Joe Chill or a man called Jack Napier didn't change anything in terms of Bruce's motivations and decisions.

That said, how was the Sandman killing Uncle Ben overly convenient?
 
Am I the only one that thought Spider-Man 2 was overrated? It had more Sam Raimi cheese than my grandmother's colonoscopy-requiring mac and cheese. Sure, that's what Raimi goes for in 90% of his movies, but it was distracting. Reminded me is the second half of Thor, or Nightmare on Elm Street 5. It was still good, don't get me wrong. But all of that distracted me from the substance of the movie.

And to all of you rating Spider-Man 3 higher than a 4/10, I respect your opinion, but I think you should watch it again and try not to laugh then entire time. Tobey MacGuire couldn't act confident if he was hung like a horse. The only choice for Eddie Brock that would've been worse than Topher Grace would have been Kathy Bates. Completely changing who killed Uncle Ben, on a whim, was pathetic writing. And worst of all, it had Kirsten Dunst in it. I exaggerate, sure. But it's so close to the verge of being true, I figured it was worth it. Spider-Man 3 is on par as the worst follow-up movie in a series with Caddyshack 2, The Phantom Menace and Friday the 13th Part 5. I usually pretend it didn't happen.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,960
Messages
22,042,935
Members
45,842
Latest member
JoeSoap
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"