Prison Mike
Don't drop the soap!
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
- Messages
- 45,093
- Reaction score
- 7,128
- Points
- 103
Rylance was my favorite character. Anytime I chuckled was because of him.
They could have just thrown subtlety out the window and cast Jesse Eisenberg.Same. It was actually my least favorite character because the voice and mannerisms were too similar. This is one place they should have cast a bit younger for a more Zuckerberg type
I figured he was an amalgam of Bezos, Musk, and Zuckerberg.Same. It was actually my least favorite character because the voice and mannerisms were too similar. This is one place they should have cast a bit younger for a more Zuckerberg type
Likewise. Mostly obnoxious, blunt and tonally all over the place.Can't say it was too far off the mark on where we're at right now, but as a movie I found this both obnoxious and depressing.
It’s a mix of Strangelove and Mars Attacks with a dash of Idiocracy like you say.My review
At the Movies with Kane and BN
3.5/5
While I totally get where some people don't like about it, I still had fun with it. It's more in line with Idiocracy with a giant cast than anything.
I can buy wealthy elites and world leaders will rather put our resources into saving themselves rather than actually dealing with the destruction of Earth.I really enjoyed Don’t Look Up. But if I had to cite a weakness, it would be in regards to “scientific plausibility.” Specifically, I’m thinking of the post-credit scene wherein human refugees (including the president) land on a distant, Earth-like planet. I.e., it struck me as obvious that any civilization capable of multi-century, interstellar travel would have little difficulty deflecting a comet. Now, this sort of complaint is often cast as dull nitpicking. But in this case, the post-credit scene was (IMO) unnecessary. Granted, it was modestly humorous; but I think its levity detracted from the (importantly) somber climax. In other words, being more scientifically accurate wouldn’t be an exercise in pedantry; I think it would have improved the movie’s impact and message.
I can buy that. But I can’t buy they wouldn’t have weapons or some kind of security detail. You land on an unknown planet and just assume you can pet the wildlife?I can buy wealthy elites and world leaders will rather put our resources into saving themselves rather than actually dealing with the destruction of Earth.
They're humans and dumb. We just elected them to govern us and pay them billions to make the happy rectangles of hot people taking selfies.I can buy that. But I can’t buy they wouldn’t have weapons or some kind of security detail. You land on an unknown planet and just assume you can pet the wildlife?
yeah, it felt more like a tv show or series... a Hollywood movie, nope.The movie that points of the consequences of a divided country and each side believing its own narrative is getting hate from the very people this movie is talking about. How about that ?
I have to say.. although this is not Mckay's best movie, it is one that i enjoyed a lot. It would have probably bombed big time if it came out in theatres though.