William Wallace vs. King Leonidas

SuperKoala

Civilian
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
Points
11
scotland-wallace4.gif
300b.jpg


who do you think would win in a fight?:boba:
 
William Wallce, he shoots fire from his eyes and lightning from his ass.
 
You beat me to it.

Btw, this is a unfair match-up. A fairer match would have been King Leonidas vs. Achilles (Troy). :o
 
Leonidas didn't do anything near as impressive as Achilles

and Wallace's sword would tear right through Leonidas
 
Leonidas. Think of it this way:

Wallace and his army took out hundreds of English soldiers.

Leonidias and 300 of his troops took out THOUSANDS.
 
yea leonidas would str8 ripgut wallace end of story
 
Wallace was grounded in the real world. King Leonidas from 300 was not. As characters, William Wallace is no different from one of us that could do a good job wielding a sword. King Leonidas is apart of a warrior civilization. The Spartans were the greatest and most tactical warriors, and with 300 men, defeated thousands. Like MMJRK said, Wallace and his army of hundreds took out hundreds of soldiers. Leonidas with his 299 fellow Spartans took on thousands of the Persian empire, which had many different varieties of armies and fighting styles, let alone not being grounded in the real world.

...that's just me.
 
William Wallace.

Undying courage. That man would win.
 
MAXIMUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Between the two, William Wallace though.
 
Although it would be a fair fight, I think Leonidas is a bit stronger, which gives him the edge.
 
Leonidas, Wallace isn't a greek god. In 300, Leonidas practically was.
 
I think Leonidas would win, but it would be very hard I mean Wallace has that massive ass Claymore for a sword.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"