Australian billionaire: Titanic II to sail in 2016

Boom

I got nothin'
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
56,060
Reaction score
23,143
Points
203
CANBERRA, Australia (AP) — An Australian billionaire said Monday he'll build a high-tech replica of the Titanic at a Chinese shipyard and its maiden voyage in late 2016 will be from England to New York, just like its namesake planned.

Weeks after the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the original Titanic, Clive Palmer announced Monday he has signed a memorandum of understanding with state-owned Chinese company CSC Jinling Shipyard to build the Titanic II.

"It will be every bit as luxurious as the original Titanic, but ... will have state-of-the-art 21st-century technology and the latest navigation and safety systems," Palmer said in a statement. He called the project "a tribute to the spirit of the men and women who worked on the original Titanic."

More than 1,500 people died after the Titanic hit an iceberg in the North Atlantic on its first voyage. It was the world's largest and most luxurious ocean liner at the time.

Palmer built a fortune on real estate on Australia's Gold Coast tourist strip before becoming a coal mining magnate. BRW magazine reported he was Australia's fifth-richest person last year with more than 5 billion Australian dollars ($5.2 billion).

Palmer said at a news conference that previous attempts to build a Titanic replica failed because proponents failed to raise enough money and commission a shipyard. The Titanic II is the first of four luxury cruise ships Palmer has commissioned CSC Jinling Shipyard to build.

Palmer did not provide a cost estimate. He said he had established a new shipping company, Blue Star Line Pty. Ltd., and that design work for the Titanic II has begun with assistance from a historical research team.

The diesel-powered ship will have four smoke stacks like the coal-powered original, but they will be purely decorative.

The most obvious changes from the original Titanic would be below the water line, including welding rather than rivets, a bulbous bow for greater fuel efficiency and enlarged rudder and bow thrusters for increased maneuverability, Palmer said.

Brett Jardine, general manager for Australia and New Zealand in the industry group International Cruise Council, said Titanic II would be small by modern standards but could prove viable at the top end of the luxury market.

"From a marketing point of view, many will embrace it and perhaps there'll be some that wouldn't," Jardine said.

"If you've got a niche, it's going to work. Why go out there and try to compete with the mass market products that are out there now?" he added.

While the Titanic II would carry around 1,680 passengers, most modern cruise ships create economies of scale by catering for more than 2,000 passengers, he said.

Among the world's largest passenger ships, Allure of the Seas is 90 meters (295 feet) longer than the 270-meter (886-foot) Titanic and has 2,700 cabins.
http://www.rr.com/news/topic/articl...ralian_billionaire_Titanic_II_to_sail_in_2016
 
Only this time it will crash into the Sydney Opera House as soon as it takes off. That's right, I went there.
 
I have a bad feeling about this...
 
I have a bad feeling about this...

As long as no one says "God himself couldn't sink this ship" I think everything will be fine.

Irony is what killed the last Titanic, not an iceberg.
 
I wouldn't go on it... :|
 
The diesel-powered ship will have four smoke stacks like the coal-powered original, but they will be purely decorative.

WTH?

If this ships fails people will be crushed by "decorative smoke stacks"

They're useless and just take up the budget.
 
I would neeeevvvvverrrrrrrr go on this boat, the whole thing just doesn't sit well with me.

I understand as society we have to learn to move on but I think some things should just be left well alone.
 
The only thing that would make this story better is if the Captain of the ship is some apathetic Italian guy that loves texting as drives...
 
They should also make another airship called the "Hindenburg" and build a U.S. naval base near Pakistan and call it "Pearl Harbor."
 
are they going make sure there's not enough lifeboats on this one too?
 
I heard he wants to re-lanch Edsel Automobiles and bring hydrogen-filled airships back, too.
 
This just feels incredibly insulting to me. The man is trying to cash in on a tragedy.
 
Speaking of the Hindenberg, why has no studio attempted a Titanic with that one?
 
Why stop here? Let's sail a new Lusitania through hostile waters and hope for the best.
 
I'm gonna get a ticket.


WHY?

Because I wann be the guy to scream "ICEBERG, DEAD AHEAD!!"
 
Only this time it will crash into the Sydney Opera House as soon as it takes off. That's right, I went there.

Well seen as the article says its maiden voyage will be from England to New York that will be some major detour it will take....:oldrazz:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum statistics

Threads
201,828
Messages
22,032,751
Members
45,826
Latest member
Corinthian
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"