Depends on the movie. 99% of the time it's not worth the extra charge.
More into Star Wars or Star Trek?
Star Wars overall, but I like Abrams' Trek better than Star Wars.
What if Episode VII has too many flashbacks?
Then I would think it was a lazy device for when screenwriters don't have original ideas and are trying to fall back on audience nostalgia for the previous films.
Would you rather remake The Dark Knight Rises to improve it or Spider-Man 3? Who would you consider replacing (actor or character) in both movies?
While I did have some issues with The Dark Knight Rises, overall I think it's much, much better than Spider-Man 3, so SM3. I wouldn't especially replace an actor, just overhaul the story. The first third or so is okay. It's mostly when Venom comes in that it gets wonky (probably because he was shoehorned in against Raimi's will). For one, the whole ridiculous Saturday Night Fever-esque "Dark Peter" would go bye-bye. Gwen Stacy too because she was completely superfluous. The stupid butler's revelation that didn't make any sense.
How do you define a loser?
Someone who does not aspire to be better than they are. Someone who depends on others their entire existence. Someone who does not take responsibility for their own actions. Someone who doesn't lift a finger to make any kind of effort.
Is sanity standard or is it in the eye of the beholder?
Eye of the beholder. Some people think I'm wacky, and I think some other people are really hard to wrap my brain around.
What might give you a reason to bump your head into the wall?
Some people's utter stupidity and people who wear their ignorance like a badge of honor. Homophobia disgusts me, for one example (and I'm not talking about people who just believe marriage is between a man and a woman, I'm talking about people who are truly hateful of complete strangers for an absolutely ridiculous reason).
