Someone Kill Me! Man In A Suit Might Work! Watch!

[DACMAN]

He shouldn't be this big, and he should look more like the comic book version with better makeup effects. But you know...someone kill me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8MjBU2sNK4

 

[DACMAN]

Yeah, never mind. I take it back. I watched a clip from HULK the movie, and then that again. I'm an idiot.

 

[Still Down]

LOL nice t:

 

[Symbiote Hulk]

CGI beats suit any day. I don't remember seeing that seen in scary movie 3...was there an alternate ending feature? The aliens were quite nice and kicked ya in the nuts to say:"Hello".............

 

[kedrell]

I believe that's a man in a suit + forced perspective.

 

[Man-Thing]

not to be mean, but he looks like he has downs syndrome.

 

[Spade]

OhMyGodNo. This video is a great reason why not. The transformation looks completely unrealistic whereas the CGI transformation actually looked like Bana was 'becoming' the Hulk. The movements are silly and unrealistic to the Hulk in such a bulky suit. The facial attempt to capture the orgrish look makes him look like a doddering brute. And the list goes on and on...

I'll be completely honest- the only thing right with this is the green tone. Everything else is why MIAS is a bad idea in today's cinemas.

 

[RedIsNotBlue]

Haha yeah I remember that froma deleted scene from Scary Movie 3. It was most likely what sparked the interest of the development of the Superhero spoof movie in production.

 

[kedrell]

^Personally I don't think that spoof's going to work. Spoofs work best when they're spoofing what would normally appear to be material that isn't funny, like airplane disasters, crime dramas, etc. Superheroes are already a bit tongue in cheek so I don't think it'll work as well.

 

[RedIsNotBlue]

A superhero spoof movie would be awesome. But considering that Zucker just did that piece of **** movie that is called Scary Movie 4 my expectations have dropped very low.

 

[FelixLeiter]

That's great, for a suit. CGI just happens to be much better. Now if someone wore that to a Hallowe'en party I'd be impressed.

 

[webhead731]

Green Giant lol.

 

[Dragon]

Okay. I don't really know why I'm surprised- but I am- that someone would hold up a design from a COMEDY up as an example of a Hulk suit. This was meant to be funny. Not accurate. Not cool. FUNNY.

Anyone who thinks that this- Or Hyde from League (Again, meant to look comedic) is the limit of the technology is just silly.

 

[Nivek]

He shouldn't be this big, and he should look more like the comic book version with better makeup effects. But you know...someone kill me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8MjBU2sNK4

Um, I uploaded this clip just to show a man in suit wouldn't work.

 

[Spade]

To DACMAN's defense, he's already seen why this is a bad example. I'm guessing either that it was a non-serious Scary Movie example or something along those lines. But, anyways, his second post shows he's not "upholding" it.

 

[Nivek]

I'm confident that unless it's a top notch special fx make-up designer like Rick baker doing it, it's going to be a mix between this clip and LXG's Mr. Hyde (which was developed from throw away Hulk movie ideas by Steve Johnson).

 

[DACMAN]

Okay. I don't really know why I'm surprised- but I am- that someone would hold up a design from a COMEDY up as an example of a Hulk suit. This was meant to be funny. Not accurate. Not cool. FUNNY.

Anyone who thinks that this- Or Hyde from League (Again, meant to look comedic) is the limit of the technology is just silly.Ok,

READ MY SECOND POST!!!

 

[DACMAN]

To DACMAN's defense, he's already seen why this is a bad example. I'm guessing either that it was a non-serious Scary Movie example or something along those lines. But, anyways, his second post shows he's not "upholding" it.

Thanks.
At least someone knows how to read beyond the first post of a thread.

 

[xwolverine2]

He shouldn't be this big, and he should look more like the comic book version with better makeup effects. But you know...someone kill me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8MjBU2sNK4

this is proof that suit is the most ******ed thing to ever do......

PERIOD

 

[Dragon]

READ MY SECOND POST!!!

I read your second post, which is my point. My point is that you and others are looking at this example and saying that this is why a suit WON'T WORK when this isn't a reasonable example. It's like holding up Woody from Toy Story and saying "that's why CGI wouldn't work".

 

[Nivek]

I read your second post, which is my point. My point is that you and others are looking at this example and saying that this is why a suit WON'T WORK when this isn't a reasonable example. It's like holding up Woody from Toy Story and saying "that's why CGI wouldn't work".

I'm in the FX industry, and I tell you with full confidence, that unless the money and accomplished talent are invested in doing a man in prosthetics as the character, it will look no better than this or Hyde. Anything less than the best is Sub-Par when it comes to a character like this who's pretty much a Supersized Human being with exagerated proportions. So unless someone wants to invest 50+ million into just designing the Hulk and Abomination and making EVERYTHING on the costumes work the way they should, it's going to look pretty B-movie.


After being all for doing make-up FX on the first move for the character, then being blown away with the CG Hulk model (except his scale), I can say either do the FX right, or just stick with CG.

I think we all just want some more Physical interaction with the Hulk and people next round, I just dont want it to look cheap.

 

[Dragon]

I'm in the FX industry, and I tell you with full confidence, that unless the money and accomplished talent are invested in doing a man in prosthetics as the character, it will look no better than this or Hyde. Anything less than the best is Sub-Par when it comes to a character like this who's pretty much a Supersized Human being with exagerated proportions. So unless someone wants to invest 50+ million into just designing the Hulk and Abomination and making EVERYTHING on the costumes work the way they should, it's going to look pretty B-movie.


After being all for doing make-up FX on the first move for the character, then being blown away with the CG Hulk model (except his scale), I can say either do the FX right, or just stick with CG.

I think we all just want some more Physical interaction with the Hulk and people next round, I just dont want it to look cheap.

And how do you come to your conclusions? How do you know it would cost 50 milllion dollars to make a convincing set of prosthethics? How do you even know exactly how they intend to do it? Who says its going to be from head to foot a costume? It might only be certain prosthretic areas put on an actor to add to his musculature. The fact is that none of the people here going on about suits or CGI know jack about the process and are only speaking from their very limited and imagination-lacking POV.

Furthermore, the truth is that for alot of people, the CG simply didn't sell. I personally never thought I was looking at a living being on the screen, which is one among many reasons I didn't like the first film.

Now of course, the film will have to have mixture. there simply shots you can't create without CGI, such as wide angles of the Hulks mountain swallowing leaps. Like Leterrier is saying you have to have a combination of techniques to make it work.

 

[Mister Sinister]

Probably pretty cheap (if it was expensive, it wouldn't have been deleted). So imagine potential in a big buget production.

 

[DACMAN]

I read your second post, which is my point. My point is that you and others are looking at this example and saying that this is why a suit WON'T WORK when this isn't a reasonable example. It's like holding up Woody from Toy Story and saying "that's why CGI wouldn't work".

Ohhh......sorry...my bad. I totally misunderstood you. My bad.

 

[Dangerous]

terrible.