Bush refuses to debate Iran leader

[Mr Sparkle]

two football avatars...weird

 

[Man-Thing]

you need a new avatar Mr. Sparkleypants

 

[enterthemadness]

OMG!!!

I'm sorry my cornball of a joke ruined the enviornment. Go drive your VW (that smokes) so it will fix any ill effects I caused!

I don't have a VW or any car. Don't have a job neither (and I'm looking...but no one is taking me)

Kinda off topic..maybe not..but some of the things Bush says is just priceless.

 

[Man-Thing]

I don't have a VW or any car. Don't have a job neither (and I'm looking...but no one is taking me)

Kinda off topic..maybe not..but some of the things Bush says is just priceless.

He's working hard to put food on your family, so give the man a break.

 

[Mr Sparkle]

you need a new avatar Mr. Sparkleypants

never!!!!!

 

[War Lord]

I support Bush not debating the guy. Bush has to be responsible for anything that he says and that puts him at a disadvantage, whereas Ahmadinejad does not.


Nobody's going to remember what Ahmadinejad has said while everything Bush has said will be copied triplicately.

 

[enterthemadness]

whaaaaa? My dad works hard to put food on the table. The money comes from the government... whoops, you are right. Regardless...

I always jest to people, the Oval Office is the kind of place where people stand outside, they're getting ready to come in and tell me what for, and they walk in and get overwhelmed by the atmosphere. And they say, 'Man, you're looking pretty.'

Washington D.C; November 4, 2004

lol, that is just priceless.

 

[Caliber]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14568773/

Iranian president, Ahmadinejad, challenges Bush to a televised duel on ‘world affairs’

Bush chickens out. I remember when Kerry won the nomination he challenged Bush to one debate a month. Bush responded with "There will be no presidential debates. But then after months of pressure and Kerry offering concession after concession and agreeing to a ton of debate rules, then finally Bush agreed to 3.

now he refuses to debate this guy as well. Bush should have this debate. What's he afraid of?

and not only that, but this is just so damn embarassing. Our president's a moronic coward.

No surprise really since Bush obiviously forgot the meaning of democracy in the first place.

 

[Spider-X]

this is just so damn embarassing. Our president's a moronic coward.

no truer a statement can be made here...

 

[Tangled Web]

I support Bush not debating the guy. Bush has to be responsible for anything that he says and that puts him at a disadvantage, whereas Ahmadinejad does not.


Nobody's going to remember what Ahmadinejad has said while everything Bush has said will be copied triplicately.

That is a good point but I think that someone from the US (a good speaker) should debate this guy.

 

[War Lord]

That is a good point but I think that someone from the US (a good speaker) should debate this guy.

I'm all for Bush getting somebody who's quick with facts and a very good communicator debating him.

 

[Tangled Web]

I'm all for Bush getting somebody who's quick with facts and a very good communicator debating him.

Bill Clinton?

 

[Fenrir]

While I'm no fan of Bush, it's clear that when he's being challenged to historically unprecedented debates, it's only for one reason. People KNOW he is not a very smart man and they're just trying to exploit that.

That's just sad and pathetic. The leader of the richest, most powerful nation on Earth is a dumbass and his enemies are taking advantage of that fact.

 

[Spider-Bite]

I'm all for Bush getting somebody who's quick with facts and a very good communicator debating him.

I agree with that. I actually have to say I support Bush not debating him, simply because I think it would be embarassing and even more damaging to foreign relations. If Kerry was president I'd be all for a debate with the guy, but Bush would probably act like an idiot, making the other guy look right which would only strenghten support for our enemies, and help them gain allies, recruits, and power.

 

[Spider-Bite]

Stephen Hawking. that's who should debate him! Hell I wouldn't even debate that guy cause I'd be too intimidated.

 

[celldog]

ARE ALL OF YOU ******ED???????????

Debate?????????? For what?????? Why?????????? We know all we need to know about this maniac....this new Hitler! If he had nukes he'd rid the world of Israel. Then he'd use them on us!!

Why should Bush or any President waste time with this guy?? good greif!! You people side with our enemies more than with your own country!!

 

[kainedamo]

Relax, Celldog! Down boy!

Someone said world leaders never have televised debates. It's never happened.

But maybe they should. Our leaders treat the public like idiots, and politics is becoming increasingly corrupt. The least our leaders can do is prove that they can hold their own in a good debate with other leaders.

 

[Addendum]

ARE ALL OF YOU ******ED???????????

Debate?????????? For what?????? Why?????????? We know all we need to know about this maniac....this new Hitler! If he had nukes he'd rid the world of Israel. Then he'd use them on us!!

Why should Bush or any President waste time with this guy?? good greif!! You people side with our enemies more than with your own country!!

"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President." - President Theodore Roosevelt

 

[Fred_Fury]

you actually expected him to debate that ****** in Iran? lol

 

[Danalys]

yes. i want to see two ******s debating.

 

[kane9321]

ahh poor bushy,he's scared he's gonna get owned

and as far as "siding with our eneimes" like celldog mentioned

What has the president of iran done to "me" to make him my enemy?..nothing

 

[C.F. Kane]

Say It Loud...

I'm Black and I'm Proud

 

[tomahawk53]

Can anyone here who’s calling Bush out for not doing this tell me why they think the President SHOULD debate this maniac?

 

[Caliber]

That is a good point but I think that someone from the US (a good speaker) should debate this guy.

No if Bush was the leader he says he is, he would debate him. He would have to debate because sending someone else is just a cop out.

 

[maxwell's demon]

Can anyone here who’s calling Bush out for not doing this tell me why they think the President SHOULD debate this maniac?

-because the reason we all think the guy is a maniac is largely due to second hand aco****s.<--(um...typo. that should read "accounts".)O)
-because in his original call for the debate he made at least supeficially valid points.
-because i can't really see openig the lines of communication as being a bad thing, ever. I mean really, what's the harm here?
-because it would show the world community that we are capable of handling things WITHOUT resorting to violence and bad intell first.
-because it would add a level of transparency to these dealiings that has been sorely lacking in world affaris for at least a hundred years.
-And because i like debates.

So really, for me. It should be done becuase it would make me happy inside.