Matt
IKYN Guy Groupie
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2000
- Messages
- 80,934
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 31
I forgot your proclivity for the mediocre.
I am actually curious to see how Cirie and Sandra will do. If Sandra played either of her seasons today, she would've lost both. Pearl Islands because it would've been a final three and Fairplay would've beaten her. Heroes vs Villains because, it seems anyway, bitter juries are slowly becoming a thing of the past. They will no longer reward goats and players who adopt the "anyone but me" strategy that Sandra is famous for. As the jury's treatment of Hanna and Ken showed, the jurors no longer respect that. It has been consistent in the past 5 or 6 seasons. The game has evolved past it. With a modern Survivor jury, Parv probably would've won (as Russell just went out of his way to piss folks off).
So I am curious to see how Sandra will do in the modern game. I actually expect her to be an early ouster.
Cirie, I am a bit more curious about. She has a strategic mind. Not as good of one as she pretends, but a strategic mind none-the-less. But the game she played nearly a decade ago isn't the game that exists today. Survivor is played at such a higher level by nearly all players. I foresee her being either an early ouster (as she doesn't contribute much to camp life or challenges) or an early juror, just as she was in Heroes vs Villains.
All that said, both should be weary of the fact that they are so far out of the game. Neither has played the game in 6 years and this cast is probably going to be primarily made up of players of the past 3-4 (recency bias tends to be huge in all-star seasons). Being as with Second Chance, there were so many pre-made alliances of recent players who simply knew each other from their involvement in the community, it might prove an uphill battle for players who have been out of the Survivor circle for so long.
I am actually curious to see how Cirie and Sandra will do. If Sandra played either of her seasons today, she would've lost both. Pearl Islands because it would've been a final three and Fairplay would've beaten her. Heroes vs Villains because, it seems anyway, bitter juries are slowly becoming a thing of the past. They will no longer reward goats and players who adopt the "anyone but me" strategy that Sandra is famous for. As the jury's treatment of Hanna and Ken showed, the jurors no longer respect that. It has been consistent in the past 5 or 6 seasons. The game has evolved past it. With a modern Survivor jury, Parv probably would've won (as Russell just went out of his way to piss folks off).
So I am curious to see how Sandra will do in the modern game. I actually expect her to be an early ouster.
Cirie, I am a bit more curious about. She has a strategic mind. Not as good of one as she pretends, but a strategic mind none-the-less. But the game she played nearly a decade ago isn't the game that exists today. Survivor is played at such a higher level by nearly all players. I foresee her being either an early ouster (as she doesn't contribute much to camp life or challenges) or an early juror, just as she was in Heroes vs Villains.
All that said, both should be weary of the fact that they are so far out of the game. Neither has played the game in 6 years and this cast is probably going to be primarily made up of players of the past 3-4 (recency bias tends to be huge in all-star seasons). Being as with Second Chance, there were so many pre-made alliances of recent players who simply knew each other from their involvement in the community, it might prove an uphill battle for players who have been out of the Survivor circle for so long.