MyPokerShirt
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2006
- Messages
- 2,097
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Didn't he change one of Han Solo's scenes and computer generate a lot of the green screen stuff (or whatever the equivalent was back then...)
30 years later. If DC changed Infinite Crisis 30 years later, I could overlook it. 4 months? That's another story. That's an admission that we were sold an inferior product.MyPokerShirt said:Didn't he change one of Han Solo's scenes and computer generate a lot of the green screen stuff (or whatever the equivalent was back then...)
You're right, if Marvel did this you'd hear more complaining. But there is a double standard, and I've mentioned it a few times. Marvel gets flack for turning a sitcom like DAMAGE CONTROL into something nefarious, but DC's been doing stuff like that all the more frequently, starting with Identity Crisis. That's just how it is. Out of the Big Two, DC's the underdog challenger to Marvel's Champion of Sales (they domainte maybe 10-11 months of the year, and that's for a GOOD DC year), and everyone likes an underdog.Marcdachamp said:Thank you. First, for reading my post, second for backing me up. If Marvel pulled this, there'd be non-stop *****ing, but DC does it and it's ok? I call bull ****.
Doc, you and I both know the only thing Lucas changed between the original release and the special editions was that "Episode IV" was added. Even still, that's an addition, not a subtraction, or a "fix". If DC simply added a scene, that'd be one thing, but to out-right change an issue is garbage and I stand by that 100%. IC #7 was rushed, and it showed. The art was definitly not nearly as impressive as previous issues, and Nightwing goes from apparently dead to fine and dandy? That's utter crap.
I'd really like to see what the artists think about this. Did they know beforehand? If so, they're just as much to blame. If not, it's downright insulting.
Dread said:You're right, if Marvel did this you'd hear more complaining. But there is a double standard, and I've mentioned it a few times. Marvel gets flack for turning a sitcom like DAMAGE CONTROL into something nefarious, but DC's been doing stuff like that all the more frequently, starting with Identity Crisis. That's just how it is. Out of the Big Two, DC's the underdog challenger to Marvel's Champion of Sales (they domainte maybe 10-11 months of the year, and that's for a GOOD DC year), and everyone likes an underdog.
- As for Alan Moore's latest project, I read his words about it in the last issue of WIZARD and while he had a few points, I felt he was likely reaching to try to claim that "pornography can be art", and according to reviews, I may be right. Right, porno can be art. And I read Playboy for the articles.![]()
Colossal Spoons said:^I'll read all that when I get back from the gym, I promise![]()
Marcdachamp said:Thank you. First, for reading my post, second for backing me up. If Marvel pulled this, there'd be non-stop *****ing, but DC does it and it's ok? I call bull ****.
Doc, you and I both know the only thing Lucas changed between the original release and the special editions was that "Episode IV" was added. Even still, that's an addition, not a subtraction, or a "fix". If DC simply added a scene, that'd be one thing, but to out-right change an issue is garbage and I stand by that 100%. IC #7 was rushed, and it showed. The art was definitly not nearly as impressive as previous issues, and Nightwing goes from apparently dead to fine and dandy? That's utter crap.
I'd really like to see what the artists think about this. Did they know beforehand? If so, they're just as much to blame. If not, it's downright insulting.
GNR4Life said:So really guys,is All Star Supes really that good?I'm thinking about picking it up.
Consider this:
I enjoyed Red Son,For All Seasons,Birthright and Kingdom Come.
I hate hyped books like AXM,but I love hyped books like Ultimates.
Do you guys think I'll dig it?
There's a real overwhelming sense of people saying how awesome it is no matter what board you're on.
I'm grateful that Nightwing was spared, but not even explaining it? That's lazy, as is releasing something that you plan to change in a few months. On this board, I hear how Marvel's all about the money and DC cares more about the fans. Well, here, Marvel delays something, LOSING money, in order to make sure a good product is released, while DC just rushes it out so their precious 52 can come out on time.Doc Destruction said:The art from #7 was not bad, and saving Nightwing from death was a favor to the fans...something Marvel forgot how to do some time ago.
The Lucas changes to Star Wars were an abomination. Thus, I didn't buy them. I won't be buying the IC collection either, because I'm fine with the copies I have. However, you CAN'T buy any CW stuff for awhile, you have no choice. That makes it worse in my book.
bored said:So,Jaime Madrox, pimp, or super pimp?
Doc Destruction said:The art from #7 was not bad, and saving Nightwing from death was a favor to the fans...something Marvel forgot how to do some time ago.