narrows101
Guest
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2005
- Messages
- 5,039
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
http://www.brettratner.com/content/press/vanityfair2/vf_01.htm
The whole article is online on Brett's site.
The whole article is online on Brett's site.
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
yeah..."Now he wants respect"
yeah...
Respect is nice and all, but it needs to be earned, and I don't think Brett has earned it yet. Profits don't equal talent.
So I'm confused...everyone here thinks he's a hack, and I think he's a director with no distinct vision, yet everyone in Hollywood including the directoral royalty like Spielberg eat him up??
It has to be his "infectuous" personality. He must be the most charming half jew/quarter Cuban of all time!
And another thing I picked up from the article, he soaks everything up like a sponge...it's like he's around these talented, TALENTED, and super-rich people for his own enjoyment, not for the sake of improving his movies.
Ratner's attitude is what exactly makes me despise him as a filmmaker. It seems as if he takes nothing seriously and his ADD doesn't allow him to concentrate on detail.
When he admitted to having ADD and hates working on one scene for too long, I knew immediately that he is wrong for big epic films that have an important story.
Respect is earned, not given. What has he done in order to earn respect? Rush Hour? Family Man? Red Dragon? X3? Money Talks? Yeah, so what? Mind telling me why he feels he deserves respect? Respect is admitting you make mistakes as a director and not feel as if everyone film you've done is perfect.
Directors like Spielberg, Peter Jackson, Ridley Scott, James Cameron, Guillermo Del Toro, John Carpenter, Tim Burton, Bryan Singer, Sam Raimi, Christopher Nolan, Spike Lee, Mel Gibson(Before his tirade), and so on have earned respect as being great directors who create great stories that have a very deep emotional message.
Ratner's style of filmmaking is good for Rush Hour and other films that don't require a lot of thought, however, as a whole he's one of those guys who is a studio yes man and will get the job done in a certain amount of time. A story like X3 shouldn't have been rushed and he shouldn't have been anywhere near the project.
But that's just my opinion.
I think Spielberg, Singer, and others are just being polite and putting on a front when they compliment him. However, that's just my take on the situation. They may really like him and his films, but I find it hard to believe that Spielberg or Singer find Ratner's films to have any kind of substance.
^ That was Caruso's publicist that said that
Caruso's publicist wasn't the only one who said that. Some of his buddies from NYPD Blue said he would become a great actor. Dennis Franz praised Caruso during an interview 14 years ago after hearing his decision to leave the show.
Another example of what I'm talking about can be seen in the special features of Blue Streak. Some people probably think Martin Lawrence is a classy guy after seeing Luke Wilson talk about how wonderful it was to work with him during an interview. I did some research on the show that made him popular and found out that this is hogwash. Tisha Cambell admitted in an interview after "Martin" was cancelled that Martin sexually harassed her.
In Martin's defense, many of the cast who worked with him or are close to him believe Tisha lied about the whole thing. The scene they were filming that contained "sexual harrassment" showed both of them joking around under the covers(during outtakes/bloopers).
So as I said, in his defense, he has more people defending him than anything else.
He even had the woman who starred as Pam co-star with him in Wild Hogs as his wife. So really, you have to wonder if what Tisha said about him is even true.
In Martin's defense, many of the cast who worked with him or are close to him believe Tisha lied about the whole thing. The scene they were filming that contained "sexual harrassment" showed both of them joking around under the covers(during outtakes/bloopers).
So as I said, in his defense, he has more people defending him than anything else.
He even had the woman who starred as Pam co-star with him in Wild Hogs as his wife. So really, you have to wonder if what Tisha said about him is even true.
So I'm confused...everyone here thinks he's a hack, and I think he's a director with no distinct vision, yet everyone in Hollywood including the directoral royalty like Spielberg eat him up??
What I always wondered was what were Tisha's motives if she was lying about this? The result of her suing Martin and Fox was getting kicked off the show, the show being canceled, and her career going nowhere. You made an interesting point about Pam but, Martin being nice to one co-star doesn't negate those accusations made against him. It's obvious that Martin did something wrong to Tisha.