AICN has an early review!

Discussion in 'Superman Returns' started by rene_artois, May 5, 2006.

  1. Showtime Your Friend In Time

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    41,466
    Likes Received:
    4
    The first REAL early review of SUPERMAN RETURNS!


    Hey folks, Harry here... About 3 weeks ago we got the review of SUPERMAN RETURNS that has begun appearing on a few sites around the web. I felt it was suspicious so we didn't run it. Then Moriarty got his hands on a script, circa about February of 2005, that was a budget draft with a lot of action taken out and a lot of dodgy to terrible scenes left in.

    I began contacting some of the people behind SUPERMAN RETURNS to see what they thought. First off - that alleged review? Total bull****. There are several moments mentioned in that review that never even made it to in front of the camera, but happen to be in the draft that Moriarty read... which means... that reviewer is a liar... flat out, that read an early flawed draft of SUPERMAN RETURNS then set out to maliciously slander and cause harm to SUPERMAN RETURNS.

    The draft in question is a draft of this film that nobody in the production was satisfied with. Anyone familiar with Hollywood understands the concept of a "budget draft" which is the draft of the film where you begin cutting out costly scenes that don't directly affect the main plot of the film, but would significantly lower the cost of the film. Having said that, the feeling Moriarty got reading it was genuine and his assessment was correct - based upon that draft. However, that was not the film that was shot. A great deal of that script was shot, but action scenes were added, dialogue changed, the movie evolved.

    Now - I have spoken personally with 3 different people that have seen SUPERMAN RETURNS. Two are primary folks responsible for it's creation - they're beaming proud of the film. Of course they are. However, they made the movie and while they've been incredibly honest with me in regards to the film... They are making the movie. The third was an employee at DARK HORSE ENTERTAINMENT, who saw an extended cut of the film and it blew him completely away. This is someone that has no direct ties to the film. Who isn't involved in it's creation and who had nothing to gain or lose by telling me his honest opinion as we shared a dinner at Chuy's here in Austin.

    Then there's this review. It is FILLED with spoilers. Complete spoilers, but it was written by someone that saw the film and has been frustrated with the negative buzz coming from folks that have not seen the film and have not read a shooting script. In short... This is someone that saw one of the 3 micro-test screenings that have taken place of SUPERMAN RETURNS. This is a WARNING - There are SIGNFICANT SPOILERS throughout this review. SO BEWARE! Personally I have the utmost confidence in this film. It will be something to see.


    I saw this movie 2 months ago in South L.A. but I didn’t bother to write a review. But I just saw Moriarty’s mini script review and felt compelled to set the story straight. I really liked this film, long as it was (about 2 and a half hours!) and it kinda ticked me off that it seems to be getting a bum rap. A fake negative review? C’mon. Well I’m going to set the story straight, and that is that this is a very good movie.

    This is not Batman Begins, and despite what you might be led to believe, the overall tone is a lot like Superman 2, if not a little bit more serious. It's big and fun, but it has a heart. The love story is the basis for almost all of it’s drama, but what Singer cleverly has done is added a new element, and it is what will make most fans say “wow. Superman really ISNT all that boring”. He’s given Lois Lane not only a boyfriend, but a child! On paper, that sounds AWFUL. Lois lane? A mother! WHAT! Well yeah, that’s how it is, if your really narrow minded. What the child does is cement the fact that lois has MOVED ON and superman’s never ever had to deal with this problem before, and that is what makes us able to relate to him, the fact that we all have dealt with this very problem before. This adds a huge element to the movie and makes a much more mature film than you’d think. Instead of the standard "loves her but cant have her” love story, here’s a story where he DID have her and he blew it, and now he’s trying to rekindle the relationship. I don’t really get why some fans have such trouble grasping that, unless your one of those geeks that’s never been in a relationship so you obviously wont relate to this problem. But seeing Superman being jealous, while it might not be exactly what he does in the comics, makes the movie better. Giving Superman the slightest “edge”, or as some fans have said, making him emo-it all makes Superman much more relatable;he’s no longer just somebody who can do everything he ever wanted to. We know exactly what he’s going though, and Singer really took time to hammer home that fact and it totally pays off. That’s where the film gets really good, when they finally seem to be hitting off again, Luthor comes in and totally messes up everything, and the solution involves a lot of superman.

    And ya know, Im not dumb. The fans know Superman is the kids father. But in the movie it is not bad. Your almost wishing he is the father, just because you know he is supposed to be with Lois. Like with Peter Parker and Mary Jane, Peter is taking a backseat to guys like Flash Thompson of John Jameson and you as the audience want Peter to get with MJ even it means hurting his good friend Harry; it’s the same here. You accept he has a kid so he can be with Lois. And people, don’t be surprised. They don’t have to outright say “Lois and Superman had sex” to get the point, either. Basically here Superman takes a backseat to Richard and Jason, and he’s never done that, so it’s very, very interesting and refreshing source of drama for a superman movie. And ya know, there are going to be people who just flat out dont like it. Thats fine.But this not a bad film by any means, and I doubt the public think of it as bad either.

    Ok, so now that that **** has been explained and cleared up, I’ll move onto the plot, performances, and the action and special effects. The music obviously was not finished and neither were the fx, but it was easy to tell what was happening in the scenes. The plot is simple. Superman returns to Earth and has to juggle his ruined relationship with Lois while Lex Luthor is trying to kill and kills “billions!”. I’ll be flat, the second half of the film is where it really gets going. The first half is him in space, then in smallville, and then finally returning to Metropolis. Bits and pieces of Luthor and Lois are thrown in but not a lot. Like every other Superhero film with the exception of Batman, it gets going about an hour in when our hero finally…ahem…returns. The airplane/space shuttle saving is really incredible…the fx were not done but you could tell from what was there this will be a very intense and memorable scene. Panic flows from Mission control as the first not-nasa-related space flight seems to be a complete disaster until Superman show’s up. He also saves the plane, and sets down in the middle of a baseball stadium. He goes inside and gives a little speech, and then goes to leave the front door to walk into 1000 cameras…so the world knows: hes back.

    Then there was a very enjoyable sequence of Superman doing various jobs saving the world. He saves some mountain climbers, puts out some fires, and finally, he stops a bank robbery that was really cool. Now comes little bits and pieces of Lois and Clark, either in the daily planet, or Superman watching her or some ****, combined with little bits of Luthor and his scheme. He’s kicked an elderly woman out of her mansion and taken her yacht, why we’ll find out later. He robs a museum of it’s kryptonite so he can kill Superman.

    Meanwhile, the world is DYING to know where Superman’s been, and Lois is basically forced by White to give him an interview, no matter how much she does not want to. It’s hard, especially for her. They do eventually begin to warm up to each other, and end it with a very, very memorable scene where they go flying. Lois is still nervous, but they kind of fall of in love while they go flying. You wont get it now, but when you see it on screen you’ll know what I mean. It just looks...right.

    Other little bits happen, but now here’s the next action scene. In comparison to the first two this is very, very small, and it’s also complicated. Basically, Lois and Jason are…kidnapped would be the word I guess-by Lex and his crew. Heres where we find out his plan-he’s used to the kryptonion technology he got at the fortress to make a new continent. It’s already partially created, and by making it full with this kryptonion missile he has would cause a massive worldwide Earthquake and kills billions!Used as bait, Superman comes, and Lex and his men fight him, using stolen kryptonite to make him powerless. They STAB him with the kryptonite, and he’s essentially dies right before lois as they shove him off a cliff on new krypton.

    So, with Superman seemingly out of the way, Lois in tears, Lex locks em up in the boat, and proceeds ahead. What he does not count on is his girlfriend, the weird Kitty Kosloski, thinks he’s nuts and is having a change of heart. Meanwhile, Superman go to the fortress of solitude, where Jor-el gives him his powers back just in time to save the day as the big earthquake hits. I wont spoil the rest, but I’ll just say, it’s good. The very final scene of the film is also, a an instant classic. This film is the ultimate blockbuster-action,drama,comedy. It's got a very happy ending all around.

    Now that you know what happens, you can see its not bad. The pacing is good, very similar to Superman 1. Performance wise, it’s all good. Spacey’s a very memorable Lex, and Routh is a very good Superman. His Clark Kent is bumbling with a high voice, while his Superman is powerful and idealistic. Trust me, he’s good. But the real scene stealer is Kate Bosworth as Lois Lane. I dunno why, but I just really liked her. Her character is the kind that is hard to not fall in love with. Even when she’s mad, she’s just hard not to like. We can see why Superman is so in love with her.

    And now the action. I read in Moriaty’s review that he says theres only 2 action scenes in the whole script-well I’m here to tell you that s a total LIE. Theres 2 action scenes in the way Spiderman had 2 action scenes-or in other words, theres 2 super huge action sequences, and then a lot of other smaller stuff. The plane sequence will be amazing and worth the price of admission. The saving the day montage is classic Superman. The earthquake scene is a 2 parter. Like again, in Spider-man,you have the finale is the bridge and then the fight, but its all one big action scene. Same here. You’ve got the intense Earthquake scene, which has a lot of stuff, from runaway trains to toppling bridges to demolishing buildings. The you’ve got the fight after, including how superman stops new krypton and the fights on the Gertrude,that mega boat.

    To sum up, this will surprise you. It’s a way more mature film then a lot of people will realize. In case you haven’t realized it from reading what happens, this is a big, big film that will be very entertaining and it’s also very good. This is not wall-to-wall action which is why I think Moriaty was bummed. But it is action mixed with drama mixed with comedy. Theres nothing to worry about, and no reason to have so much negative buzz. Moriaty said he didn’t like that the pacing almost exactly like Superman the movie-yeah hes right. That doesn’t mean its BAD-that means its good if anything, because it worked for that movie. It worked for Spider-man. It worked for Batman Begins. And it works for Superman Returns. Call me BlackJack, and I’m out.
     
  2. Bad Superman World's Grimmest Hero

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    12,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    How I hate that munchkin storyline. The reviewer may love that "addition" to the story, but I don't. It's an unnecessary change and it doesn't have to do with "geeks being involved in relationships to grasp it". That was a very stupid comment.

    As for the rest, I'm relieved the film is good.
     
  3. Zor-El Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,004
    Likes Received:
    0
    cant stand the whole kid thing, but i'll give it a shot.
    good to hear it has a happy ending...
     
  4. Showtime Your Friend In Time

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    41,466
    Likes Received:
    4
    That comment made no sense either, if somebody doesn't like an element of a movie's storyline it means their geeks who haven't been in a relationship? Come on.
     
  5. Bad Superman World's Grimmest Hero

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    12,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. My fear is that it may turn into something similar to The Legend of Zorro. Asides from the little demon, the rest of the film sounds really good :up: I can't wait for June 29. . . Yes I will be watching it a day before :D
     
  6. At least the kid doesn't have super powers..

    so what is the hospital scene all about..if jor'el saves supes.
     
  7. lazur Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2004
    Messages:
    6,191
    Likes Received:
    4
    The whole kid thing simply humanizes Superman a bit and makes his sitation more understandable and able to be related to by the general audience.

    I don't see the problem.
     
  8. Tzigone Registered

    Joined:
    May 4, 2002
    Messages:
    329
    Likes Received:
    2
    Okay, I haven't read the review yet - any red flags to make us doubt it's authenticity?
     
  9. Harry seems to think it's genuine. And it does fit in with a lot of what we've been hearing of what was actual filmed, particularly the part where Superman is injured.

    My advice, be cautiously optimistic.
     
  10. Bad Superman World's Grimmest Hero

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    12,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some don't, but others do.
     
  11. Bad Superman World's Grimmest Hero

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    12,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    After all that's been reported, I think that's the best advice anyone can give. :up:
     
  12. Lone Non-playable character

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2001
    Messages:
    9,517
    Likes Received:
    754
    I still need to see how the issue of the kid is played out...

    Off topic but I think we'll see Supes have a kid in the comics too...if you're reading Supes OYL,
    he's been powerless for a whole year
    and it was hinted at during the arc with
    Myxz
    ..
     
  13. Sverdlovski Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    I didn't like it. Especially the part where
    Kowalski saves the day and Supes gets revived at the FOS.
    Meh.
     
  14. Bad Superman World's Grimmest Hero

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Messages:
    12,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow. . . didn't know that :eek: I haven't been following the comics for almost 7 years now. I stopped collecting around that time.
     
  15. Matt IKYN Guy Groupie

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2000
    Messages:
    80,956
    Likes Received:
    8
    "A reviewer who was frustrated by bad buzz"? I've got 20 bucks that says a member of Warner Bros PR staff wrote this.
     
  16. WhatsHisFace Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Messages:
    39,016
    Likes Received:
    0
    The spoilers are nothing I don't already know, but that was a good read nonetheless.

    It'll be a darn good movie.
     
  17. Sverdlovski Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wait a sec... where's the hospital scene? Hmm... I smell a fake here.
     


  18. already said that..just nobody actually read it.
     
  19. KrypJonian The Last Son of Krypjon

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    2,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jeez....I'm so torn here. I want to read the review, but I'm afraid of the spoilers.

    I read the BB script, and while I don't feel like it ruined the movie, I felt it would have been nice to be surprised....
     
  20. Desk Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,229
    Likes Received:
    0
    Riiiight... so the day after a supposedly "fake" review appears, which people say can't exist because there haven't been any test screenings, a purportedly genuine positive review emerges from test screenings held two months ago?

    And I've got to say, for what's touted as a positive review it leaves me feeling anything but. What's described is a tired retread of stuff we've seen before in Superman: The Movie and Superman II (
    A bungling Clark Kent, a land-grabbing Luthor, his kooky assistant betraying him, a parent restoring Superman's powers, etc.
    )

    The only significant original idea I can spot in this entire film is something I can't abide -
    the idea of Superman fathering a kid
    .

    Colour me unimpressed and highly sceptical.
     
  21. The Dude Believe the impossible

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,380
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no way I'm reading those spoilers so can someone just say positive or negative
     
  22. I've been thinking about that too. Perhaps Kitty goes to the Hospital where Superman has been taken after he supposedly dies and manages to transport him back to the Fortress using some sort of Kryptonian technology so that Jor'El can heal him.

    It's only speculation on my part and it does ring a bit Smallville-ish, but it could be an explanation for the Hospital scene and what this guy wrote in the review.
     
  23. Desk Registered

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,229
    Likes Received:
    0
    I didn't see the reviewer say the kid didn't have powers - did you?
     
  24. Yellow Cyclone Pessimist

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    124
    no, no, noooooooo! this is NOT what we need...
    a Ms Teschmacher 2.0. you'd think that LEX LUTHOR would've been able to spot a "girlfriend" who might betray him in the future, but i guess he didn't from SI to SII, so this is what we're getting again :mad:

    ARGHj jaklsdf;jalsdfj;lsakf
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"