CConn
Fountainhead of culture.
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2004
- Messages
- 57,619
- Reaction score
- 12
- Points
- 58
How were they not good, Captain Dismissive?Heh heh. Okay.![]()
How were they not good, Captain Dismissive?Heh heh. Okay.![]()
How were they not good, Captain Dismissive?
I can respect most of that opinion, but Ian Holm was amazing as Ash. I'd actually go so far and say that it is the best performance in the original films outside of Sigourney Weaver as Ripley herself. Bishop is just a more likable and flashier character in that movie.
That's better.They just came off cold and one dimensional to me. I realise there was no time to flesh them out (with the exception of Cobb). Not saying Inception was bad, just not for me.
They just came off cold and one dimensional to me. I realise there was no time to flesh them out (with the exception of Cobb). Not saying Inception was bad, just not for me.
Everyone always tells at me when I say that.That was done on purpose.
The entire movie is a dream.
Everyone always tells at me when I say that.![]()
That was done on purpose.
The entire movie is a dream.
You know what convinced me? The fact that Cobb never uses his own Totem in the film. The simple fact that it was someone else's totally invalidates its credibility as a safety line to reality.Whether it's true or not I don't know. But it's what I choose to believe.
This presentation is what convinced me.
[YT]ginQNMiRu2w[/YT]
I will leave the movie for a long time and then revisit it years from now.
I think this movie would have flowed better if he removed the 'Her majesty's secret service' bit which all but took me out of the movie the action was so bad. In a movie where they are setting up so many new rules the action needs to be brilliant (Matrix) or removed (Dark City) although I did like the anti-gravity corridor.
You know what convinced me? The fact that Cobb never uses his own Totem in the film. The simple fact that it was someone else's totally invalidates its credibility as a safety line to reality.
Oh, and the musical cues too.
Then I also read this article discussing how the film is allegory for moving making, and how by having us actually care about nothing more than a dream is making a philosophical point about how and why we care about fictional characters in movies. Which seems to be what that video is also about.
Um, it is overwhelming. Just as its overwhelming that Decard is a replicant.I also chose to believe things are real. Total Recall is real, Inception is real, Deccard is real. I always go with reality unless the evidence is over whelming in favour of the dream and I don't think it is in Inception.
Besides why didn't Cobb just fly his kids to France?
The other thing I love about Inception is its truly a complete film.
The plotting is complex and multilayered.
The story has a very deep and multifaceted meaning and moral.
It has incredible cinematography where every shot could be its own work of art.
The costuming is immaculate; a conglomeration of the most classic looki of Hollywood costume design.
it has an amazing score that actually adds to the movie greatly.
It - obviously - has some of the best actors in Hollywood in it.
Etc.
It's a film I can go back to and it gets better with each viewing. I compare it to Blade Runner in that regard. Always new stuff to find. I love movies like that.
it has an amazing score that actually adds to the movie greatly.
I felt cheated when I saw it for the first time, the movie was sold as Matrix 2 (well that's what the adverts looked to me) so that's what I was expecting and it certainly isn't there so I felt crushing disappointment (I was also taken out of the movie by the action which bored me). I really like act 1 (level 1) where they are explaining all the rules and you get the corridor fight. Act 2 lost me. The snow section bored me to tears and by time we reached level 3 and the deepest part of the dream I was checked out of the movie.
As I said I need to go back to this movie but only years from now.
The snow fortress sequence does run on a little too long. I can see why you may have been bored. The Dark Knight (the ferry scene) I felt could have been trimmed down as well.
The OHMSS sequence wasn't in the second act.Absolutely, the ferry sequence is indulgent and could have been trimmed but that sequence was in act 3 and I was already invested in the movie whereas the HMSS section is in act 2 and I was ALREADY processing lots of information from act 1, I really didn't need a (bad) action sequence which (for me) ruined the flow of exposition from act 1.
Imho Nolan should have pushed the gun section of HMSS into act 3 or binned it altogether just them do what they need to do without leaving the fortress.
If Nolan struggles with action then don't have action, I don't need action in a Chris Nolan movie.
That's a bold assertion. I like it.Alien/Prometheus
Aliens
Alien 3
Alien Resurrection