Alpha and Omega said:
Does anyone really even watch much news programming anymore? Lately, I've decided to pass on it. It's one continually depressive segment after another.
I don't mind some of MSNBC (Brian Williams was a good replacement for Brokaw). BBC world news on MPT is also a pretty good program imo. Cnn has gone downhill completely, though they're not as one-sided as Fox, and I seem to find more common sense in the critical reasonings of Stewart and Colbert.
Do you think that serious journalism will ever make a resurgence, or will we just see the state of the media descend further and further?
So, how bad is it in your opinion?
I left the media during the OJ debacle. I thought it was about to hit its low point and would soon be rebounding... but I was wrong. It's only gotten worse.
With multiple media outlets competing for viewers and advertising dollars 24 hours a day... the media no longer reports what is newsworthy and what we as a society need to know... they 'create' news. The blow things out of proportion and make them more important than they really are.
One of the best examples of this is 'health' reporting. Look at 'bird flu' and all the 'hype' surrounding it. How many humans has it actually been passed onto? Less than 100? What was it doing topping the news and what were all the "how to keep your family safe" shows for? You likely have more risk of having a piano dropped on you than getting bird flu. And you sure as hell have a much better chance of dropping dead of a heart attack from sitting in front of the TV chomping on that big mac than getting bird flu.
People are never given an accurate assessment of their risk. The same is true with a lot of 'investigative' reporting... especially that focusing on 'consumer alerts and scams'.
There's also no information given about sources so that people can make up their own minds.
For example during the most recent Hezballah/Israel thing... we'd hear casualty figures where Israel said that x many Israeli soldiers (and occasionally Israeli citizens) were killed and then we'd here that x many civilians were killed in Lebanon (funny how we rarely, if ever, heard that Hezballah figheters were killed
). According to who? Hezballah? If that's the case, isn't it possible that some of the people they're calling civilians really weren't? Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that there weren't any civilians killed in this conflict, but I want to know the source for the figures... because I think it's just possible that Hezballah might have an agenda that could be strengthened by 'fudging' on the definition of 'civilian'.