Mr. Sinister05
Civilian
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2005
- Messages
- 260
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Yeah, I agree that Sinister would be easier to incorporate.
If Apocalypse is gonna be used, I think that it would be best to set things up for his revealing (maybe something along the lines of what I suggested in my second post) rather than just suddenly introduce him as a major villain.
Furthermore, I think Apocalypse should be brought in if it's leading into a Days of Future past type storyline.
As I said in the Age of Apocalypse thread (at http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showthread.php?t=218361&page=3) I'd like this storyline if:
If Apocalypse is gonna be used, I think that it would be best to set things up for his revealing (maybe something along the lines of what I suggested in my second post) rather than just suddenly introduce him as a major villain.
Furthermore, I think Apocalypse should be brought in if it's leading into a Days of Future past type storyline.
As I said in the Age of Apocalypse thread (at http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showthread.php?t=218361&page=3) I'd like this storyline if:
The Age of Apocalypse storyline would progress the series nicely. Big characters dying off and everything changing is what'll be needed for it to work though. However, this is unlikely to happen since many comic fans don't like change or anything that doesn't allow for things to return back to the status quo. A lot of fan boys would rather see things flatline into mediocrity than seeing a movie that would make sacrices (such as a hero character dying for instance) to keep the story moving and break off from formula.
This is why franchise based comic movies have alot to overcome in order to break away from a summer popcorn munching flick.