terry78
My name is Stefan, sweet thang
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 88,379
- Reaction score
- 8,384
- Points
- 203
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Working in the Software Department at my store, I've heard quite a few complaints from people who upgraded from XP to Vista.
"My printer stopped working."
"My scanner stopped working."
"I couldn't find my DVD drive."
"My games don't work anymore."
Ahhhhh, poor Windows Sufferers.
jag
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/et-tu-intel/index.html
June 25, 2008, 5:08 pm
Et Tu, Intel? Chip Giant Won’t Embrace Microsoft’s Windows Vista
By Steve Lohr
Intel, the giant chip maker and longtime partner of Microsoft, has decided against upgrading the computers of its own 80,000 employees to Microsoft’s Vista operating system, a person with direct knowledge of the company’s plans said.
The person, who has been briefed on the situation but requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of Intel’s relationship with Microsoft, said the company made its decision after a lengthy analysis by its internal technology staff of the costs and potential benefits of moving to Windows Vista, which has drawn fire from many customers as a buggy, bloated program that requires costly hardware upgrades to run smoothly.
“This isn’t a matter of dissing Microsoft, but Intel information technology staff just found no compelling case for adopting Vista,” the person said.
An Intel spokesman said the company was testing and deploying Vista in certain departments, but not across the company.
Intel’s decision is certain to sting Microsoft because the two companies have worked closely to align hardware and software from the earliest days of the personal computer. Indeed, the corporate duo is known as “Wintel” in the PC industry.
Could Intel change its mind? Quite possibly. Microsoft’s chief executive, Steven Ballmer, has few equals as a forceful, persuasive salesman, and he and Paul Otellini, Intel’s chief executive, meet regularly.
Word of Intel’s lukewarm response to Vista appeared Monday in The Inquirer, an irreverent London-based technology Web site.
Intel is hardly alone in its reluctance to embrace Microsoft’s latest operating system, which was available to corporate customers in November 2006 and to consumers in January 2007. Large companies routinely hold off a year or so after a new version of Windows is introduced before adopting it, waiting for initial bugs to be eliminated and for applications to be written. “But by 18 months, you’d expect to see a significant uptake, and we haven’t seen that,” said David Smith, a Gartner analyst. “There’s not much excitement.”
His Gartner colleague, Michael Silver, said that about 30 percent of corporate customers skip any given new version of Windows. But the percentage will be higher for Vista, Mr. Silver predicted. Gartner’s corporate clients that plan to skip Vista, like Intel, do not see value of this upgrade, particularly since it requires new PC hardware at the time when the economy is weak and corporate budgets are tight.
Still, Microsoft doesn’t seem to be suffering too much from the resistance to Vista by some large corporations. Microsoft says there are more than 140 million copies of Vista installed on machines worldwide. Consumers and small businesses simply get the operating system that is on a new machine when they buy a PC, and that is Vista.
Meanwhile, the Microsoft operating system engine chugs on, phasing out the old and proclaiming the new. The company reiterated this week that, despite some customer protests, it would halt shipments of the previous version of Windows, XP, to retail stores and stop most licensing of XP to PC makers next week. Microsoft also announced that the next version of its operating system, Windows 7, is scheduled to go on sale in January 2010.
I want to switch to a Mac, but I'd just end up putting Windows on it to use a majority of the software and games on the market.
Is it just me, or are Macs completely irrelevant to what's going on in this thread and needn't have been brought up or discussed at all?
I play City of Heroes and will soon play Champions Online (both Windows games). I use Microsoft Works because it allows me to 'open' and 'save as' Word 2003 and Excel 2003 documents for only $40, whereas I'd need to actually shell out $140 to get Office Home & Student on a Mac just to share Word files. I'm fairly certain my digital camera's software disc doesn't have a Mac installation. My mp3 player is by Creative (less expensive than an iPod), which doesn't support Mac. The Nintendo Wi-Fi USB Connector I use to get my Wii and DS online doesn't support Mac (or Vista, for that matter). And while Garage Band looks like an awesome program, I'd need to hold on to my Acid Music Studio just to continue my old mixing projects. Not to mention I'd have to trade in my SimCity 3000 for SimCity 4.And then you'd slowly start using OS X more and more, discovering alternative programs to the ones you're used to, and love the experience so much you'd find yourself spending less and less time in Windows.
jag