Mani-Man
I just found out about this (he/him)
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 4,768
- Reaction score
- 3,965
- Points
- 103
I'm not so sure about that, don't forget Origins was graphically intensive because of the constant snow throughout the game as well as the affects(?) that the characters would have of the laying snow which looked damn good IMO.
Realistically I think Arkham Asylum would probably have been the only doable title from the series, primarily because most of the game is indoors & typically that would be better from a performance standpoint because you're not having to render in a near entire city in the backdrop constantly. Even then, AA, while mostly indoors was very well detailed, when you start removing what seems like insignificant details of the surroundings that maybe only 1 in every 1000 players will even look at & instead turn it into a blob or a blur, well it ruins the whole vibe.
Ultimately unless the game is relatively simplistic in it's graphics it's going to translate well to the Switch.
Never looked at the Requirements or so for Origins, but i assume the thing isnt as Intensive as Knight...even with the snow and all.
If i remember correctly, Nvidia or so had a Benchmark test or so for Origins...so i could see it being above city and asylum...but still below Knight i terms of Requirements.
I dont know, how well did Witcher 3 run on the Switch? I feel like if you can make that manageable then at least City should work too.
The Switch in the end is just not strong enough for games that are meant for the bigger consoles and it seems far more hassle to get a game to work there than its worth.