• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

'Casino Royale' Critic/Fan Reviews, Musings, Comments...

The Trainman

Cained.
Joined
Apr 9, 2004
Messages
2,630
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Well, today, we've got our hands on a review from The Sun. I believe it's the same paper who bashed Daniel Craig constantly during filming of Casino Royale. Watch them do a 360º. The review contains minor spoliers, so yeah, you know the drill. This thread can be home to some future reviews from critics and us Bond fans. Let's begin.

Source: http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006480716,00.html

The best Bond since Connery

(You read that right. - T)

MINOR SPOILERS

By THE SNEAK
October 20, 2006

CASINO ROYALE is the most eagerly awaited Bond movie ever.

It’s not out in Britain until November 16 but here The Sun’s secret agent The Sneak gives Sun readers the world’s first review.

He has gone undercover to infiltrate a preview screening of the film, starring Brit Daniel Craig.

I WONDERED if I should do two versions of my review — one for the Bond fans who prefer the tongue-in-cheek Roger Moore and another for those who long for a return to Sean Connery’s classic From Russia With Love.

To be honest, those 007 fans who want more Moore — or Pierce Brosnan back — will not like what I am about to say.

And that is: Daniel Craig is the best Bond since Connery.

Craig’s performance is so strong he could even make moviegoers forget there was anyone between himself and Connery.

He plays the gritty, tougher-than-nails secret agent novelist Ian Fleming meant the world to see.

With his bulked-up frame, intense blue eyes and don’t-mess-with-me attitude, Craig makes Brosnan look a bit girlie in comparison.

Blond-haired Craig has had to dodge as many bullets from internet critics as movie villains since becoming the sixth official James Bond.

But from the black-and-white opening sequence to the pulse-pounding, action-packed end, Craig is telling his critics, “I’m gonna be doing this for years.”

The film includes the most disturbing Bond torture scene ever filmed and shows 007 will not be pulling any punches from now on.

Bond’s Thunderballs get so gruesomely whacked that every man in the audience will feel his pain long after getting home.

And rather than simply dusting himself down after this attack, the new, realistic Bond takes a month in hospital getting his mojo back.

The director, Martin Campbell, returns to kick butt after directing Pierce Brosnan in GoldenEye in the Nineties — and again clearly jump-starts the series for the 21st Century.

Gone are the cartoon-like trappings of past films such as the invisible cars and outlandish villains — and some fans may be disappointed by the noticeable absence of old favourites Q and Miss Moneypenny. But the presence of Dame Judi Dench brings authority and humour to her role as Bond’s boss M.

Casino Royale was Fleming’s first Bond novel. The title was used for a spoof starring David Niven in 1967.

This, though, is the first attempt to bring Fleming’s original vision to life.

And, to be frank, like the novel, it suffers from a lack of sharpness in the plot.

You will need to concentrate as you follow the story because, running at a whopping two hours and 20 minutes, the movie is 20 minutes too long.

A healthy bit of editing would have avoided confusing scenes where some characters appear and disappear inexplicably.

And, often, the characters do things for no apparent reason.

Some scenes seem to be going in a certain direction but end up leaving the audience scratching their heads in sheer confusion.

The novel is the rough template for the film — but screenwriters Robert Wade, Neal Purvis and Oscar-winning Crash writer and director Paul Haggis have to change the enemy and setting in order to bring it up to date. Casino Royale follows Bond on his first Licence to Kill mission.

Not everything goes according to plan, though, and Bond is forced to investigate a terrorist cell on his own, which leads him to banker Le Chiffre played with understated menace by Danish actor Mads Mikkelson.

Le Chiffre and Bond then take each other on in a high-stake game of poker.

Fortunately, the action sequences more than compensate for the complicated plot.

Campbell has ditched the computer-generated imagery and gone back to real stunts – which give Casino Royale a real awe factor.

The set-piece with a terrorist called Mollaka crackles with energy.

He is played by Sebastien Foucan — the real-life free runner who gets his kicks out of jumping from building to building. Mollaka is chased through a construction site and across a crane suspended high above a city.

Another thrilling scene sees a terrorist attempt to blow up an airliner.

Female fans will not be disappointed by the sight of Craig in a picture-postcard Bahamas landscape.

He emerges from the sea wearing a skimpy pair of swimming trunks, set against a stunning Bahamas backdrop.

French actress Eva Green plays the main Bond girl Vesper Lynd.

And she manages to bring out the soft side of Bond that has rarely been seen in previous films.

But beyond that, she still has the perfect assets for a Bond girl that have wowed generations of red-blooded males.

James Bond is the most successful film franchise in history in terms of box office receipts.

And the key to its continuing success is whether the fans are still egging on their hero at the end of each film.

But you can bet on Craig being a hit because when he sorts out his enemy at the end of the film — with his well-worn line “Bond — James Bond”, you just can’t help cheering.
 
That's a shoddily written review, but it's still pretty positive overall and has nothing but praise for Craig. CASINO ROYALE definitely seems quite promising indeed.

I'm still curious about the "20 minutes too long" thing (both the AICN and The Sun reviews have now said that). The script seemed as taut as could be from where I was standing.
 
How is it a shoddy review??

The reviewer did exactly that, he reviewd but didn't drop huge spoilers nor did he give a detailed account of what went on. That is how reviews pre-movies release should be.

Yes, the sun bashed the hell out of craig and have now done a 180 not a 360 as mentioned in the 1st post. This is very good news and now, we just have to wait for the rest of the world to see what all the pro-craig fans have been talking about since day 1.
 
pointman said:
How is it a shoddy review??
It's not a golden standard of journalism. Purely from the perspective of what constitutes good journalistic writing, it doesn't fit. Otherwise, it's fine.
 
pointman said:
How is it a shoddy review??

The reviewer did exactly that, he reviewd but didn't drop huge spoilers nor did he give a detailed account of what went on. That is how reviews pre-movies release should be.

Yes, the sun bashed the hell out of craig and have now done a 180 not a 360 as mentioned in the 1st post. This is very good news and now, we just have to wait for the rest of the world to see what all the pro-craig fans have been talking about since day 1.

Heh, my mistake.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,281
Members
45,876
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"